Note that this has nothing to do with CIFS. Nothing at all. But it speaks volumes about the developer investment in supporting NFS vs CIFS clients in Linux.
I don't mind using CIFS. This took seconds to figure out. But it aggravates me that a perfectly good and simple UNIX technology (NFSv3) is orphaned.
Supposedly local remapping is possible with NFSv4, but you see a pattern here? Local. It has nothing to do with the protocol, and everything to do with a lack of a cohesive story for remote mounts and UID/GID overrides.
But sure. Keep hacking away at Wayland. The year of the Linux desktop is just over the hill. Infrastructure is not sexy, right?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@esxi_arm Yup! Getting firmware working and polished is a massive massive undertaking. One that I and a very special set of folks from around the world have been driving over the course of a few years now. All as a side act.
@esxi_arm It all started in 2016, when Microsoft put out Windows 10 IoT for Pi 2/3 and released the sources to their TianoCore modifications github.com/ms-iot/RPi-UEFI
@esxi_arm In 2017, Ard Biesheuvel separately developed an early port of 64-bit UEFI support. And this one had PSCI (via TF-A, then called ATF).
I've been a corp citizen for 15 years now. I've learned that most meetings really can and should be an email.
1:1 meetings are good - they are the quickest way to sort out any kind of a question, discussion or argument. If you send an email, and the reply comes back with more questions than you had statements - time for a call. Don't play email tag.