New - Pelosi and Raskin to introduce bill creating a commission to review President’s health and fitness for office. This is what she was referring to when she referred to 25th Amendment. She’s having a press conference tomorrow
They're introducing a bill that appears to be based on what Raskin has proposed in the past.
In Raskin's previous bill, it would establish a bipartisan commission that would -- at the direction of Congress -- carry out a medical examination of the President
“to determine whether he is "mentally or physically unable to discharge the powers and duties of the office." The 11-member commission would be appointed by leaders of the House and Senate. The commission in his past bill would be required to report its findings to Congress.
Under section 4 of the 25th Amendment, it says either a Vice President and a majority of the Cabinet or the VP and a majority of another body "as Congress may by law provide" can determine if the President is unable to do his job.
Commission would report those findings to Hill
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
New: In S.C., Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham says this morning that confirmation hearings for Amy Coney Barett are “on track.” He said they are still going to start Oct. 12. He said he spoke this AM to Trump who was in “good spirits” and Trump asked about the hearings
“I talked to President Trump this morning. ... First thing I asked him about was the First Lady. She’s doing good. The President was in good spirits. The first thing he asked me is how’s the hearings going? I said we’re on track. We’re going to start October the 12th,” he said
Graham: “And we’re going to work hard to get this wonderful conservative young lady talented beyond belief, Amy Barrett, on the Supreme Court.”
GOP reaction to Trump refusal to commit to a peaceful transition: Many downplaying it, insisting there will be a peaceful transition while others point to Hillary Clinton’s remarks suggesting that Biden “should not concede under any circumstances,” though she’s not the candidate
Tillis on Trump: “Look there's going to be an orderly transition of power but if you've got spare time today go ask every Democrat member and ask them if they stand with Hillary Clinton who says that Biden shouldn't accept the result under any circumstances if he doesn't win.”
Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham downplayed it, saying: “It will happen,” referring to an orderly transition. “I’m not worried about that. It’s the least of my concerns,” he told me
Ernst in 2016: “In the midst of a critical election, the American people deserve to have a say in this important decision that will impact the course of our country for years to come.”
Asked by @tedbarrettcnn multiple times about that past statement, Ernst ignored the questions
Rubio in the Capitol in 2016: "I don't think we should be moving forward on a nominee in the last year of this President's term. I would say that if it was a Republican president."
After saying in late July he wouldn’t favor moving ahead with a nomination this election year, Grassley signals he’s on McConnell’s side. “If the shoe were on the other foot, Senate Democrats wouldn’t hesitate to use their Constitutional authority ... to fill this seat.”
Grassley: “The circumstances are different in 2020, where the American people elected a Republican President and Senate in 2016 and expanded the Republican Senate majority in 2018.”
Grassley told me in late July when asked if he would support filling a vacancy this year: “My position is if I were chairman of the committee, I couldn't move forward with it.”
New - Lisa Murkowksi opposes taking up a SCOTUS nomination before Election Day, reiterating the same stance as before RBG death. That means there are two Republicans who have voiced this position - her and Susan Collins. Two more and that’s enough to punt to lame-duck session.
Murkowksi: “For weeks, I have stated that I would not support taking up a potential Supreme Court vacancy this close to the election. Sadly, what was then a hypothetical is now our reality, but my position has not changed.”
“I did not support taking up a nomination eight months before the 2016 election to fill the vacancy created by the passing of Justice Scalia. We are now even closer to the 2020 election – less than two months out – and I believe the same standard must apply,” she says