Very interesting @ifgevents this morning on the future of UK-EU security cooperation. Key thing is: crime knows no borders. Hence it is absolutely crucial for the UK to exit the transition period with an arrangement in place in that area. Read more 👇
1/ For NI, Naomi Long says discussions of a possible land border has increased political tension and she is worried border checks will become a target for violence.
2/ Very important not to jeopardise excellent security relationship with RoI and wider EU - key to upholding the Good Friday Agreement and fighting organised crime and terrorism.
3/ Julian King says there is a deal to be done in area of security. Key issues to resolve are around role of ECJ, fundamental rights and data but possible to build a relationship. BUT emphasises relationship won't be the same the UK used to enjoy.
4/ While UK might keep access to certain databases, some EU security databases such as Schengen Information System will be off limit. This is a big deal he says and the UK will need to try and replicate those separately.
5/ Schengen Information System is the most widely used and largest information sharing system in Europe. It shares alerts between front line offices, border forces etc to keep us all safe.
Not having access to this in the future is very worrying...
6/ As Rob Wainwright states, live time data sharing is key and at the heart of modern police operations. Europol links over 1000 law enforcement teams in different countries. The UK played a big part in setting this system up...
7/ Patrick Calvar, former Director General of French Interior Security says economy and security issues should be dealt separately in the negotiations. We all stand to lose if we have no UK-EU arrangements in place in the area of security come 1st January 2021.
8/ No deal on security would have a big detrimental impact - as Julian King highlights, crazy to think that if no arrangements, UK will not be able to know who comes in airports, nor would it be able to have extradition arrangements (examples amongst many others).
9/ Real-time data sharing is crucial in the field of security. A lack of security cooperation between UK-EU could lead to catastrophic consequences, the development of organised crime and heightening of tensions around NI border.
10/ As Sir Rob Wainwright notes, we hope an agreement can be found which will provide continuity and act as bridge towards future UK-EU cooperation in the field of security. This is in the best interest of all of us.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Pundits are formulating increasingly convoluted, bellicose justifications for the UK breaching int’l law (eg. @benhabib6 on Sky claiming this is an “annexation” of Northern Ireland by the EU). It might be useful to have a factual thread on the basics, for you to share. 1/8 ~AA
It’s the indefinite nature of the Good Friday (or Belfast) Agreements that tie the UK to the Republic of Ireland (and, by extension, the EU) indefinitely. NOT the Withdrawal Agreement, which was drafted to reflect precisely the UK’s existing guarantees under the GFA. 2/8 ~AA
European Union membership is written explicitly into the GFA, (as is adherence to the European Convention on Human Rights). It envisages integration as not reversible, preceding as it did the Lisbon Treaty and its mechanisms for leaving the EU, by a decade. 3/8 ~AA
Where are UK-EU trade talks at? And should we be worried? Well, according to a major new report by Best for Britain … bestforbritain.org/tradereportcom…
…the picture is a deeply concerning one. The report authors are experienced trade negotiators, operating at very senior levels, and they know their stuff. No shallow sloganeering here
A key challenge facing the EU-UK negotiating teams is that, unlike other Free Trade Agreements, we’re not bringing the parties closer together. In fact …
Have been watching coverage of and punditry on the Barnier/Frost statements on BBC and Sky. There seems to be an awful lot of "reading between the lines" from everyone, driven in large part, it seems to me, by wishful thinking that we are "subtly moving closer to a deal". 1/5 ~AA
The straight reading of what Frost/Barnier say is that there are two sticking points: Fishing and the Level Playing Field. Unless they're resolved, there's no deal. The LPF is not something the EU will give up. Ever for anyone. It is the foundation of the Common Market. 2/5 ~AA
Once this reality becomes clear, a second fact comes into focus: shared standards require an arbitration mechanism. You can call it the ECJ or you can invent one and call it Susan. But it will be there. If you want free access to a market, you will be tied into its rules. 3/5 ~AA
Unlike in most of the countries we hope to sign free trade deals with, our parliament now won’t get a vote on new trade agreements struck by the government, as the amendment was defeated 326-263.
The US Congress for instance, will have the chance to vote on any U.K. -US trade deal. But our parliament won’t. This means power is concentrated in the hands of an executive few. It’s very bad for British democracy.
Other MPs inc Cons also called for British animal welfare and food standards to be protected. That amendment was also stopped with 337 MPs voting against it and just 251 supporting it. To say we are facing a lowering of standards post Brexit is not an over statement.
The government ignored concerns that we wouldn't be ready to end the transition period on 31st December, despite numerous warnings from business and trade bodies. And now this.
This email proves that those concerns were valid, and the senior Cabinet minister trusted with Britain's future trade shares them.
The Department for International Trade must now publish this email and any follow up correspondence so that the British public aren't kept in the dark about what's happening at our borders