Returning to yesterday’s discussion of B Teams, it’s important not just to recognise why it’s bad for the pyramid, but to understand the underlying motives of the Premier League and just how damaging they are to football generally.
#BTeamBoycott
1/
The problem in its simplest terms is that the biggest teams want to abolish competition. They desire a situation – as in Spain, Germany, Scotland, France – where who finishes top is preordained.
2/
That gives predictable access to more TV money and the riches of the UCL. A sport where the winners are a foregone conclusion is no longer a sport, but rather entertainment.
3/
Given that player talent is the biggest determinant of success, the question is how can they get access to the best players without the cost and risk of signing expensive players? Again, the aim is predictable success without the inherent unpredictability of sport.
4/
The answer, of course, is invest in youth. On the back of blackmailing EFL clubs into accepting EPPP, which abolished the 90-minute travel rule and allowed top rated academies earlier access to young talent, top PL teams have built huge academies.
5/
They scout players who are little more than toddlers and, by the time they are young men, they gather them in their hundreds in their academies. The problem is that young players, no matter how talented, make mistakes and can’t reliably and flawlessly step into the first team.
6/
City and Chelsea have tried to manage this with formal and semi-formal arrangements with overseas clubs. Problem is the players can’t be closely supervised, learn from the first team or get the high level competitive fixtures their development requires.
7/
The purpose of B Teams, then, is to abolish the bedding in period. They intend to monopolise all the best talent, playing it where they can and profiting by selling the players who don’t make it. They want to be at 100% every game, every year. No rebuilds.
8/
B Teams are central to this because they allow top Premier League teams to move from having 100+ under 18s aiming to break directly into a first team squad of world class players, to having a bridge – a second squad in the same building playing 50 competitive games a year.
9/
Only the wealthiest clubs will be able to afford this, which means that B Teams change the current system, where wealth allows clubs to monopolise success, so we have two categories of football clubs and only those in the top category will ever be able to compete for honours.
10/
They will also create a precedent for what happens when the top clubs join a European Super League: their first team will leave, but they will retain a league place with the aim of hoovering up both the new European league money and what remains of domestic TV money.
11/
B Teams, then, aim to:
-prevent smaller clubs from developing and selling talent
-allow the wealthiest clubs to spend less on transfers while continuing to dominate the game and its financial rewards
-end change at the top of the PL
-smooth the way for a Euro Super League
12/
Even if you don’t care about creating a permanent second-class status for 99% of English football, it should be clear that what B Teams represent isn’t just an anti-competitive development in the financial sense, but something that strikes at the heart of English football.
13/
If B Teams get the go ahead - by exploiting the crisis to blackmail desperate clubs - one of the most unique and important thing about our game will be destroyed. All so a few clubs can make sure no one else ever gets a taste of glory or a chance to grow.
14/14
PS: With so many clubs on the brink, it's grotesque that, instead of focusing on the bailout, different factions are wasting time trying to remake English football to their advantage, either with a PL2 or B Teams. It's time to act like club custodians not disaster capitalists.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with theuglygame

theuglygame Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @uglygame

8 Oct
Never been more grateful for the presence of a paywall.
#BTeamBoycott Image
All the evidence is fans don't want B Teams - they reduce attendances - so they aren't a solution to football's sustainability problem. Proposing B Teams only helps if PL teams are prepared to pay to have them. Which, of course, makes the EFL even more dependent on the PL.
B Teams have nothing to do with sustainability. They are about the wealthy abolishing smaller clubs so they can hoard young players. It's the football equivalent of suggesting that we could alleviate poverty by allowing the unemployed to sell their kidneys.
Read 6 tweets
7 Oct
Given that accepting B Teams into the EFL Trophy drastically reduced crowds and the competion now only survives financially because of a Premier League subsidy, the idea that accepting B Teams into the league would help sustainably should be seen for what it is: a convenient lie.
It's a zombie idea: no matter how often it's rejected and the supposed justifications shown to be false, it just keeps coming back. Ultimately there is only one reason for B Teams, and it's a bad one. Top Premier League teams want to kill competition and entrench their advantage.
There is no future for the EFL in becoming practice matches for the Premier League youth teams. Imagine destroying over a century of history just because City and Chelsea would prefer not to have to send their hordes of youngster on loan.
Read 11 tweets
7 Oct
Haven't seen 'rebel' deployed this way - as a synonym for 'greedy and unprincipled' - since Gooch led a 'rebel' tour of South Africa, in breach of the cultural boycott, with Boycott, to protest at the lack of rands in his bank account.
telegraph.co.uk/football/2020/…
While obviously wishing nothing but hellfire, plague and complete financial ruin on any owner who supports a breakaway, I'm intrigued by the idea that now is a good time - that they can get a better deal during Covid by cutting the throats of their sibling clubs. Greedy bastards.
During a crisis seems like a poor time to be making decisions like this, not least I can't see a TV station ponying up enough to make all the upheaval worth it. That said, this is English football; it's so obviously a bad idea, it'll probably happen.
Read 6 tweets
6 Oct
Watching the Premier League dragging its heels over supporting the rest of the pyramid, and one owner actually denying any obligation to help support other clubs, made me think of a really interesting report I read a while back on the Premier League and its impact on the game.
1/
It highlighted the social importance of football and how all elements of the pyramid contribute to the Premier League's continuing financial growth.
2/ Image
It also diagrammed how solidarity payments to smaller clubs have been part of the Premier League's 'cycle of grow'.
3/ Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!