Incredible scene unfolding at UN Security Council: US, UK & allies are trying to *block* the testimony of OPCW's first Director General, Jose Bustani, who has expressed concerns about the Douma cover-up scandal & support for the whistleblowers. Here's UK's @AmbassadorAllen:
OPCW's Douma scandal directly implicates US, UK & France. They bombed Syria in April 2018 over chemical weapons allegations against Syrian gov't in Douma. OPCW inspectors who investigated in Douma later had their evidence suppressed -- under US pressure. thenation.com/article/world/…
The attempt by @AmbassadorAllen & allies to censor Jose Bustani is a transparent display that they want to censor any dissenting point of view -- even from a distinguished speaker such as the OPCW's first director.
It's all the more poignant in light of Bustani's history: as chief of OPCW he was personally threatened by John Bolton, and then ousted, when he stood in the way of Bush's Iraq invasion plans. Here the US & allies are trying to silence him once again. nytimes.com/2013/10/14/wor…
You can watch live here:
US-UK effort to block testimony of OPCW's first Director General, Jose Bustani, succeeds. The vote was 3 yays; 6 nays; and 6 abstentions. Cowardice & censorship wins.
US-UK-France & their allies should be asked: why are you afraid of hearing from this distinguished diplomat?
After US-UK-France & allies blocked the testimony of OPCW's first Director General at the UN Security Council, the Russian ambassador to the UN, Vassily Nebenzia, read Bustani's statement into the record.
I continue to hope that media outlets that have ignored the OPCW scandal will finally cover it. In particular, I hope @democracynow & @TheIntercept -- which claim to be committed to defending whistleblowers & challenging power -- will end their involvement in the media blockade.
The silence around this story is unlike anything I've ever seen. It exposes fraudulent behavior, under US government pressure, to lodge allegations against Syria that happened to justify a US-led bombing of Syria. How can a US media outlet ignore it? Anyone remember Iraq?
@joshrogin@joshua_landis Josh, it's incredible that you to try to lecture about Syria when you are an open supporter of the proxy war that caused the atrocities. Luckily there are other Americans more aware of the facts, or more willing to acknowledge them. Listen to Joe Biden:
@joshrogin@joshua_landis Biden: "Our allies were our largest problem in Syria... They poured hundreds of millions of dollars and thousands of tons of weapons into anyone who would fight against Assad. Except that the people who were being supplied were... Al-Qaeda & the extremist elements of jihadis..."
@joshrogin@joshua_landis This is what you want us to support. No thanks, I'm not an Al-Qaeda fan. I guess you are?
Professional Sadist @Charles_Lister -- who has spent years lobbying for US, Saudi & others to wage a murderous proxy war in Syria, & then impose murderous sanctions when they lost -- can't challenge Professor Landis on the facts. So he resorts to smears. Truly shameful:
The Grayzone article @Charles_Lister calls "deeply misleading" is based on leaked UK gov't docs detailing a massive Western-funded propaganda effort to whitewash its proxy war in Syria & jihadist groups that benefited. Lister can't challenge a single fact: thegrayzone.com/2020/09/23/syr…
Beyond fact that Grazyzone challenges the murderous Syria proxy war & sanctions that Gulf regimes pay @Charles_Lister to shill for, I assume he also resents that we've exposed things like him actively promoting ISIS' most prominent recruiter on Twitter: thegrayzone.com/2018/10/29/sha…
This interview w/ William Barnett, FBI agent on Mueller team, is devastating. He says Flynn case theory was "supposition on supposition" & that he wanted off of it. Also says Mueller prosecutors were guided not by evidence, but their conspiracy theories. courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
William Barnett, FBI agent on Mueller team, says Mueller's prosecutors were not guided by the evidence; interpreted info to fit their biases; chased repeated collusion dead ends; and used the probe to, in his words, "get Trump." Not a good look. Will it get reported?
.@AWeissmann_ thought Trump-Russia "proof of collusion" occurred in an unspecified "meeting on a yacht near Greece."
It didn't work out, but maybe Weissmann can buy a yacht w/ the money he's making off his new book peddling his conspiracy theories to a captive liberal audience.
From newly released FBI texts, I assume Strzok & Page. This was one day before release of declassified ICA accusing Russia of sweeping influence campaign.
Talk here of "people... scrambling for info to support certain things" & "trump was right. still not put together" = ICA?
FBI agents "all went and purchased professional liability insurance" and so did "all the folks at the Agency" aka CIA, as well. Good call!
"Trump was right. still not put together" -- strong chance that's a reference to this: