The State of California has created a state-run Roth IRA called CalSavers that all employers must offer to their employees in the state if they do not otherwise have a 401k or similar plan.
It is an opt-out program, meaning that the employee will automatically have 5-8% of their pay deducted and sent to the state for safe-keeping unless they explicitly call or write to the state to opt out.
I'm not going to comment on whether it's a good idea for workers to entrust their savings to an entity that can't stop itself from grabbing everyone's wealth, in part because once I'm an employer in the program it's illegal for me to opine on whether employees should participate
Yes, that's right, the first rule for employers that are required by law to join CalSavers is that you can't talk about CalSavers. So I am writing this just ahead of joining.
The part that really tickled me as an employer is how the state advertises that this program has no cost to the employer. LOL, I knew this would be a fairy tale even before I looked into the detail. As it turns out, here is just some of what employers have to do:
1. Provide the CalSavers program administrator with personal information for each eligible employee, within 30 days of registering in the program. The program administrator will then use the supplied data to contact eligible employees and inform them about CalSavers
2. Make sure each eligible employee gets an information packet from CalSavers
3. Determine the correct payroll deduction rate for each eligible employee
4. Deduct each employee’s Roth IRA contributions from their gross wages
5. Send employees’ deducted contributions to the program administrator within 7 days of making the deductions
6. Add new employees as they become eligible and remove employees who no longer work for your business
I called our payroll company. They have a module that will manage this, and it will only cost me $6 each for my 1000 employees per month, or $72,000 a year. Or I can hire a clerk to manage this all internally.

LOL, no cost
This is typical of most State actors, where any regulation or requirement that does not actually charge the citizen money directly is called "free," regardless of administrative costs
The real irony is that our employees in CA are mostly all over 55 years old. Because our labor model is to hire retired people. So I am faced with spending tens of thousands of dollars to offer a retirement savings program to retired people.
As is legally required under CA state law, the following is presented without any recommendation.
The CA Public Employees' Retirement System earned a net annualized return of 6.3% for the five years ended June 30, 8.5% over 10 years and 5.5% in the 20-year period. The pension fund produced an average annual return of 8% over the 30 year-time frame pionline.com/pension-funds/…
State of CA earned 8.5% over 10 years and 6.3% over five years.

Vanguard S&P index fund (VFINX) earned 13.6% over 10 years and 14% over 5 years.

Vanguard 60-40 stock-bond index fund (VBIAX) up 9.73% over 10 years and 10.1% for the last 5 years.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Coyoteblog

Coyoteblog Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Coyoteblog

29 Sep
I know zero about the details of Trump's taxes. But it is perfectly possible to use the tax code exactly as Congress intended & pay little or no tax for years on strong cash income. One common reason is reinvesting profits with accelerated depreciation
coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/20…
"This is what everyone is calling a "loophole" but I think that is a misnomer. "Loophole" implies people are taking advantage of some drafting error or unanticipated use of an IRS rule. That happens all the time, but our example is not an unanticipated use. "
"In our example we are using IRS rules exactly as Congress intended -- the company is being rewarded by Congress for the investment it made in new equipment with a multi-year tax deferral."
Read 4 tweets
24 Sep
Your late night climate test: Which is the following numbers is closest to the actual current concentration of CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere. (many of my readers will get it right, but forward it to friends and most will get it wrong)
Please do not mock those who are very wrong. Years ago Steve Martin had a routine where he suggested how funny it would be to teach your kids to speak wrong. They would show up the first day at school and say "Mumbo dogface in the banana patch?"
Most Americans, including a lot of blue check marks like our new friend @warrenleightTV are like little children purposely taught wrong or islanders struggling for meaning using a cargo cult.
Read 6 tweets
24 Sep
Well, first, I do apologize for being a twitter pr*ck which is a reason I am trying to give Twitter up.

Second, I AM angry at the misuse of data & science vis a vis COVID, defending science while actually abusing it.

Third, you are wrong. @markbspiegel
I know you are wrong because rather than trust media outlets like ABC, who have terrible credentials for handling data well AND have the incentive to exaggerate bad things, I have gone to many state web sites and checked their actual data methodology, as I did here first
Here is the daily death definition from the MO website:

"New Deaths Reported in the Last 24 Hours. The number of new deaths between yesterday’ count and
today’s. This is based on the date that the death was reported to DHSS and may reflect individuals who
died previously."
Read 11 tweets
22 Sep
This is the sort of thing that makes us libertarians nuts. Sure, we will criticize the Republicans for their authoritarianism on multiple fronts. But this is a classic authoritarianism for me but not for thee arugment
The authors imply R authoritarianism is unique or substantially greater than authoritarianism on the Left. This is crazy. This year, mainly Democrat governors have shut down most businesses & locked people in their homes from MONTHS -- this has been unprecedented authoritarianism
In fact, in this election Democrats like Biden are running against Trump and Republicans specifically for being insufficiently authoritarian vis a vis COVID.
Read 6 tweets
18 Sep
Minor life epiphany: When I realized a) that it was OK to tie shoe laces in patterns other than the standard criss cross and that it feels better on my foot to do so; b) what those little "extra" holes for shoelaces are for.
This is what those mystery holes are for. Tied in the way shown in the video, they really make a big difference particularly if you have heel slip issues.

Sorry, black on black on black is not easy to see, but I skip some spaces to give me more space for a high arch (or hump, if said in a Clouseau voice) and because I like more room in the toe area and then use the extra lace to do the thing in the video above Image
Read 4 tweets
18 Sep
Well, you got me thinking because I greatly respect your work and writing on first amendment rights.

I guess I would ask in return if someone walks into a police station and confesses to a crime, is the resulting arrest punishing him for his speech?
Because racism in federally funded universities is a crime. No different, I suppose, than a corporate CEO writing a public letter that his company is full of fraudulent accounting and insider trading. Is it anti-free-speech to then investigate that company?
Perhaps another answer is that few people truly expect PU to be punished but enjoy the calling out of an obvious hypocrisy. Eisgruber was participating in this weird Maoist Kabuki dance of racist self-shaming that we are supposed to take seriously and not seriously simultaneously
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!