On September 28, Peter Stackpole held a fundraising event for @FanonRucker at his home.

Together with Zachary Gottesman, Stackpole is making a play for the very lucrative police union contract. Image
Controversial FOP head Dan Hils endorsed the Gottesman Group as a more "aggressive, hungry" legal firm, who promises to use controversial "innovative ideas," including "proactive and aggressive civil litigation."

fopcounsel.com/app/uploads/20…
Hils: "These parties need to be dealt with aggressively and publicly. To be blunt they need to be sued every time they sneeze! When you mess with us, we will mess with you should be our message."

cincinnati.com/story/news/202…
Stackpole and Gottesman have already begun their campaign to stifle police criticism and chill complaints. In Ryan Olthaus vs. Niesen et al, they brought a SLAPP suit against citizens precisely for the content of their complaints to the CCA before they were even investigated.
We call on @FanonRucker to condemn Peter Stackpole's litigious crusade to intimidate citizens, undermine the Citizen's Citizen Complaint Authority and Collaborative Agreement, and return the campaign funds raised by Stackpole on his behalf.

facebook.com/FanonRuckerFor…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with friends of Bones

friends of Bones Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FriendsofBones

3 Oct
Ryan Olthaus, "Officer suing for defamation admits to showing 'OK' sign, but said it was innocent reason."

"See, we're not racists."

"Proud Boys Did Nothing Wrong!"

local12.com/news/local/off… Image
"Their founder, Gavin McInnes, went so far as to file a defamation lawsuit against the Southern Poverty Law Center when the SPLC designated the Proud Boys a hate group."

Gottesman might want to get in on this.

adl.org/resources/back…
Ryan Olthaus celebrated this late May violent, lawless Portland street brawl just a week before the City Hall incident as "Patriots kicking the shit out of antifa, enjoy!"

Quite a few black and yellow Fred Perrys can be seen among Olthaus' "patriots".

facebook.com/friendsofBones…
Read 6 tweets
18 Sep
Butler retired this year but the courts allowed him one last grift on the way out. Butler is no stranger to litigation, but this one was a masterclass in cop caucacity.

Let's have a closer look at his tortured, tortious career.

fox19.com/2020/09/18/cin…
At the center of Butler's suit against the city were claims of defamation as a racist and illegal abuse in a police overtime audit.

Butler should know about overtime fraud. He practically invented it himself as a sergeant in 1998.

citybeat.com/home/article/1…
During the 1999 internal investigation into his overtime grift, as Butler was interviewed by his friend then Sgt. Russel Neville, and he thought the tape recorder was turned off, he was caught on video saying "Go get my gun so I can lock up some n-gg-rs."

citybeat.com/news/article/1…
Read 10 tweets
16 Sep
This lawsuit is for defamation and false light publicity, so the evidence is necessarily comprised of public statements. Take the quotes from the public complaint and plug them into your social media platform of choice.

Spoiler: M.R. is Ryan Olthaus.

drive.google.com/file/d/1nqmqnw…
Widespread public attention? 210 comments. 121 shares.

facebook.com/juliemniesen/p… Image
"white supremacist kkkop":
facebook.com/treewhite83/po…

"white supremacist piece of shit"
facebook.com/21421949/video…

The clip in the post is from the council meeting in question:
archive.org/details/102006…

8 other speakers that day corroborated White's account:
Image
Read 8 tweets
8 Sep
This, buried all the way at the bottom, is central to the Gottesman pitch for the FOP contract:

“Other FOP members are losing money they can never recover because are on extended restricted duty because FOP counsel has failed to act on their behalf.”

fox19.com/2020/09/04/ami…
The idea is that cops are fundamentally 𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙩𝙡𝙚𝙙 to pimp the badge off-duty for lucrative overtime gigs at Krogers etc. If their police powers are suspended, say, for dropping N-bombs on citizens, the taxpayer owes them the difference. Because 𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙩𝙡𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩!
"…officers work extra duty details and take advantage of overtime opportunities, some depend on this extra income. Both Officer Hill and Officer Barnette have been deprived of these opportunities and income for months, equating to thousands of dollars."

fox19.com/2019/04/26/off…
Read 4 tweets
19 Aug
It was Ryan Olthaus who made the controversial arrest in council chambers on June 24
facebook.com/brianna.bernar…

It's worth watching the whole meeting. Cranley botched the speaker cards, then ordered police to arrest citizens who were still waiting their turn
archive.org/details/102006…
More video of Ryan Olthaus appearing in a public meeting in his public capacity as a uniformed police officer.

wcpo.com/news/local-new…
WCPO redacted the middle finger in this longer video, but the middle finger wasn't Ryan Olthaus'.

wcpo.com/news/local-new…
Read 7 tweets
16 Aug
UCLA law prof: "My excellent pro bono local counsel @jeffreynye and I have put together an updated motion in this case, which is now captioned M.R., a Cincinnati Police Officer v. Niesen."

[1.] The affidavit should be unsealed
[2.] The plaintiff must proceed under his real name
"[1.] The affidavit should be unsealed.

"The plaintiff is a public official who is not only trying to silence a critic—he has gotten a prior restraint against the further publication of his name, and he is seeking a broader prior restraint as well."

reason.com/2020/08/13/my-…
'"The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that police officers are public officials," Soke v. The Plain Dealer (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 395, 397, and the public has an interest in "anything which might touch on a[ public] official's fitness for office."'
Read 27 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!