Thread by @ADalassio

The phantom time issue. Looks like those extra 1,000 years suggested by Fomenko and Nosovsky are indeed equal to 1,000 years. We cannot simply subtract 1,000 from 2020 for there is a method to the PTB trickery. Here is what this 1,000 years consist of:
( Courtesy of KD)

753 years + 247 years = 1,000 years
247 years: difference between "year of Christ" and "year of Rome"
753 years: maliciously added number to create 1,000 years
753 BC: the official date of when the city of Rome was founded.
This was needed to fraudulently present I / i / J / j as

1. I.e.:
I653 became 1653
i587 became 1587
J472 became 1472
i725 became 1725
Whether these I / i / J / j stand for Julius Caesar is up to us to determine. They sure do not stand for Jesus Christ or #1.
It's of paramount importance to understand when they convinced us that I was 1

If we figure this out, we can understand when the count "of Rome" stopped, and lies started.
The switch from "of Rome" to our fake dating would probably mean some big event.

this is where the key to the riddle is located.

Let me show you something interesting. For our calculations we are going to use the below chronological reference from the above book. The most important thing to understand is that all three of the below dates mean the exact same year.

Year of the World = Year of Rome = Year of Christ
4739 = i530 = 777 ... these are the same year
​I am not going to use "year of the world" for we do not need it for our calculations, and I do not really know what it means, though we all might have an idea.

This cutout means:
Year of Rome: 530 = I530 ≠ 1530 AD
"I" stands for something we do not quite understand yet, but "I" ≠ "1".
"I" is not a digit.
Year of Christ: 777
Difference: 777 - 530 = 247 years
That means that Christ was born/dead 243 before something happened to Rome

(established/demolished, Julius Caesar born/died, etc).
Christ came 247 years earlier than Rome... that's for simplicity.
Catch 22: They took year 530 (of Rome) and used "I" to present it as "1". Now we have year 1530.
Year 1530 was presented as a "year of Christ."

In reality the year "of Christ" was 777, but now it became year 1530 "of pseudo-Christ"

As you remember from above, the original difference between "year of Christ" and "year of Rome" was 247 years.
Now we do not have any year of Rome left. We only have "year of Christ" - 777

and year "of pseudo-Christ" - 1530.
The difference became 1530 - 777 = 753 years.
"Coincidentally" the city of Rome was founded in 753 BC.
In reality, 753 years is the difference between the made up year "of pseudo-Christ" and the year "of Christ."

Columbus and 1492.
Now let's see how it works when applied to the discovery of America. If this thing works out, it's gonna be super weird and rewarding.
Discovery date #1: 1492 "of pseudo-Christ" - false
Discovery date #2: I492 "of Rome' which is 492
Discovery date #3:

492 + 247 = 739 "of Christ" - true
Now we need to convert "of Christ" to "of pseudo-Christ" by adding our 753 year difference.
Fake date: 739 "of Christ" + 753 "difference" = 1492 "of pseudo-Christ"
True (re) discovery dates of America
492 - Year of Rome aka "I"492

739 - Year of Christ
1492 - Year of pseudo-Christ
Are you with me, so far?

Talking to myself again...
Good night.

Before I continue, I better try and contextualise this thread. For those of you who are not familiar with Fomenko's theory and more generally, the phantom time hypothesis, here is a brief introduction. According to Fomenko's New Chronology, history as we know it was fabricated

by Christian scholars
Everything you thought you knew about history is wrong.The Roman Empire emerged in the late Middle Ages not the eighth century B.C. In fact, Ancient Rome Greece, and Egypt as we know them didn’t exist at all. And Jesus lived and died in the 12th century A.D.

The guiding principle is that recorded history before the 11th-14th centuries is generally unreliable for various reasons. Virtually all extant documents from the period before that time, Fomenko writes, are untrustworthy, due to various reasons .

Virtually all extant documents from the period before that time, Fomenko writes, are untrustworthy, due to a number of factors: poor timekeeping devices, inconsistent record-keeping, limited availability of surviving documents, lack of movable type, and so on.

Now look at this pictures and see if you are starting to realise where all of this is going.

It's highly unlikely that anyone told you before that there is not ONE single piece of firm written evidence or artefact that is reliably, independently and irrefutably dated older than the 11th century. The so called universal classic world history is a pack of intricate lies

World history as we learn it today was entirely fabricated in the 16th-18th centuries on the ‘firm’ foundation laid down by Italian ‘scholars’ both white and black robe clergy, the ‘humanists’ in 14th-15th centuries. Petrarca and Dante, Bracciolinni and Macciavelli, Giotto etc.

