Liberal white women who prefer pandering to minorities over keeping communities safe are not a demographic I care about or the GOP should care about. Ignore them, because law and order is broadly popular across sane demographics (see graphic). washingtontimes.com/news/2020/oct/… 
1) yes, Republican women can be liberal, and here is an example 2) white liberal women see minorities as virtue trophies, as ways to make themselves feel magnanimous, but the policies they favor actually hurt the communities they pretend to care about. Ignore them.
"But liberal white women don't like tough on crime policies, so I guess we have to just accept rioting, looting, and jailbreak bills😔" LOL no, grow a pair and get off your knees
Who will make up for AWFL losses? Minority men, who generally support Trump in larger numbers than their female counterparts and are more spirited anyway. Refuse the AWFL gynocracy!
Trump's approach to rioting was virtually hands-off, and he recently promised black voters $500 billion in affirmative action cash along with more criminal justice reform in the "Second Step Act." That's already too much for us, and yet it's not enough for AWFLs.
Do we really care about these people? I don't. We have already given them too much, and we haven't even started paying the price for that mistake.
It makes absolutely zero sense to oppose "radical feminism!", but then castrate your law and order platform to appease liberal women.
The GOP framed Trump's inaction against rioting as "let Democrat cities burn so Democrats realize Democrats suck and they'll vote GOP"
Therefore, do you really think it's worth trying to win over AWFLs who think you still "veered" too hard?
Therefore, do you really think it's worth trying to win over AWFLs who think you still "veered" too hard?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
