Uriah Profile picture
Oct 4, 2020 29 tweets 7 min read Read on X
I might start repeating something like this as a mantra: the most important thing in the world no one knows is that children born after the onset of autism epidemic are mentally and (the focus of these tweets) physically fucked up.
Four years back a study was published that compared the grip strength of US millenials with those of a 1985 reference group and found a half standard deviation decline in grip strength during that period, equivalent to a 7 point drop in IQ. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26869476/
An earlier Australian study found virtually the same thing, which is that their young people are also becoming alarmingly limp wristed: link.springer.com/article/10.118…
"Work patterns have changed dramatically since 1985, when the first norms were established,"…(says author of US study) As a society, we're no longer agricultural or manufacturing ... What we're doing more now is technology-related, especially for millennials”.
This is the standard explanation, although it omits the relevant fact that the 85 study found that within a factory a worker’s job had no relationship with grip strength: those who worked with their hands were no stronger than those who didn’t (although hobbies did matter).
I don’t hold this view. I think that what you’re witnessing is a cohort effect and that people born after 1980 (not a year I chose arbitrarily) are actually weaker for innate reasons. An easy way to test this would be to look at elite armwrestlers.
If the decline in Western grip strength is due to a decline in daily hand exercise, you wouldn’t expect to see unusual age differences in top level armwrestling because everyone at that level is training hard.
But if millennials are just fucked up, you would expect them to do badly in armwrestling compared to other sports and that is exactly what you see. Papers on grip consistently find a decline in strength beginning around age 30 ( the age at which athletes decline in most sports).
But very strangely, the North American with the strongest hands (or very close) is the 45 year old Devon Larratt. Two years ago it took everything Larattt had to defeat the 56 year old Ron Bath in a tournament
Armwrestling is not a big money sport, so it can hard to find good rankings or birth dates for the best guys. I managed to track down some names using this outdated list as a guide. I found birth years for 16 guys and the average age was 42 walunderground.com/rankings/html/…
At the time those rankings were compiled there were as many competitors in their 20's (2) as in their 50's. Only 2 of the 16 were under 35 with 5/16 being between 42-45. This suggests that it is ideal to be young as possible while staying on the right side of the millenial line
The really frightening part is when you compare the American armwrestlers to their primary competition, who are all from Eastern Bloc countries. 10 of the top 15 arm wrestlers come from this group and their average age is just 29. xsportnews.com/armwrestling/w…
Say you’re a millennial patriot and don’t like hearing my taunts about how girly you are. You might point to today’s ultra-muscular and athletic millennial athletes. And you’d be right, even more right than you knew. But grip strength is only marginally related to overall muscle.
There is zero relationship between hormones and grip, which means that many muscular men have surprisingly weak hands. A 1979 study measured the grip strength of NFL football players and found them to be only about 2/3rds sds stronger than average sci-hub.se/https://www.ta…
To give a concrete example, every person who first laid eyes on the totally unmuscular Larry Bird found it strange he was a professional athlete, let alone the greatest basketball player in the world. Image
One of Bird’s secrets was that he had the most powerful hands in the NBA: he could bitchslap stray balls into his teammate’s hands at light speed.
I’ve always been fascinated by that guy. He was so bizarrely different from everyone else, like a guy who was raised in the Depression and traveled forward in time to the 1980’s. He was athletic, but in a way people had trouble defining.
Richard Carson recently wrote an enormous paper arguing that grip strength is primarily independent of muscle mass in other parts of the body and that individual variations in grip strength are for the most part due to variations in neural health: espace.library.uq.edu.au/data/UQ_36d985…
To give an idea of what “neural” means here, grip strength is positively correlated with a large number of fmri brain measures such as primary motor cortex volume. Grip declines with age in a way independent of muscle mass and is a better predictor of mortality than sarcopenia.
When fingers flex as a unit they generate half as much force as when moved individually, so "in these circumstances the level of neural drive received by the actuating muscles is also diminished, suggesting that the limiting factor is neural rather than biomechanical."
The central argument I’m making here is the apparent physical decline in grip strength suffered by millennials is actually a mental defect in disguise, a failure of their nerdy brains to effectively coordinate muscle at every level of the body.
I am the only person in a million years who would have this thought, but I think the underlying factor is the same one driving the autism epidemic. Autistics are about 1 sd weaker than normal and interestingly their weakness correlates with their autism. Image
One of the ways people born after the onset of the autism epidemic resemble autistics is in the dulled emotional tone of their voices: they have a hard time sounding genuinely threatening when they need to be or charming or…any emotion really.
There are generational changes that everyone notices but never really talks about. When you listen to tape recordings of even average Joes from the 50’s or 60’s it’s remarkable how crisp and clear their diction is, whereas millennials slur together syllables like drunks.
When people notice this they tend to say things like “we need to start emphasizing enunciation just like the old schools did”, but again I think this is actually a cohort effect and you can tell by looking at elite talkers: sports broadcasters, talk show hosts, etc.
It used to be that just about every famous broadcaster had this rapidfire auctioneer’s patter: Chick Hearn, Vin Scully, Bob Uecker, Hot Rod Hundley or the best known example Johnny Carson. They could speak at incredible speed while never sacrificing emotional inflection.
