This is the home of Joseph Morrison, one of the Michigan men recently arrested for his plot to kidnap Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.

Can we acknowledge that maybe economic circumstances play a role in radicalizing people?
No one is fated to be a far right terrorist. This is learned and fostered by governmental neglect.

We need to make sure that people feel they have a real stake in society.

When Trump took office, 40% of the population was struggling to afford basics.
We are reaping what we've sowed over four decades of trickle-down neoliberal policies. We've brought America's population to the brink. In 2019, it was reported that 78% of full-time workers were living paycheck-to-paycheck.
Now, thanks to COVID, the Trump administration's abysmal handling of the crisis, and Congressional inaction, things are far worse. We've seen unemployment skyrocket. More than 30 million jobs lost and with them, health care.

Of course, we're going to see violence.
The far right and white nationalist groups feed on disaffection. They tie cultural resentment to economic circumstance. That's how they operate.
Ever seriously consider why people who live like this aren’t the ones who take up arms against their government?

Are they just born better people? Or could it be that they’ve benefitted more from the system and government is responsive to their demands (bc they own DC)?
This shouldn’t be controversial. Multiple reports and studies have found a link between deprivation/scarcity/perceived scarcity and radicalization.

A 2016 study found long-term deprivation fueled right wing terrorism. 2009 DHS report warned recession fueled right-wing extremism
A 2008 report from the European Commission’s Expert Group on Violent Radicalisation warned unfair competition over scarce resources or lack of future prospects—feelings of rejection combined with limited social capital—can turn young people towards militancy and terrorism.
Even taking it out of the context of militant groups, we see an undeniable link between economic disparity and violence playing out all over the U.S.
If you ask some about violence in inner cities, they correctly point to economic conditions as a driving factor. But when it comes to militancy in rural America, they refuse to entertain a similar explanation.

We like to believe in monsters and our superiority to them.
Admittedly, this topic is personal to me as a Jew with family members whose names are lost to history because of a man named Hitler, who rose to power exploiting Germany's resentment following WWI and the Treaty of Versailles as well as its destitution from the Great Depression.
I feel it's worth having this discussion because the plotters took aim at Whitmer over COVID restrictions, which many on the right see, not as necessary to keep the public safe, but the reason why the economy is fucked--and perhaps their own finances with it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Walker Bragman

Walker Bragman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WalkerBragman

9 Oct
It is truly remarkable how many people on here viscerally reject the idea that our staggeringly unequal economy is in any way contributing to the rise of far-right extremism.

Luckily, you don't have to take my word for it (thread)
Here's a 2009 DHS report with a clear warning that "prolonged economic downturn...could create a fertile recruiting environment for rightwing extremists and even result in confrontations between such groups and government authorities..." fas.org/irp/eprint/rig… Image
Here's a 2008 report from the European Commission warning that "unfair competition for scarce resources or an absence of prospects for a good future" are paths to "militancy and terrorism." clingendael.org/sites/default/… Image
Read 12 tweets
10 Sep
Donald Trump called dead soldiers losers.
Kamala Harris could be America’s first black woman VP
Nancy Pelosi tore up Donald Trump’s speech
Read 7 tweets
12 Aug
As media combs her record, it’s time to talk about Kamala Harris’ “Back on Track” re-entry program for first-time, nonviolent drug sales offenders. It was nowhere near as successful as media has painted it.

A thread. jacobinmag.com/2019/09/kamala…
Harris’ stated aim with Back on Track was to reduce prison overcrowding. But rather than overcriminalization, Harris had a theory.

As she told a crowd in 2010, “the one most effective issue we could address on this issue of prison overcrowding, is this issue of recidivism.”
Back on Track was really a pilot program designed to prove that recidivism could be reduced.

With that in mind, what Harris’ office did was select a narrow group of offenders—young, first-time, nonviolent drug sales offenders—and cull from there those deemed likely to succeed.
Read 16 tweets
29 May
The push to reopen is a testament to GOP‘s messaging power. There is no treatment or vaccine for COVID; no herd immunity. The safe path would be an ongoing national shutdown where government provides enough assistance to keep Americans afloat.

Dems are too weak to fight for that
Trump wants to reopen for obvious reasons. It’s an election year and the economy is awful—some 40 million have lost their jobs and their insurance; small businesses devastated.

Dems are afraid to act bc it’s an election year and they’re terrified of being branded big government.
There’s also little incentive to act because the man in the White House is Donald Trump.
Read 5 tweets
29 May
Social media platforms like Twitter are effectively the new public square. They are too ubiquitous and too integral to our national discourse to have their content governed by private companies.

At the same time, what Trump tweeted could be incitement.
Twitter's rules against "glorifying violence" are, in fact, extremely arbitrary. I've shared images and videos of the humanitarian disaster in Yemen and had the tweets removed by Twitter on those grounds.

That said, again, what Trump tweeted could be incitement.
Ideally, social media platforms would be treated as public forums and content limited only by the First Amendment.

However, even in such a world, Trump's tweet might not be protected...if it were found to be incitement.
Read 5 tweets
30 Apr
The sexual assault allegation against Joe Biden, which is dividing the party and making Democrats look hypocritical, is only the beginning. There is not a single line of attack they have on Donald Trump that isn't undermined by Biden's record.
How do you hit Trump on his rape allegations when Biden is accused of rape?

How do you hit him for cutting social programs when Biden spent 40 years fighting to cut SS?

How do you hit him on kids in cages when Biden was VP under Obama?
How do you call out Trump on trade when Biden supported NAFTA, PNTR, and the TPP?

How do you criticize him on health care when Biden doesn't have a universal health care plan?

How do you hit him on his right-wing judges when Biden put Thomas and Scalia on the court?
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!