countering the spacex origin story, looking at early employees
the spacex origin myth is elon and some rocketry people he cold called went to russia to buy rockets, which they couldnt do so elon said 'ok we will build our own rocket'.
michael griffin was along for the ride, though some accounts of this story dont mention him and some accounts say he was a business partner. so who is mike griffin? lot to say about his work in 80s/90s, but notably around this same time ('02) he became pres of in-q-tel
in the 80s he was deputy of technology for the Stategic Defense Initiative, then worked for orbital sciences corp. he later became head of nasa in '05, and chief technology officer for the department of defense in '17. again, broad strokes just to demonstrate general history
its not surprising that spacex's early talent came from places like orbital sciences and trw, but my speculation is that mike griffin is the true organizer of the spacex project and that it was *his* connections that formed the backbone of the company
another important early employee was Tom Mueller, formerly of TRW. the story is he wasnt fulfilled there and was doing hobby rocket stuff when musk picked him up. the wikipedia
gwynne shotwell is another important early (and long-term) spacex employee, formerly of The Aerospace Corporation which itself is TRW spinoff
again none of this is surprising given the nature of spacex's product, however considering that spacex may not be what it appears to be, its worth reiterating the connections between SDI and TRW and again the presence of mike griffin at spacex's inception
interestingly, this origin myth article tries to say that *jim cantrell* was responsible for the early networking. then he's out of the picture. seems to me much more likely that it was griffin's network that spacex pulled from.
that's funny because the same article paints him as a pariah in the space industry
cantrell apparently left spacex early, and left the industry altogether until around 2013.
i guess ill wrap this up saying that i believe spacex is a front, organized by mike griffin, for some secret project involving many TRW/SDI veterans. so far i am not sure what the exact nature of the project is, though my next step will likely be to examine what spacex *isnt*
*the wikipedia article for TRW states the importance of their veterans for spacex
its been awhile since i've done a proper thread on here, so i thought it was about time to get back to the old ways and just let it rip with no capitalization or editing. i will post the result, properly edited into "article" form, after this is done.
naturally, there have been a lot of comparisons lately between zionism and nazism. and this is of course a correct comparison - but to what degree do we understand the depth of the relationship between these two phenomena?
id like to start by apologizing for the long gap between the previous entry and the current, it was a busy year for me. i wouldnt like to give the impression that these longer-form explorations - which represent a massive improvement from say the earlier threads - take an entire
year to produce, or that such massive delays are necessary. hopefully, i will be more productive with regards to these threads in 2023. i havent finished writing this one, but i think it is time to get started anyway. i am not going to shorten any aspect of it, so bear with me.
@apollosthirdeye to this i would say "yes" with some major caveats. the first one being that "intel" is a label that is imo applied incorrectly here - the fortunes of the drug trade belong to individual members of the ruling class, not to the agencies that work on their behalf. these agencies
@apollosthirdeye simply perform administrative work as a service and extract some kind of fee. not only does the label of 'intel' narrow the scope of the agencies involved - the entire state apparatus is involved - but it confuses the principals of the trade itself.
@apollosthirdeye and this view is very popular of course by design. "military" would be a more appropriate label in terms of the amount of executive burden that they bear imo. but to get back to the point - there *is* something that these elons and fronts are covering up, right? surely. so,
i challenge anyone who is promoting the 'competing factions of the ruling class' to actually outline and explain and substantiate what the factions are and how are they competing and why
and ill be clear on what i mean here because these are vague and unfortunate terms and imo vague and unfortunate framing. 'ruling class' is itself a nebulous term the way it is often used, so lets put a very specific set of definitions on it that can be examined:
definition 1: "terrorist" attacks and mass shootings.
definition 2: root-level decisions such as to run the covid operation and how to shape covid policy, or the "supply chain shortage", or how to manage isis and drug cartels
seeing people gear up to defend russia against false flags despite their obvious complicity in the entire show, that imo is the big iteration here from say syria.
non-rhetorical question, what *is* the value of exposing the millionth painfully obvious paid actor, the beauty blogger in the hospital? it can be instructive to people who are less familiar with psyops, to demonstrate in real time how the news works -
particularly, i think the speed with which they had an actor ready and on the scene is food for thought re: the mechanical process of producing this sort of fodder
there is a broader psychological goal of erasing and reframing that nato of course *is itself* a nazi organization - and that the political block it represents are in fact nazis, true nazis. and that this is the real nazi problem facing the world, not mere "neo" nazis -