The fact that these guys are were so universally beloved makes it strange that no young people have come along to take their places; even the Boomers couldn’t quite keep up with them. I don’t think they suddenly went out of fashion, we’re just incapable of producing them anymore.
I'll tweet much, much more on this later but the autism epidemic makes much more sense when it's understood that there are real physical and mental differences between generations and that we've been on the road toward autism for a long time.
That's the end of my first long millenial bashing thread. I won't stop until the world is thoroughly protected from their childish stupidity. Will do something soon on the height of the Dutch, God’s favorite people.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Uriah

Uriah Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @crimkadid

Jan 23
Christianity has historically helped to spread monogamy, exogamy, and consensual marriage around the world. None of these practices, though, originate in the Bible. They are all European traits which have piggybacked on to the Catholic Church. Where, exactly, do they come from? Image
In 1539 Philip of Hesse wrote to Martin Luther, asking him if bigamy was Biblically permissible. His first wife was ugly, smelly and drunk but these were then not grounds for divorce. Luther wrote back, admitting that "God not condemn polygamy.. but even seemed to countenance it”
Image
Image
Luther was not misinterpreting the Old Testament. Abraham, Jacob, Saul, David, and Solomon all married polygamously. The Bible only regulates the practice: a man cannot neglect his first wife, marry her sister, or prioritize children of his favorite wife in his inheritance.
Image
Image
Read 20 tweets
Jan 16
In 18th century England young men and women had complete freedom to select their spouses. This distinguished England not only from India or China but France and Germany. Where did this freedom come from and what are its consequences? A thread on "Marriage and Love in England": Image
To start, a love story. John Paston was a 15th century aristocrat. While John is away from home, his 20 year old daughter Margery pledges herself to his bailiff, Richard Calle. The family is outraged: her brother writes she will end up selling candles on the street. Image
Despite the family’s opposition (and wealth) Calle is confident he and Margery will win out. The law is on their side because Margery had formally betrothed herself to him and in England this means they are already married. The case is taken before the Bishop of Norfolk. Image
Read 20 tweets
Jan 8
Those who attempt to understand the Industrial Revolution often travel down a dead end. Every old economy is mostly agrarian, so European agriculture must have been unusually good, right? But European grain yields were actually awful and they somehow succeeded in spite of them. Image
Take this standard account from Robert Allen. It notes that on the eve of the Industrial Revolution English grain yields were good by the standards of northwest Europe, which itself “reaped yields twice those in most other parts of the world”. This is misleading in the extreme. Image
While Napoleon’s armies were in Egypt they surveyed the country's agriculture and discovered that it was more than twice as productive per land unit as in France. What's more surprising is that, when irrigated, the land yielded more even than in industrial age England. Image
Read 12 tweets
Jan 2
Why do the Somali have such thin bodies and large foreheads? This physical type is often explained as an adaptation to desert heat, but occurs in no other desert population outside Africa. The real culprit is milk anemia, a disease common in pastoralists and, once, in Europeans. Image
There are other African peoples, all pastoralists, that share many aspects of the Somali “look”. The type goes by many names: Hamitic, Cushitic, Ethiopid. Because they are often tall, the Belgian anthropologist Jean Hiernaux categorized them as “Elongated African". Image
The “F”s on Hiernaux’s map stand for Fulani, another pastoralist people. The Fulani have a striking physical resemblance to East African herders; many I think, could pass as Somali. There is though no close genetic link between them, something Hiernaux guessed 60 years ago. Image
Read 39 tweets
Jan 19, 2023
I grew up in rural Minnesota, about the least English part of the US. When my family went on vacations to "Real America" it dawned on me that we were not yet fully assimilated. We were Minnesota nice, but the Old Americans had something we didn't: they were "gentlemanly".
On vacation, my family went out to a Arizona VFW to celebrate my sister's 10th birthday. As he was leaving this long faced cowboy looking man congratulated her and casually handed her a 20. I was amazed at that. Minnesotans are _very_ nice, but they don't do things like that.
I tried to understand: why don't Minnesota Germans and Norwegians ever act like that? Maybe because it would be seen as invasion of privacy, but that's only a rationalization. Germanics don't do it because they're stiff: they prefer straightforward, stereotyped politeness.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 16, 2023
This thread is all about your legal options if you were to travel back in time to medieval Europe and murder someone. It's also about measuring the decline of the extended family and the origins of English individualism. On Bertha Phillpotts' "Kindred and Clan in Past Time".
Say as an example you traveled back in time to 14th century Sweden and murdered somebody. This is who and what you would have to pay: plaintiff 7 marks, King 4 marks, parents 2 marks, brothers 1 mark, 1st cousin 1/2 mark, 2nd cousin 1/4th, 3rd cousin 1/8th.
The old Germanic name for this custom is wergeld. The wergeld gets mocked as barbaric, but understand that the fine to be paid was huge. In early laws it was often set at 200 gold solidi, which Seebohm thought was the equivalent value of 100 cattle, the original Germanic fee.
Read 31 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(