At some point, we need to have a reckoning about the ways that Dems & the media pushed the “Russian collusion” narrative - absent any evidence - and how they’ve refused to revisit it as the narrative has fallen apart.
Just in case you’ve forgotten how bad it was👇
We have to start here with @HillaryClinton, whose team invented this smear.
All of these were from before the election. The timing is important because we just learned today that US intel was worried about how Russia would use Clinton’s concocted attacks: thefederalist.com/2020/10/06/bre…
Of course, she wasn’t alone. Shortly behind her was @SpeakerPelosi, who took the fabricated allegations and, along with the rest of congressional Dems, whipped them into a firestorm unlike anything we’ve ever seen.
One of the key voices in all this, of course, was @RepAdamSchiff, who showboated his way to national attention.
When Mueller couldn’t find anything to validate Schiff’s claims, he pushed them anyway.
It’s a conspiracy theory at this rate.
Clinton’s running mate, @timkaine, ran with the allegations before the election and, as a member of the Senate, has continued to push the “Russian collusion” narrative, through impeachment and beyond.
He isn’t on twitter but again it’s really hard to overstate the role of Harry Reid in the creation of everything dumb and bad in our present politics.
One of my favorite characters in all this has been @tedlieu.
I’m not sure that boosting the reliability of Brennan, Christopher Steele, or the FISA Court has aged particularly well.
Suffice it to say that there were more Dems, but we’ve got other key players to get to. Here’s @dccc summing it up.
From the Dems’ mouths to the media’s ears, as ever.
Perhaps the worst booster of the “Russian collusion” narrative was @MSNBC. That includes pushing @HillaryClinton’s refusal to concede the election. And they had @petestrzok on.
But the worst element has to be @maddow, who boosted every firing idea and story you can imagine. I’ve only got enough room for a handful.
There’s no two ways around it: This. Is. A. Conspiracy. Theory.
She wasn’t alone at her program. @chrislhayes was pushing just about all of the same talking points, including the mother of all wingnut theories, that Trump had been a Russian asset since 1987.
For those interested, I’ve got a whole thread on Russian asset since 1987 smear, originally put to paper by @jonathanchait:
But they’ve got competition even from their own outlet. Here’s @JoyAnnReid, who never sees a left wing conspiracy that she isn’t interested in, with a special shout-out to @MalcolmNance, a longtime booster of Russian collusion.
Also, not sure the Fusion GPS endorsement held up.
You may have forgotten that @CNN had three journalists who had to resign after a retracted story alleging a connection between Trump and Russia.
That may not have even been their worst reporting. Shoutout to @CillizzaCNN.
There was plenty more from @nytimes but I got hung up on the fact that their scenario planning was basically limited to “bad for Trump” to “jail” - in retrospect, that hasn’t exactly held up well.
As ever, the galaxy brain blue checks got involved on this one. Here’s @JuddLegum.
Obligatory @kurteichenwald mention, all of these from before the election.
I will never forgive myself for supporting the candidacy of @EvanMcMullin. I was bamboozled, I’ll admit it.
And @KeithOlbermann had a nightly rant about this for months.
Where is the follow up? From anyone, at all, about any of this?
The Russian Collusion hoax has fallen apart more and more everyday. And we haven’t heard a word of comment from any of the people responsible for pushing it and helping fracture this country.
If you aren’t outraged by all this, and the clear coordination across multiple organs of the US government, I don’t know what to tell you.
I don’t know how to convince you to care that the POTUS has been undermined for four years by a malicious lie from his political opponents.
I’ve said this before and I’ll have to say it again: you don’t need to be a fan of Trump to be outraged about the Russian collusion conspiracy.
But it’s a mark against your patriotism, your judgement, or your intellect if you aren’t.
Also, I’ve said this before, too, but beyond just being perhaps the most defining political scandal of our time, the Russian collusion hoax gets under my skin because I bought it. I fell for it. And I’m enormously angry for having been duped.
And for my friends on the other side of the aisle and in mainstream media: I beg you, pay attention to this.
Treat this scandal with the same kind of anger you had at the (purported) collusion.
