US Politics Isn’t ‘Polarized’; It’s In Almost Universal Agreement
"They do not allow for any mainstream discussion of *IF* the oligarchic empire should continue to exist; all their issues, arguments and histrionics revolve around *HOW* it should exist." medium.com/@caityjohnston…
When you look at US politics, it appears as though there are two mainstream political factions that very strongly disagree with one another. “Divided” is a word that comes up a lot. “Polarized” is another.
But beneath all the hurled insults and heated debates, these two factions are actually furiously agreeing with one another. They’re agreeing the entire time.
They agree that the US should remain the earth’s unipolar hegemon at all cost; they just loudly bicker over some of the specifics in how it should look, like whether there should be the names of Confederate generals on its military bases.
They agree that there should be a massive US military presence around the world; they just furiously dispute small particulars like whether a few thousand of those troops should remain in Germany or be moved to Poland.
They agree that there must be endless mass military violence to uphold the US-centralized empire; they just make a big show of debating whether that military violence should be more focused on Syria or Iran.
They agree that it is necessary to menace the entire planet with nuclear weapons while ramping up aggressions against other nuclear powers; they just rage back and forth about whose finger should be on the button.
They agree that it is necessary to control the world economy with an iron fist; they just squabble about its features, like how and when to roll out a trade war with China.
They agree that the environment should continue to be destroyed; they just fight about the minutia, like whether or not there should be some accommodations made for the profit margins of green energy corporations.
They agree that income and wealth inequality should persist in the US; they just passionately disagree about how it should persist, like whether or not Americans should receive another paltry $1200 stimulus payment this year.
They agree that plutocracy should continue to rule America; they just spar over the minor features, like whether or not those plutocrats should pay a tiny bit more in taxes.
They agree that Americans should remain aggressively propagandized; they just argue about whether it should be by Fox News or MSNBC.
They agree Americans should be closely surveilled and their speech tightly controlled; they just debate the details, like whether or not right-wing pundits are being disproportionately censored on social media.
On all issues that most severely affect real people on mass scale, these two political factions are in emphatic agreement. They just pour a whole lot of sound and fury into the tiny one percent of the spectrum wherein they have some disagreement.
They do not allow for any mainstream discussion of *IF* the oligarchic empire should continue to exist; all their issues, arguments and histrionics revolve around *HOW it should exist.
The real debate in US politics is not between the two mainstream factions which agree with one another on virtually everything that matters. The real debate is those two factions together against those who understand that the entire American status quo needs to be dispensed with.
The real political debate in America is between (A) those who understand that the US empire is the single most destructive force on this planet and is corrupt from root to flower, and (B) those who subscribe to mainstream partisan narratives which by design support the US empire.
If politics were real in America, this would be the debate everyone sees. Not between two murderous septuagenarians yelling over each other about who hates socialism more, but between the side which opposes the oligarchic empire and the side which promotes and protects it.
But politics isn’t real in America. It’s a show. A two-handed sock puppet show to distract the audience while pickpockets rob them blind.
If you want to see things clearly, ignore the fake drama of the sock puppet show altogether and focus on advancing the real debate: that the US-centralized oligarchic empire is corrupt beyond redemption and should be completely overhauled.
*dismantled.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Free Assange,
because the world is growing darker
as the bastards flick the lights off
one by one.
Free Assange,
because the sky is filling with death machines
as mothers weep over small tattered bodies
and the news man talks about rude tweets.
Free Assange,
because they are taking everything from us
and we are becoming voiceless, mindless gear turners
who can only argue about who to bomb next.
WaPo Publishes Paranoid Screed Cautioning Readers Not To Let Russia Make Them Paranoid
“Russia and other adversaries may not need to hack the election if they can hack something else: our minds,” writes the Washington Post editorial board. medium.com/@caityjohnston…
So begins a crazy, paranoid Washington Post editorial titled “The U.S. may be safe from foreign interference in this election. But what about perception hacking?”, cautioning readers not to let Russia make them crazy and paranoid.
“Perception hacking”. Apparently term this is the latest fad for the elite liberal commentariat in the category of noises one can make with one’s face in order to sound well-informed about Russian influence operations, from the same line as “kompromat”.
"Russia and other adversaries may not need to hack the election if they can hack something else: our minds."
From The Washington Post. Democracy Dies in Darkness.
To be clear, this is not just some insane rando who they allowed a spot in their Opinion section. This is bat shit crazy article is by the Washington Post editorial board. washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-u…
All Russiagate Did Was Advance Pre-Existing Agendas Of The Same Spy Agencies Who Started It
"It was started by the same spy agencies which directly benefited from it. Unless you were born yesterday, this will tell you that we've been conned." medium.com/@caityjohnston…
One of the interesting stories that has gotten lost in the shuffle over Trump's recent Covid-19 diagnosis is the recent allegation that CIA director Gina Haspel has been personally blocking the declassification of documents about Russiagate's origins.
Davis’ claim may be true or false, but it’s worth earmarking for later reference given that we already know that longtime CIA insider Haspel has been actively persuading the US president to roll out cold war escalations against Russia, independent.co.uk/news/world/ame…
Response To Trump Covid Diagnosis Shows His ‘Opposition’ Always Saw Him As Part Of The Club
"If you ever had any doubt that Democrats will one day regard Trump the way they now regard George W Bush, you can set that doubt aside." medium.com/@caityjohnston…
The Joe Biden campaign is reportedly taking down all negative ads against the US president due to his recent positive test for Covid-19, despite no indication from the Trump campaign that it intends to do the same.
This would be the same Trump that Dem politicians and pundits have been assuring us is both a Russian agent who is trying to destroy America on orders of Vladimir Putin, and a white nationalist who is trying to eliminate minorities from the US to create a white ethnostate.
The Idiotic Claim That Other Nations Are ‘Disrupting The Public Conversation’ On US Politics
"The idea that any of this could have any effect worth mentioning on the gibbering vortex of irrational vitriol that is US political discourse makes no sense" medium.com/@caityjohnston…
Twitter claims that it has suspended 130 Iranian accounts for “attempting to disrupt the public conversation” during the US presidential debate.
This evidence-free claim aligns with the narrative popularized by Russiagate that foreign governments seek to “sow discord” in the United States by amplifying controversial political opinions from both sides of mainstream US discourse, and it is idiotic for a number of reasons.