At some point, we need to have a reckoning about the ways that Dems & the media pushed the “Russian collusion” narrative - absent any evidence - and how they’ve refused to revisit it as the narrative has fallen apart.
Just in case you’ve forgotten how bad it was👇
We have to start here with @HillaryClinton, whose team invented this smear.
All of these were from before the election. The timing is important because we just learned today that US intel was worried about how Russia would use Clinton’s concocted attacks: thefederalist.com/2020/10/06/bre…
Of course, she wasn’t alone. Shortly behind her was @SpeakerPelosi, who took the fabricated allegations and, along with the rest of congressional Dems, whipped them into a firestorm unlike anything we’ve ever seen.
One of the key voices in all this, of course, was @RepAdamSchiff, who showboated his way to national attention.
When Mueller couldn’t find anything to validate Schiff’s claims, he pushed them anyway.
It’s a conspiracy theory at this rate.
Clinton’s running mate, @timkaine, ran with the allegations before the election and, as a member of the Senate, has continued to push the “Russian collusion” narrative, through impeachment and beyond.
He isn’t on twitter but again it’s really hard to overstate the role of Harry Reid in the creation of everything dumb and bad in our present politics.
One of my favorite characters in all this has been @tedlieu.
I’m not sure that boosting the reliability of Brennan, Christopher Steele, or the FISA Court has aged particularly well.
Suffice it to say that there were more Dems, but we’ve got other key players to get to. Here’s @dccc summing it up.
From the Dems’ mouths to the media’s ears, as ever.
Perhaps the worst booster of the “Russian collusion” narrative was @MSNBC. That includes pushing @HillaryClinton’s refusal to concede the election. And they had @petestrzok on.
But the worst element has to be @maddow, who boosted every firing idea and story you can imagine. I’ve only got enough room for a handful.
There’s no two ways around it: This. Is. A. Conspiracy. Theory.
She wasn’t alone at her program. @chrislhayes was pushing just about all of the same talking points, including the mother of all wingnut theories, that Trump had been a Russian asset since 1987.
For those interested, I’ve got a whole thread on Russian asset since 1987 smear, originally put to paper by @jonathanchait:
But they’ve got competition even from their own outlet. Here’s @JoyAnnReid, who never sees a left wing conspiracy that she isn’t interested in, with a special shout-out to @MalcolmNance, a longtime booster of Russian collusion.
Also, not sure the Fusion GPS endorsement held up.
You may have forgotten that @CNN had three journalists who had to resign after a retracted story alleging a connection between Trump and Russia.
That may not have even been their worst reporting. Shoutout to @CillizzaCNN.
There was plenty more from @nytimes but I got hung up on the fact that their scenario planning was basically limited to “bad for Trump” to “jail” - in retrospect, that hasn’t exactly held up well.
As ever, the galaxy brain blue checks got involved on this one. Here’s @JuddLegum.
Obligatory @kurteichenwald mention, all of these from before the election.
I will never forgive myself for supporting the candidacy of @EvanMcMullin. I was bamboozled, I’ll admit it.
And @KeithOlbermann had a nightly rant about this for months.
Where is the follow up? From anyone, at all, about any of this?
The Russian Collusion hoax has fallen apart more and more everyday. And we haven’t heard a word of comment from any of the people responsible for pushing it and helping fracture this country.
If you aren’t outraged by all this, and the clear coordination across multiple organs of the US government, I don’t know what to tell you.
I don’t know how to convince you to care that the POTUS has been undermined for four years by a malicious lie from his political opponents.
I’ve said this before and I’ll have to say it again: you don’t need to be a fan of Trump to be outraged about the Russian collusion conspiracy.
But it’s a mark against your patriotism, your judgement, or your intellect if you aren’t.
Also, I’ve said this before, too, but beyond just being perhaps the most defining political scandal of our time, the Russian collusion hoax gets under my skin because I bought it. I fell for it. And I’m enormously angry for having been duped.
And for my friends on the other side of the aisle and in mainstream media: I beg you, pay attention to this.
Treat this scandal with the same kind of anger you had at the (purported) collusion.
Imagine how you would feel if a duly elected Democrat - say, Hillary Clinton - had won an election and then you saw your opponents and the media denigrate her for four years over allegations that never stuck.
How mad would you be?
That’s precisely how mad millions of Americans who think differently than you do feel right now.
And you’ve given them a lot of reasons for anger. Try to empathize with that.
