The announcement of a nationwide return to Level 1 alert seems like a good chance to observe how effective our ready response was, and how well the contract-tracing ability we've built out of nothing this year has worked. 1/
You only need to look at the dysfunctional tracing network in the UK, or to see the US White House apparently unable to even look after its own tribe to get a sense of how bad these things can be. There were some curveballs, but our system worked. 2/
When the likes of David Seymour uttered their multiple screaming tweets declaring the system had "failed" it was just reckless political speech and it was insulting to the people doing the work. I guess Seymour et al won't be saying that today. 3/
This isn't to say there won't be another outbreak, or that we can entirely relax, which we did a bit too readily last time. But I feel much better about the prospects for any "next time" than I did a couple of months ago. /ends
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. Some observations on the current kvetching about the prospects for a "Yes" vote in the cannabis referendum. The first is that the most consistent factor in voting intentions, in poll after poll, is political partisanship.
2. There are current National MPs who support cannabis reform, but they are forbidden to to say so and must now pretend their private vote will be in line with that order. National Party voters have got the message that this is not their bill.
3. But that's clearly not all of it, because even on this weekend's disappointing TVNZ poll, legalising and regulating cannabis is still more popular with the voting public than the National Party is.
I *partly* agree with the complaints that the programme focused on extremes in its depictions of people who use and produce cannabis in NZ. But it's complicated. The truth is that most of the 300k+ past-year NZ cannabis users are too normal and boring to put in a documentary ...
Even the people who did appear aren't really quite as fruity as they looked on TV. When you're obliged to wear a masquerade mask, you look like a weirdo. If you have to hide your face, you look dodgy.
Rua Bioscience's head grower Brandon Wevers presented as a nice, open family man who happened to have spent decades growing illegal weed. We'd have perceived him differently had he been honking through a mask to evade identification. That's what the law does.
What I like about this is that @PouTepou isn't just yelling at the PM to get on board – he articulates very well why she hasn't weighed in and the risks of her doing so. But I'm with him – it's time now.
Is Jacinda Ardern voting "Yes"? Of course she is. Among other things, in 2016 she signed an open letter from the Drug Policy Alliance calling for an end to the War On Drugs, as her party's Justice spokesperson. drugpolicy.org/resource/post-…
I never worked out how the half-dozen signatures from NZers were solicited, but alongside names you'd expect, (Metiria Turei) there is ... Duncan Garner? Garner has since spouted a lot of garbage about drug law, so maybe he signed by accident. Prime Minister, don't be like Duncan
Tried to restore Microsoft Office after a hard drive failure (had the product key) and find myself forced to move to Office 365. Sucks. But I can't use the applications until I create an account, which Microsoft won't let me do because it says it has one under my email address.
Oh, okay, maybe I *did* have one. Ask for a restore code, which it turns out is for someone with a similar name (another Russell B). It rejects my real address then eventually asks me if I still want to create one with my real email address, then fails to do that. Repeatedly.
Absolute security shocker, Microsoft, and a deeply shitty customer experience. I've emailed the *other* Russell B (in California) in case he's getting alerts about login attempts. What a debacle.
I'm so sad to say that Phil Wallington, one of the greatest characters I've ever met, died this morning. Phil had more influence on my working life than anyone else I've ever known. His approach to journalism, his love of storytelling, the way he treated people around him.
My time in TV might have been a lot shorter without Phil. When we were struggling very early on with the media show and the network wasn't happy, he arrived as our new producer and turned it around. I still recall the conversation after the first show he sat in on ...
"How much do you like the producer in your ear? Could you do with less?"
"Well, a bit less ... "
"How about none?"
"Okay!"
It's your show, he told me, and for the next month, he didn't say a single word on the studio comms. It worked.