You can (usually) spot the difference between an American Trumpanzee and a GRU-Troll with a simple test - The GRU relies on software to generate voice output for them to hear, and voice-to-text to generate their replies. They *can't* read English text from an image!
Conversational English is a mandatory course in their high schools.
GRU-Trolls aren't highly-trained spies, they're basically hired off the streets based on their spoken English skills. This is modeled on phone banks, like when you call Technical Support. They have a flipbook...
The software is adapted from an American product, so when they speak a word that has homonyms, it gives them the option of which *there/their/they're* to select.
But most of them can't read the options (written in English, not Cyrillic), so they just guess.
This is significant.
I figured this out from a heated discussion about how assault rifles being worthless for deer hunting.
The GRU-Troll claimed that his AR-15 was great for hunting, but he kept referring to his "dear rifles".
I posted this from Google, and he responded like it was a meme.
This wasn't an isolated case - I've been using this trick to ID GRU-Trolls vs American Trump supporters for over a year, and they haven't fixed it yet.
Reading text from an image requires Optical Character Recognition (OCR), which is much more expensive than Text-to-Speech.
They have Supervisors who *can* read English text from images, but the GRU-Trolls are reluctant to ask for their help.
For example, I posted the screencap of this newspaper article, and he asked his boss for help:
He got the intended meaning correct, but totally missed the "hand job" reference. They apparently are called something else in Russian.
I've "weaponized" this, as even a Supervisor can get in trouble for saying the wrong thing.
He's sensitive about MH17, for example:
You can also make a GRU-Troll very nervous by pointing out how many GRU generals who have died suddenly, often after making a blunder.
The Netherlands Intelligence Agency hacked the Internet Research Agency's own security cameras. The general wore his uniform to work every day.
When you only have a few dozen atoms, they are fighting two different forces - One tries to make them into a crystal, the other tries to make them form a sphere (like a bubble).
Silver is esp hard to crystallize because of its dense nucleus.
The Moscow Hotel suite had more cameras than CNN, aimed at the bed.
Incest is too sensitive a topic for the MSM to mention, esp when it involves a "Billionaire" whose favorite Bible quote is "An eye for an eye", and is notoriously litigious, so the video was called "the P-tape".
THAT'S how you control an asset. Carrot and stick. He needs money, you give him money. You also give him a hot wife to keep him in line, so you don't have to threaten him with releasing the P-tape...
I used to design radars before I helped on Stealth, and the big heavy earth-penetrating radars you see on TV can see some 30' down. IEDs are usually buried a couple feet down, so a radar that could spot them shouldn't be anywhere near as big or heavy (think cigar box).
the buried IED while flying the path of the convoy, and drops a thermite grenade on it, then scans for the guys holding the switch, and takes them out with a small frag grenade.
The Boeing guy didn't seem impressed, saying that by the time we got it working, we'd be long gone.
Well, it's 2020 and we still have boots on the ground in the area, so I figure maybe I should pass the idea along to someone who could appreciate having fewer IED-related casualties.
It should be a "go-do" project, cheap add-ons to cheap drones. Raytheon could make them by 2021.
So far, the Russian Trolls have not been able to read English text from an image.
In Russian schools, Conversational English is a mandatory course. GRU-Trolls use software that can convert *this* type of text into spoken English. It can't do Optical Character Recognition.