Every single reporter demanding that Joe Biden answer a question but not demanding Pence/Trump answer a perfectly straightforward question about abortion bans in a post-Roe world is demonstrating their own bias.
The question Harris didn't answer last night was a question that *Mike Pence asked her so that he could duck the moderator's question about abortion rights* and the entire news media is helping Pence, revealing their own biases.
This little feeding-frenzy is a wonderful example of how reporters carry water for Republicans.
Pence ducked a moderator question about abortion, asking Harris an unrelated question to distract from it. Reporters privilege Pence's dodge by making the story about Biden/Harris.
Mike Pence dodged a debate question about banning abortion. Amy Coney Barrett failed to disclose talks on Roe in her Senate paperwork.
Maybe it’s time for reporters to start obsessively asking *Republicans* why they won’t answer these questions.
It’s really fascinating that the political press corps is so dismissive of the importance of women’s rights that they’re helping Mike Pence duck a question about whether he’d support a ban on all abortion.
There’s your answer, reporters. Now maybe you should ask Trump and Pence about whether they’d support total abortion bans if the SCOTUS they’re packing overturns Roe.
This is actually because reporters are eagerly carrying water for the GOP out of some combination of stupidity, malice, boredom, and delusion that behaving like this will convince Republicans to drop their insincere attacks on the media.
PENCE: *dodges moderator question, asks Harris a question to avoid answering his own*
HARRIS: *doesn’t answer*
REPORTERS: omgomgomgomg Biden/Harris are dodging this question!1!!1!
REPORTERS: Wow, Republicans really drove the conversation. They’re so good at politics!
The other absurdity of all of this is that Mitch McConnell can, if he wants to, make it highly unlikely that Democrats expand the court. All McConnell has to do is simply *decide not to carry out an illegitimate power grab* and momentum for expansion would slow considerably.
To be clear, regardless of what McConnell does, the Supreme Court is undemocratic in composition (14 of last 18 justices nominated by party that lost 6 of last 7 popular votes) and in action (gutted Voting Rights Act, for e.g.) so I want to expand & rebalance it regardless. But…
Democrats probably won’t do that unless GOP fills the current vacancy before the next president is sworn in, thus making their unprecedented power grab undeniable.
So, really, it’s up to McConnell. To my dismay, he can probably prevent expansion by just doing the right thing.
If 9 is sacred to Republicans, all they need to do is hold this vacancy for the winner of the presidential election, and we’ll likely have 9 justices with a 5-4 conservative majority.
But 9 isn’t sacred to Republicans — only power is. So here we are.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This article contains no actual data. If you click through to the Gallup poll it links, you find a negligible gender gap, and *89 percent of men wearing masks.*
Women are doing better than men, but this article badly exaggerates the gap & normalizes Trump as typical of men.
Stop linking to bullshit articles that make broad claims without offering any data to back them up and in the process make the deadly behavior of our asshole president seem like an inevitable and natural result of genetics. Thank you!
Screenshots 1-3: The New York Times pretending that men reject mass wearing in large numbers, while presenting no data.
Screenshot 4: Gallup poll finding *89 percent of men wear masks,* which NYT links to as though it supports NYT’s point.
Incidentally, Bob Dole not only voted against creating Medicare, he *bragged about it* while running for president in 1996, a campaign in which he also compared smoking to drinking milk.
Bob Dole is very bad, and has always been very bad.
Remember, if you’re writing an article or column about this debate that portrays both candidates as having behaved shabbily, you could instead simply tattoo “I am Dumb” on your forehead and make the same point in fewer words.
Hello, journalists! Please read @creynoldsnc’s excellent piece, to which I will only add the attached screenshot of something I wrote 14 years ago, nearly to the day. More true than ever!
particularly if the media covers it as “wow, that’s probably effective” (a worthless assertion even if true, but also completely speculative and probably false) rather than “here are seven ways Trump lied” (verifiable facts of value to readers/viewers!)