Try to get to the truth.
Also, if you haven’t already seen, I’ve got a whole separate thread on Carter Page:
I just don’t get it. I can’t possibly bring myself to understand how anyone could look back on these takes, knowing what we know now, and not feel a deep, abiding sense of shame at the damage done, and a need to fix it (or hide under a rock forever).
I guess what it all boils down to is that an enormous number of people across politics and the media owe @realDonaldTrump an apology.
I can’t imagine it’s forthcoming.
In case this isn’t showing up for people, he’s the unroll:
Also, for those asking. I don’t have anything to sell/subscribe to. But the pandemic has meant more people needing food banks & fewer people able to help.
In your charity, please consider making a donation, if you can. Capital Area Food Bank is great. capitalareafoodbank.org
I’m sure you’ve all seen the protests and attendant anti-Semitism at many elite American universities. What you may not be aware of is the hypocrisy in how schools have handled them.
Do you remember what these places said about protests in 2020? I’ve got receipts. ⤵️
We’ve gotta start with @Columbia, given their central role in this drama.
In 2020, the university pledged to change how campus police operated, and said protests were part of a “heightened state of consciousness” on race & were driving the “revitalization of American democracy.”
That, unsurprisingly, led @Columbia to embrace defunding the police on their website, citing a professor.
It’s hard to square that sentiment with calling in police in riot gear to rough up students on campus, @Columbia.
Want to see a media conspiracy, based on Biden admin propaganda to smear a GOP governor, come into existence?
If so, follow along. Let’s revisit the media claim that Texas “physically barred” drowning migrants from entering the country.
Another long one ⤵️
Back in mid-January, three people trying to enter the country illegally drowned in the Rio Grande. It happened while Texas & the Biden admin were fighting about security measures.
The Biden admin told the press a lie. The media ran with it, and most never corrected the stories.
The fraudulent story was advanced first by @CBSNews. On January 14, they claimed that the crossers had drowned b/c Texas “physically barred” rescuers trying to help.
The takeaway from CBS was clear: Texas had deliberately killed people, rather than allowing them to be rescued.
Do you remember how bad the media’s “Covid lab leak” - the hypothesis that the virus came from a lab - coverage was?
I thought I did. But it was a more dramatic example of uniform media malpractice than even I remembered.
So I revisited it. Buckle in, it’s long. ⤵️
It started in Feb 2020 when @SenTomCotton suggested looking into the CCP lab studying bats near the initial cases in Wuhan.
The media were outraged. In a since-updated piece, @washingtonpost said the idea was a “conspiracy theory that has been repeatedly debunked by experts.”
It wasn’t just WaPo. Shortly thereafter, @nytimes trotted out a similar allegation, calling the lab leak hypothesis a “fringe theory” and a “tale” designed to inflame social media.
@CNN’s @ChrisCillizza said Cotton was “playing a dangerous game” with his suggestions.
The reason I take screenshots is that I'm always paranoid that an outlet or journalist will scrap the evidence of a bad take. Maybe I should be giving folks more credit for standing by their inaccuracies.
Every so often I check back in on this, perhaps my all-time favorite headline from @NPR, only to see that it still exists in its original form, from April 2020.
I launched a newsletter, called Holden Court, about the media, what they get wrong & why it matters. The goal is to reach beyond what my 🧵s have on Twitter & to build a better recent history of media & media criticism.
You can sign up at the link in my bio. More ⤵️
At that link you can read my launch piece and get a better idea of what it is that I’m trying to do.
The piece also walks through a recent example of bad media coverage that I worry we’re already forgetting about: the start of Covid.
My general premise for the newsletter is that media criticism could be a lot better; more driven by what the media actually does and says and more set in recent context, rather than an impressionistic sense that the media is hopelessly off-track.
I’m launching something new, so naturally I figured the best explainer was a 🧵thread🧵.
Introducing Holden Court, my Substack about the media, what it gets wrong, and why it matters.
You probably know the drill, but more details & links to sign up in the tweets below. ⤵️
Holden Court aims to unpack media failures, particularly when the media misses in unison on important political topics. But I’ll also have one-off content, Q&A opportunities, a mailbag and maybe virtual (or even in person) happy hours, too.
That doesn’t mean the threads are going away. But the amount of context and nuance I can capture in a thread is limited. So the Substack will (hopefully) provide that more robust analysis, aiming ultimately at *why* the media misses the way that it does.