Although the main culprit according to Fomenko's theory is a 16th-century French Christian scholar Joseph Scaliger. According to Fomenko, Scaliger ranks among the leading historians of the time who helped forge and propagate the “false” record of pre-Rennaisance history

The oldest ORIGINAL written documents that can be reliably, irrefutably and unambiguously dated belong only to the 11th century. All dirty and worn out originals have somehow disappeared in the Very Dark Ages, as illiterate but tidy monks kept only brand new copies.

Now let's return to the main subject and go over a few known events. We will only use normally looking dates. I do not understand what BC/AD mean any longer.

Pompeii Destruction: 79 A.D. no more
IMPORTANT: Officially the city of Pompeii was lost until 1748. Whatever they claim was dug out in 1599, was not linked to Pompeii at the time.
If Pompeii was not discovered and identified prior to 1748 than any mentioning of it prior to 1748

would be a clear and obvious evidence of the scientists trying to substitute true world chronology with bogus data.
The official version states that in 79 A.D. the ancient Roman city of Pompeii was buried under 4 to 6 m of volcanic ash in the eruption of Mount Vesuvius.

The site was eventually lost until its initial rediscovery in 1592 and broader rediscovery almost 150 years later in 1748. After thick layers of ash covered Pompeii and Herculaneum, they were abandoned and eventually their names and locations were forgotten. The first time any

part of them was unearthed was in 1599, when the digging of an underground channel to divert the river Sarno ran into ancient walls covered with paintings and inscriptions. The architect Domenico Fontana was called in he unearthed a few more frescoes, then covered them over again

and nothing more came of the discovery. Pompeii was rediscovered as the result of intentional excavations in 1748 by the Spanish military engineer Rocque Joaquin de Alcubierre.
He was a military engineer in the Spanish Army
who discovered architectural remains at Pompeii

and Herculaneum in 1748. I plan on showing you that Pompeii suffered its fate in 1631, which makes our official history 1,552 years off. I have a pretty strong feeling that the official liars (and I do not mean your local history teacher) know about their mess up.

Unfortunately for them, there was some supporting fake evidence created, and it is no longer possible to portray this Pompeiigate as a simple mistake. They simply cannot play it down due to some highly questionable fakish evidence of the Vesuvius eruption and Pompeii/Herculaneum

@threadreaderapp
Please unroll

destruction, created to support the date of 79 A.D. The "officials" tied too many historical individuals into this story. It is impossible to correct the timing of the destruction of Pompeii without messing up the entire timeline. Below is an example of such evidence.

(c. 69 – after 122 AD), was a Roman historian belonging to the equestrian order who wrote during the early Imperial era of the Roman Empire. His most important surviving work is a set of biographies of twelve successive Roman rulers, from Julius Caesar to Domitian, entitled

De Vita Caesarum. He recorded the earliest accounts of Julius Caesar's epileptic seizures. Other works by Suetonius concern the daily life of Rome, politics, oratory, and the lives of famous writers, including poets, historians and grammarians. A few of these books have partially

survived but many have been lost. Our official history claims he stated the following about the Roman Emperor Titus , "There were some dreadful disasters during his reign, such as the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in Campania, a fire at Rome which continued three days and as many

nights, and a plague the like of which had hardly ever been known before." Coincidentally Titus ruled from 23 June 79 - 13 September 81 A.D., which covers the "official" last day of Pompeii.

My Point: If the eruption indeed took place in 1631, than this Suetonius account is either a fake figure, or he lived at a totally different time. Considering that Titus is tied into the entire history of the Ancient Rome... fill in the blanks yourself.

Note: Various internet sources were used to put this list together.
Maps.

Etchings.
Done in 1633. Pertains to the eruption of 1631.
Mascolo, Giovanni Battista, 1582/3 - 1656, “Mount Vesuvius before / after the eruption,”
Loyola University Chicago Digital Special Collections

Epitaffio di Portici​
Following the disastrous eruption of Vesuvius in 1631, the Viceroy Zunica had an Epitaffio placed to admonish the dangers of the volcano in the future. The epitaph is placed in the current corner between Corso Garibaldi and Via Gianturco, just to the left of

Palazzo Ruffo di Bagnara. Below is the original Latin version and the Italian translation by the Lions Club "Portici Miglio D'Oro" reported on a sign on the right of the Epitaph.