So... we're going to big up Megan Thee Stallion for using a Malcolm X quote on Black women and a Tamika Mallory quote re: Daniel Cameron...
but we gon' ignore the lyrics of that song and the strip club representation of Black women in her dancing?
If we doing that, we trippin.
I agree that Black women are the least protected and honored members of our society. But we need to have a conversation about how *we* value them right along with the conversation about protecting them. "I'm savage" ain't it. Sexual exploitation ain't it.
I'm sorry. But it's not "heroic" to, on the one hand, seek fame and wealth by portraying the images and messages that dehumanize black women, while on the other hand decrying the other actors that exploit, abuse, demean and harm black women. It's not OK b/c you're a black women.
One of the reasons I long for African Americans to have a greater controlling share in entertainment production, curation, etc. is because I'm hoping there's a cadre of us who will actually self-consciously and constructively change the images and messages we're selling about us.
Last time I wrote about the image of Black women in society and media, questioning the sexually exploitive and inconsistent messages of Black women artists, a young sister wrote me off as "some old pastor in his 50s." Okay. But right is right. And we need to talk @ what's right.
If we're demeaning and exploiting ourselves, we can't be surprised if others want to continue doing it, too.
Necessary first step in stopping others: Let's stop doing it with and to each other.
Very close/simultaneous second step: Let's shut down others.
Agency must be coupled with high standards of responsibility and morality. Otherwise, "agency" is simply unaccountable autonomy, recklessness in the name of freedom, and often exploited by capitalist motives.
True agency is self-control harnessed to constructive goals.
We need a lot more true agency. We have a moment in which to seize it. But we're going to need to have a difficult conversation about expectations we have for ourselves, esp our high-profile entertainers and artists who inform and influence so powerfully through their mediums.
/E
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
While some mount defenses of slavery and slaveholding, the seminal event of the Old Testament that helps define God’s relationship w/ His people is His literal freeing them from slavery in Egypt. The exodus shapes their entire life and worldview, woven thru their celebrations.
You can only miss this if you’re identifying with Pharaoh and enslavers. That identification with the powerful and villainous blinds you to the wretchedness of forced bondage, makes you sympathetic to abstract justifications, and hard-hearted to those suffering the injustice.
But to read Israel’s sacred texts (i.e., the Bible), you read the history of their groaning in slavery which God heard, the celebration of deliverance in their poetry, and the ritual re-enactments of freedom on their highest holy days—but not one sympathetic word for Pharaoh.
The stubborn fact of American history and culture is that professional law enforcement has always sided against African Americans with white citizens in general and even armed white mobs and citizens.
Here's a test:
Can you name a single situation absent a presidential order when local law enforcement officers came out in support of African American rights against armed whites threatening us?
Almost always the state has wielded law enforcement against the interests of AAs.
First, I assume this video dates back (2012) to the release of John's book, "Slave." The book is about our slavery to Christ and the video, in part, promotes the good and right nature of the Christian's voluntary enslavement to His loving Lord who voluntarily died for them.
So, if we listen to this with the biggest grains of salt, we can see what John is saying.
However, several other things really must be said in critique of this video.
1. It's irresponsible editing to sandwich together misinformed comments on human slavery w/ slave to Christ
/2
It must also be said that John simply gets human slavery wrong. Slavery is not an inherently good institution comparable to parent-child or employer-employee relationships. The problem w/ slavery is not that its a good system with abuses. The problem w/ slavery is it IS abuse
/3
If you’re writing about “race” and racism and your argument essentially resolves in, “View everyone as an individual,” you are not fundamentally writing about “race” or racism, which by definition concerns groups and the attributions we make about them and actions toward them.
In the last 24 hours, I’ve read posts from @RevKevDeYoung and Greg Morris, both lovely and faithful bros in he Lord, both making good points about the ways we can wrongly judge at individual levels, and both appearing to resolve in individualistic conclusions @ group phenomenon.
We need the cautions they give—all of us. But in this season, what we need most is careful understanding of racism itself and of the culture’s tendency to over-individuate as a way of minimizing racism and absolving oneself. Another tool in that process? “All sides”-ism.
Here I am again w/ one of those threads that tries to express something that I'm not sure I have the correct words for. So, again, dear reader, grant me grace as I try to clarify a tangled set of thoughts and feelings that will certainly miss the mark in some direction.
/1
I know different people feel a lot of different things right now. And I know that those different feelings lead people to make a lot of different demands on others, most often white people. And I can see that a lot well-meaning white people then feel paralyzed and silenced.
/2
For example, sometimes the demand seems to be "please listen." Other times the demand is, "Don't ask me." Then other times the demand is "Go learn about the issues." Sometimes it's "You need to feel __." Then there's the demand to "Do something." All of these have their place.
/3
The contrast between militarized police responses and community police responses could not be more stark. The cities with militarized responses are burning, by and large. The cities with police chiefs who JOINED the protests and talked with people are not, by and large.
The simple affirmation of humanity, dignity, legitimate complaint and hurt has potential to transform potential conflict into powerful community. Love does that. And love was always meant to be married to authority, guiding authority by its redemptive vision.
Among the many challenges and questions that face our troubled nation and works today, the most urgent and fundamentalist this: Will we find courage, strength and faith to love one another—especially those in authority? We’re doomed with love. We have a chance at survival with it