Every single reporter demanding that Joe Biden answer a question but not demanding Pence/Trump answer a perfectly straightforward question about abortion bans in a post-Roe world is demonstrating their own bias.
The question Harris didn't answer last night was a question that *Mike Pence asked her so that he could duck the moderator's question about abortion rights* and the entire news media is helping Pence, revealing their own biases.

This little feeding-frenzy is a wonderful example of how reporters carry water for Republicans.

Pence ducked a moderator question about abortion, asking Harris an unrelated question to distract from it. Reporters privilege Pence's dodge by making the story about Biden/Harris.
Mike Pence dodged a debate question about banning abortion. Amy Coney Barrett failed to disclose talks on Roe in her Senate paperwork.

Maybe it’s time for reporters to start obsessively asking *Republicans* why they won’t answer these questions.

It’s really fascinating that the political press corps is so dismissive of the importance of women’s rights that they’re helping Mike Pence duck a question about whether he’d support a ban on all abortion.

Just a reminder: your bias is showing.
There’s your answer, reporters. Now maybe you should ask Trump and Pence about whether they’d support total abortion bans if the SCOTUS they’re packing overturns Roe.
This is actually because reporters are eagerly carrying water for the GOP out of some combination of stupidity, malice, boredom, and delusion that behaving like this will convince Republicans to drop their insincere attacks on the media.

PENCE: *dodges moderator question, asks Harris a question to avoid answering his own*

HARRIS: *doesn’t answer*

REPORTERS: omgomgomgomg Biden/Harris are dodging this question!1!!1!

REPORTERS: Wow, Republicans really drove the conversation. They’re so good at politics!
The other absurdity of all of this is that Mitch McConnell can, if he wants to, make it highly unlikely that Democrats expand the court. All McConnell has to do is simply *decide not to carry out an illegitimate power grab* and momentum for expansion would slow considerably.
To be clear, regardless of what McConnell does, the Supreme Court is undemocratic in composition (14 of last 18 justices nominated by party that lost 6 of last 7 popular votes) and in action (gutted Voting Rights Act, for e.g.) so I want to expand & rebalance it regardless. But…
Democrats probably won’t do that unless GOP fills the current vacancy before the next president is sworn in, thus making their unprecedented power grab undeniable.

So, really, it’s up to McConnell. To my dismay, he can probably prevent expansion by just doing the right thing.
If 9 is sacred to Republicans, all they need to do is hold this vacancy for the winner of the presidential election, and we’ll likely have 9 justices with a 5-4 conservative majority.

But 9 isn’t sacred to Republicans — only power is. So here we are.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jamison Foser

Jamison Foser Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jamisonfoser

11 Oct
This article contains no actual data. If you click through to the Gallup poll it links, you find a negligible gender gap, and *89 percent of men wearing masks.*

Women are doing better than men, but this article badly exaggerates the gap & normalizes Trump as typical of men. ImageImageImage
Stop linking to bullshit articles that make broad claims without offering any data to back them up and in the process make the deadly behavior of our asshole president seem like an inevitable and natural result of genetics. Thank you!
Screenshots 1-3: The New York Times pretending that men reject mass wearing in large numbers, while presenting no data.

Screenshot 4: Gallup poll finding *89 percent of men wear masks,* which NYT links to as though it supports NYT’s point.

Extremely dishonest! ImageImageImageImage
Read 6 tweets
9 Oct
The Commission on Presidential Debates has had a Republican who worked for Ronald Reagan as its executive director for every day of its existence.

But thank you for the reminder that the aspiring fascist in the White House is losing Republican support.

Incidentally, Bob Dole not only voted against creating Medicare, he *bragged about it* while running for president in 1996, a campaign in which he also compared smoking to drinking milk.

Bob Dole is very bad, and has always been very bad.

Oh okay one more Bob Dole tweet. Here’s my all-time favorite campaign ad:
Read 7 tweets
30 Sep
1)Trump has never had a net positive approval rating for a single day of his presidency so I don’t know what this guy thinks “popularity” means.

2) there are actual polls that tell us what “regular” people thought of the debate, and they thought Biden win.

3) projection!
If you mean white people, just say white people.
Also Wikipedia tells me this guy grew up in New York City. I grew up in a rural town of 300 people. Fuck this.
Read 8 tweets
30 Sep
Remember, if you’re writing an article or column about this debate that portrays both candidates as having behaved shabbily, you could instead simply tattoo “I am Dumb” on your forehead and make the same point in fewer words.
Trash
Updated headline is still trash
Read 6 tweets
30 Sep
My debate analysis is that Donald Trump is a goddamn asshole.
“The fact is this man doesn’t know what he’s talking about” is the line of the night.
though "will you shut up, man" is a close second.
Read 5 tweets
29 Sep
Hello, journalists! Please read @creynoldsnc’s excellent piece, to which I will only add the attached screenshot of something I wrote 14 years ago, nearly to the day. More true than ever!

Image
particularly if the media covers it as “wow, that’s probably effective” (a worthless assertion even if true, but also completely speculative and probably false) rather than “here are seven ways Trump lied” (verifiable facts of value to readers/viewers!)
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!