STREETS

This is not the explanation of an expert. This is the confession of a fool.

armoxon.com/2020/10/street…
In the months after the 2016 election, still reeling from the permanent demolition of the reality I'd known, I wrote an essay called Sky. It was my lament. armoxon.com/2017/01/sky.ht…
Near the end of the first year, I posted Bubbles, about a nation I’d failed to see, the terrible lies it has been founded upon, the spiritual desire of such terrible lies, and what I perceive as our role, which is to live as good stories, as works of art. armoxon.com/2017/08/bubble…
Here, then, is the next one.

It’s the thing that comes at the end of my four-year revelation of American menace and cruelty. I’m calling it "Streets."

I'll post them as they're ready.

armoxon.com/2020/10/street…
I don’t know what it’s about yet, other than that, like those that came before, it’s about where I’ve arrived, and how we got here, and where I think we should go from here, if we're interested in survival as a nation and a species—an open question, I realize.
The things I’ll be saying are things I’ve learned recently, but they aren’t things recently true. Only my awareness is new. Others have known all these things for a long time—their whole lives. They’ve been telling us about it all along, too, and we haven’t heard until recently.
We? I. I haven’t heard until recently.

Heard? Listened.

I have to conclude we haven’t wanted to know.

We? I.

If you’re one who has been wise to these matters your whole life, I hope my words honor your experience, and I apologize for all the ways they will fail.
If you’re a fool like me, still reeling even four years later from new knowledge of old truths long known, this is for you. I’m hoping to put words to how my frame has moved over four years—about what is broken, and how healing could occur.
Three years ago, I wrote that you don’t move people’s frame through argument or debate, but by telling stories.

I still believe that.

Let me tell you two stories; Here, and Now.
PART I - HERE

We know things about ourselves we hate to know, but there’s no going back. There are two questions we have to face, now that we have this knowledge.

The first question is about knowledge and confession.

It’s this: How did we get here?

armoxon.com/2020/10/street…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with A.R. Moxon—Preorder THE REVISIONARIES In Paperback

A.R. Moxon—Preorder THE REVISIONARIES In Paperback Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JuliusGoat

11 Oct
POLTERGEIST (which scarred my wife as a child) is, in my opinion, good.

Which I wasn't expecting.⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Among the best of a genre I'd call "family horror," which if they still make anymore I'm not aware of them (last one I remember is Arachnophobia). Thrills-not-scares, a bit goofy, pitched in the key of Spielberg (who produced), usually set in a gradually demolished suburbia.
Anyway I thought this wouldn't hold up, but other than a few special effects that I'm guessing weren't the most effective moments of the movie even in 1982, it very much does.

Really dug how absolutely bugfuck Tobe Hooper was allowed to make the final act.
Read 4 tweets
11 Oct
Plenty of people are pointing out the reasons this is nonsense even if the premise of "playing by the rules" were legit.

I'll add this: what we're seeing is an attempted fascist takeover of the government; therefore, we should very much desire unprecedented radical remedy.
Like, yes, sure, fine, he's being disingenuous about how adding seats to the court is outside the rules while also claiming Republican judicial nullification is inside the rules.

But also Republicans are an openly fascist party. Let's get unprecedented, please.
The Republican political "chess" strategy has been methodically stabbing their opponent with a butcher knife, then whining that their opponent's attempt to take their knife away isn't listed among authorized chess moves.
Read 5 tweets
8 Oct
Anyone who's followed me for any amount of time knows that I answer right-wing trolls with a non sequitur "America is a democracy," to demonstrate their reflexive response that we aren't.

I've done it to illustrate exactly how anti-democracy the American fascist party is.
I'm not sure I'm going to use the word "Republican" anymore, given the party is fully committed to ending our Republic—our *democratic* Republic—which is a democracy.

They aren't Republicans worth the name. They're fascists. I believe I'll call them that.

The Fascist Party.
It doesn't have to be done angrily or aggressively. In fact it should be matter-of-fact. It's naming what they are by what they've done and what they're trying to do.

They're the American Fascist Party.
Read 5 tweets
8 Oct
My opinion is Pence "won" the debate simply because the debate happened, and it shouldn't have. Pence was allowed the trappings of normalcy when he should have been in quarantine. He was given a platform that the sort of liar he has proved himself to be should never be afforded.
If Pence doesn't have to be in quarantine, if Trump gets to act like he's not infected, then Senators returning to confirm a justice ahead of the election will also be afforded similar wavers, then thousands or millions of other people so infected will think they can be, too.
The medium is the message. The questions and answers are window dressing. They can be true, they can be lies; it doesn't matter, they'll be hashed over as if they're equal value anyway. Pence knows that, so he uses lies—because lies are what he prefers.

He just wanted the stage.
Read 5 tweets
8 Oct
IT HAPPENED ONE NIGHT is, in my opinion, good. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
At first I was distracted by the premise, which seemed to me ludicrous* and the sheer bulk of the rom-com tropes (tropes which yes, this movie basically invented), but before long Gable and Colbert’s chemistry and comic chops brought my walls of Jericho down.
One strange bit: I have nothing against Capra at all but this feels nothing like a Capra and I sort of mean it (though I’m not sure how or why) as a compliment. If you’d shown this to me blind I’d have guessed Sturges.
Read 6 tweets
8 Oct
I hope people aren’t forgetting how remorselessly Pence employs his method of giving that slow sad shake of his head as the damning truth is spoken about him, until it’s his turn, at which point he politely lies his dick off and nobody corrects him.
He is every bit a creature of this media age as Trump, perfectly suited to a world optimized for shameless bullshit.
I’m not saying Harris won’t make better or more substantive points, because of course she will— she’ll be the only one making any.

But modern presidential debates aren’t about that. They’re about creating an event allowing pundits to talk about who bullshitted best.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!