In some instances, the president being a moron has mitigated the effect of him being a very immoral person. In this instance, the effect has been exacerbating.
Also, I’m not sure I can recall an instance where the president’s supporters have been harder on the wrong end of public opinion as when they describe shit like this as brave and COVID mitigation as cowardly.
The public has a bias toward being fearful of threats — something the president demonstrates he understands when he talks about crime. But here, he commits to a position that is both ridiculous and very unpopular.
In everyday life, people get mad as hell at people in their communities who they think have recklessly exposed others to COVID. I joke about COVID Corey but it’s actually an apt point — people *hate* COVID Corey. You don’t want to be COVID Corey.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If the president’s testing timeline was exculpatory, would his Conley have refused to describe the testing timeline? He said he wouldn’t get into that when asked when the president’s last negative test had been.
It seems obvious what happened here: The president knew or had good reason to believe he had COVID, he didn’t want to admit it, and he just hoped it would be a mild enough case that he could just muddle through without disclosing it, superspreading all the way along.
He’s like COVID Corey, all the way down to the obnoxious social media presence.
I'd like to see more specifics on how the city and the state are engaging Orthodox Jewish communities to contain these outbreaks, which are heavily concentrated there. This has not been a core competency of city government in the past.
If the city and the state fail to enforce educational standards at Yeshivas, that's a problem for Orthodox youth. But if they fail to get buy-in on COVID prevention, that's a problem for everyone.
Of course, the data we're seeing largely reflect how bad the COVID situation already was before the high holidays...
I keep hearing people say "who does the president owe so much money to?" but we already have such a list of debts and creditors from his financial disclosure form. It's Deutsche Bank, etc. Am I missing something?
Some of the stuff some of you are describing about how you think the Deutsche Bank loans work doesn't make any sense.
I think some of you are referring to this allegation, but this isn't what "underwrite" means, and your source is the non-banker son of a late DB banker. He was also a source for the NYT's David Enrich, who didn't follow this angle, presumably for a reason. forensicnews.net/2020/01/03/tru…
Stop saying Donald Trump is “broke.” Does a broke guy have a private 757? Trump isn’t broke, he’s a rich guy with a high income who doesn’t pay nearly as much income tax as he should. nymag.com/intelligencer/…
If you see a tax document that says Donald Trump has no net income, you should take it seriously, but not literally. nymag.com/intelligencer/…
If you call Trump broke, he'll deny it, and most people won't believe you, bc look at him, he's rich. His best ratings in polls have to do with business/economy. But say he pays little tax on his high income, he won't deny it, and his refusal to release taxes will support you.
The Minneapolis pledge to abolish the police department really looked like vaporware at the time, which it was, overhyped by its supporters and its detractors alike.
What courts will do will depend on the circumstances. What we saw in 2000 was controlling the courts can get you a win if the vote in the tipping point state is very very very close — almost indistinguishable from a tie.
I think some of the pandemic balloting issues may widen the margin of what’s “close enough to argue over,” but it’s still the same structure.
If you’re trying to maximize your odds of winning, how many millions of dollars of TV ads would you give up to be able to “win” if you actually lose the tipping point state by 0.05%?