Imagine how you would feel if a duly elected Democrat - say, Hillary Clinton - had won an election and then you saw your opponents and the media denigrate her for four years over allegations that never stuck.
How mad would you be?
That’s precisely how mad millions of Americans who think differently than you do feel right now.
And you’ve given them a lot of reasons for anger. Try to empathize with that.
Try to get to the truth.
Also, if you haven’t already seen, I’ve got a whole separate thread on Carter Page:
I just don’t get it. I can’t possibly bring myself to understand how anyone could look back on these takes, knowing what we know now, and not feel a deep, abiding sense of shame at the damage done, and a need to fix it (or hide under a rock forever).
I guess what it all boils down to is that an enormous number of people across politics and the media owe @realDonaldTrump an apology.
I can’t imagine it’s forthcoming.
In case this isn’t showing up for people, he’s the unroll:
Also, for those asking. I don’t have anything to sell/subscribe to. But the pandemic has meant more people needing food banks & fewer people able to help.
In your charity, please consider making a donation, if you can. Capital Area Food Bank is great. capitalareafoodbank.org
Biden’s pardoning of his son Hunter says an enormous amount about the president’s views of justice.
But it also says a lot about the willingness of the mainstream media—the nation’s noble fact checking corps—to repeat bogus claims that suit Democrats.
Remember? ⤵️
For starters, let’s revisit the coverage of how Biden wouldn’t do what he just did.
Biden said he wouldn’t pardon his son, no way. He would trust our legal system.
The media repeated it at every turn, without a shred of incredulity.
Here’s @washingtonpost
Seemingly every outlet did the same. @CNN had a couple of my favorites.
Look at the lede in on this first one.
The media’s job isn’t to simply repeat what politicians tell them. Whatever happened to “defenders of our democracy” and all that?
The news that MSNBC may soon have a new owner (and that it might be a certain X power user) compelled me to finally open my “MSNBC conspiracy theories” screenshot folder and, woo boy, there are a lot.
If you’d like to revisit them, buckle up, and follow along. ⤵️
There’s nowhere better to start than with Russiagate.
Do you remember the promotion from @chrislhayes, @MalcolmNance, @maddow and others at @MSNBC that perhaps Donald Trump was a Russian agent?
I, for one, will not be forgetting.
But there was plenty of other insanity from the gang at MSNBC about Russiagate.
Here are just a couple.
The first seems apropos with Trump again picking a cabinet.
Whatever happened to Harris and Biden’s “strongest economy ever” that the media spent so much time hyping up in the lead up to the election?
I revisit the claims, and explain why they were off the mark about the economy all along, in my latest @AmerCompass.
Quick🧵thread🧵⤵️
It can be easy, in the wake of an election, to forget just how dominant a media narrative was.
One that’s already fading from view was how “great” the economy was, and why it would benefit Harris on Election Day. americancompass.org/its-still-the-…
As a refresher, check out this headline from @axios about the data.
@YahooFinance upgraded Biden’s economic grade to an A. That captures the press sentiment at the time quite well.
In recent days, the mainstream media has taken nakedly ridiculous claims about the tattoos of @PeteHegseth, Trump’s SecDef nominee, to spin up a story alleging he’s an extremist.
It’s an egregious example of politically driven “journalism.” I unpack why. ⤵️
The story really started with @AP, who ran an article claiming that two tattoos that @PeteHegseth has have ties to extremism, citing an extremely thin (and downright suspect) report.
They used that to label him a potential “insider threat” in their headline.
It wasn’t until 3 paragraphs in that a reader was told what that claim rested on: a tattoo of a Latin phrase. They’d go on to mention “concerns” about a cross tattoo as well.
Would be great if Trump’s unconventional picks for his cabinet inspire the media to consider a nominee’s credentials.
They might want to look at the current HHS Secretary, Xavier Becerra, who brings to the table the medical experience of being in Congress for 12 terms.
Or perhaps Obama’s former HHS Secretary, Sylvia Matthews Burwell, who had just finished her stint lobbying for Walmart.
Or Donna Shalala, Clinton’s former head of HHS, whose credentials were as a university administrator and feminist.