“Any suggestion that the Bell case will somehow ‘destroy’ Gillick competence and deny 15 year old girls the right to contraception or abortion, is simply wrong.”
This BMJ article reminds us not to conflate the two:
For an in-depth family law perspective on consent/capacity see this training module from Lyndsey Sambrooks-Wright, barrister, hosted by Family Law Weekly (free sample of the podcast is available):
Gearing up to watch @publiclawprojct talk on Gender Recognition cases as part of PLP's (fab) week-long Equality Act bumper special. Headed up by barristers Sarah Hannett (Matrix) and Claire McCann (Cloisters).
I will try to live tweet along with hashtag #GenderRecEA10YearsOn
Overview of the domestic law framework first - that is the GRA 2004, EA 2010, HRA 1998 (art 8 and 14). "Worth emphasising that the take-up of GRCs is pretty modest" says SH. #GenderRecEA10YearsOn
Overview of case of Carpenter [2015] EWHC 464 (Admin).
No requirement of treatment (surgical or medical) but any treatment undertaken must be evidenced by a doctor. #GenderRecEA10YearsOn