Global Butterflies (who contributed to the SRA template ) says "transgender" developed to cover 3 terms: transsexual, drag queen and cross dresser
The SRA template uses the term gender expression
Meaning clothing, haircut, voice on a full or part time basis....
Or as Stonewall tells the kids, if you are a girl you might dress in a certain way or read certain books
The SRA says that if a male colleague decides their gender expression means they feel more comfortable using the ladies them they can.
And as an elected representative if you so much as like a tweet questioning whether the lawmakers really did intend this, the enforcers will pop up to condemn you and invite you for a struggle session.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I gave evidence in the Sandie Peggie case because the hospital board & male Dr refused to accept as findings of fact that that men are more likely to commit violent & sexual crimes, that men are more dangerous to women, so women are more heavily impacted by men in their spaces than vice versa.
You can read my witness statement here.
These are the facts it attests to.
You don't need a degree of any sort to understand these facts.
I've written to @stonewalluk CEO Simon Blake applauding his leadership in discarding Stonewall's previous extreme and divisive definition of "transphobia".
And explaining the damage that it did.
It's not good enough to quietly back away from it after doubling down for so long
It said that Stonewall's guidance was in line with the Equality Act 🤨
The government's @oeogovuk has recently admitted it is a clear misinterpretation of the law to suggest that the Equality Act requires allowing people to access opposite sex facilities because they have the protected characteristic of "gender reassignment" gov.uk/government/pub…
15 months after calling me in for questioning about a tweet, and having sat on the CPS decision that there was no crime for 2 months, the Met bothered to call me up at 7pm this evening to tell me, and then put out this press statement. 🙄
#TheProcessIsThePunishment
Here is the tweet over which they wasted their time, my time, my lawyers time and taxpayers' money.
Minister for Women & Equalities says "We are proud of the EqAct & the rights & protections it affords women. The Govt does not plan to amend legal definitions in the act.”
Hundreds of women are going to Parliament on Wednesday to ask the govt to rethink.
It took 22 more years before 1919 the Sex Disqualification (Removal) Act was passed permitting women to become join professions and to become lawyers and civil servants and to sit on juries.