The map is a composite of age/weight profiles, prior undiagnosed exposure to similar coronavirus, and effective utilization of state capacity in order of significance. A failed check on all three gets you the American (continental) level of casualties.
Mainland SE Asia has the lowest casualties in spite of marginal governance because of no fatties, resistance from previous undiagnosed localized viral sweeps. East Asia, some resistance, but again fewer fatties, strong state capacity geared towards pandemic suppression.
Sub Saharan Africa has no fatties and the youngest demographic profile, so again marginal impact. The America's are the most distant and isolated population from the old world and likely more susceptible to old world diseases, also fatasses everywhere. Rest of the world pass/fail
each criteria to varying degrees so their casualties are intermediate of the outlier poles.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
China's Muslims and Japan's Empire or Liberalism and minority policy; a book review of a sorts. One of the trends in Western China scholarship is what I would call Qing revisionism. New Qing studies is the origin of the term, but the purpose is actual widescale historical
revisionism away from Party historical orthodoxy and towards a "truer" version of history. The reasons for this are partly Western academic trends towards deconstruction, partly younger academics overturning their elders, and a small part quasi geopolitical attack to undermine
in their own small fashion state history and foster historical nihilism. The problem is of course is that the academics fail to comprehend the great utility of little white lies. Speaking of the book, it lays out the opportunistic collaboration of Chinese Muslims under Japanese
Another example of Journalists lieing out their ass relying on reader ignorance to create fictional narratives. In this case though, it's probably the reverse as the Journalists was already wedded to a narrative and just started making up reality to fit it. The Utsul Hijabs that
are depicted in the photo and referred through the article as traditional are anything but. They are normative to the pre-modern middle east perhaps but are completely alien to South-East Asian Muslims. It would be as if claiming the three piece suit as traditional Chinese attire
Hijabs as depicted did not even exist in SE Asia until the latter half of the 20th century, that is how recent they are. Much of the nominally Muslim population women didn't even cover their breasts let alone their hair up into the last century as part of traditional wear.
The idea of “Just War” is neither a hallmark of Christianity or actually designed to prevent civilian casualties. Rather “Just War” is the logical outcome of the Whig/Liberal dialectic and by innate design, if not intent, encourages totalizing wars of annihilation.
Total war isn’t actually a modern concept, it is actually an ancient and primitive one. The complete destruction of an opposing group was the de-facto way of war since man was using wood clubs and flint spears. Even with the arrival of Christianity, this didn’t change much since
the default method of warfare in Europe up into the late middle ages from the collapse of the Roman Empire was the Chevauchee, i.e. the civilian massacre. The big break actually came following the bloodletting of the Thirty Years War and the new European balance of power that
Thought I would follow @dylanleviking example and do a review of a Chinese movie pretty much no one has heard of, though a much more recent film. Was browsing youku and noticed a film called 无名狂 with a completely unrelated English title of Wild Swords. Im a big fan of Wuxia so
despite the trepidation of it being a web movie, i.e. a low budget cheesy affair similar to made for TV movies in the West which are generally shit, I watched it since the trailer at least looked interesting. Despite the unknown actors, limited budget, I was actually pleasantly
surprised by it. I was expecting to be disappointed because so few true Wuxia films are made today, but it was a competent if predictably executed film. The plot is your basic bloody revenge yarn between warring martial arts sect and it doesn't really stray from far away from
Fat Palmer isn't able to think his way through this because of insufficient neurons. The US and China are locked in an ideological struggle but it is one the US started. The United States while simultaneously the hegemon is also exceedingly ideologically revisionist power.
This is because America's political class as a whole is simultaneously bat shit insane and so dishonest that cannot call power competition for what it is and must intellectually retreat to liberal ideology of freedom vs tyranny to justify everything. Xi Jinping is correct to note
that China is under ideological attack and subversion attacks by the United States, thus his defaulting to Leninism and Nationalism to bolster system legitimacy. The same is not true in that China isn't ideologically attacking the United States, not yet at least.
Covid-19 is a genetically engineered bioweapon deliberately released by the Chinese communist party that is also completely harmless. All the totally believable clips of people dropping dead was a Chinese psyop so America would freak out and would wreck it's own economy to
contain it. This was because the US deep state is secretly controlled by Communist Agents who are working in conjunction with China. Actual Covid-19 deaths in the US is actually only about 5k because > 95% of deaths were pre existing conditions, while 40 million died in China in
about six weeks because the pile of cell phones video on Twitter proved it while they are also hiding the fact the three gorges dam had secretly collapsed. Sulfur levels in this image proved they are incinerating millions of bodies.