1./ Wakey wakey...gay boys. Did you sleep through the alarm? Did you decline those urgent calls from your lesbian sisters? Now it's YOUR turn to be gaslit as the trans project to destroy the very meaning of the word gay steps up a gear.👇attitude.co.uk/article/mr-gay…
2./ Look, I don't care who sleeps with or fancies any consenting adult. Good luck to them. But was it only me that missed the memo that said gay men can now have periods and...glory in how their "pussy bleeds". Yep, I'm betting you missed that memo too.👇
3./ Before you turn over and go back to sleep maybe just think for a moment....if this person who is biologically female can now say they're a gay man who's just a "hairless small boy pumped with oestrogen" which female couldn't say the same?👇
4./ And hey it's not that there's anything wrong with the female body. BUT if we redefine the category of 'gay man' to mean someone who may be of the female sex our rights under the Equality Act implode since we are no longer only attracted to other people of the "same sex".
5./ Coming soon: if someone discriminates against us couldn't they argue "We just prefer the sort of gay man that's not exclusively into male bodies. We prefer gay men who like breasts and female genitals". Maybe schools advice will have to be updated too.
6./ How much more inspiring will it be for teenage boys who think they may be gay to be told that some gay men are born with vaginas. "If you're a gay boy and are starting to menstruate, ask your teacher for advice". Talk about full circle. We've gone from Section 28 to 1928.
7./ Don't you think countries like Russia, Uganda or Poland will now have another means to oppress us? The next time someone criticises Iran's disgusting policy of castrating gay men couldn't Khameini respond, "It's well known in the UK gay men are often born with vaginas".
8./ Iran is a centre for "sex change surgery". In a country that executes gay men many have no option but to take oestrogen and have a surgically constructed vagina created. They've no choice but to have their gayness redefined out of existence. We do. economist.com/middle-east-an…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1./ 🧵My latest article celebrates the political wisdom of Ann Widdecombe. Tributes have tended to focus on her defence of free speech, loyalty to friends and great good humour. Yet when it came to the likes of the Gender Recognition Act her views were also uncannily prescient.
2./ During the debate in 2004 Widdecombe described the GRA as a legal quagmire and slammed legislators for failing to "examine the impact on others and on society". How much confusion and sacrifice of women's safety could have been avoided had we heeded her warnings.
3./ Widdecombe ridiculed the idea someone might get a new birth certificate with their false sex. “It is nonsense to try to throw a veil of secrecy...over the past, suggesting ...one can rewrite it or wipe it out,” she told the GRA's hapless proposer David Lammy. Yes him again!
1./ 🧵@PeterTatchell's awful comments on Ann Widdecombe's death have shocked many in the mainstream media. Why though do they turn a blind eye to something just as shocking: his career-long defence of child sexual abuse? Let me tell you why Tatchell should be a pariah. 👉
1/of 19
2./ Is there anyone else in public life who has openly defended men raping boys as Tatchell did in a letter to the Guardian in 1997? It ended with this clarion call: "it is time society acknowledged that not all sex with children is unwanted, abusive and harmful." Nah mate.
3./ In his letter Tatchell cited the views of Gilbert Herdt, an anthropologist who studied tribes in Papua New Guinea. Tatchell failed to acknowledge Herdt had also offered advice to paedophile activists in a pro-paedo magazine on how to normalise their abusive sexual perversion.
1./ 🧵How much did Nicola Sturgeon know about her husband's embezzlement? She claims Peter Murrell's crimes were beyond her wildest imagination. Yet the plot of a book he bought her for Valentine's Day has some startling similarities to the scandal that brought her down. 👉
2./ In my latest article I contrast Sturgeon's portrayal of herself as some sort of innocent abroad to the reality. She has had a lifelong fascination with crime dating back to her childhood obsession with the TV series 'Crown Court'. What an episode her trial would make!
3./ Sturgeon insists she could never have suspected Murrell's crimes yet she is a self-professed "massive fan of crime fiction" who is so knowledgeable about the genre she regularly speaks at crime writing festivals. In 2016 her husband Peter gave her a crime novel she adored. 👉
1./ 🧵Neil Mackay -the Glasgow journalist time forgot- has a new antisemitic conspiracy that's getting him semi-hard. An Israeli firm targetted Scottish elections ...apparently. Mackay who hasn't had an original idea since 1998 is excited. Problem is...👉 heraldscotland.com/politics/viewp…
2./ Forget the idiocy of imagining anyone more than 200 miles from Carnoustie cares what John Swinney does. What is it Mackay suspects Israeli interference wanted to achieve? Ruin Holyrood by ensuring lunatics got elected? This isn't Mackay's first antisemitic rodeo.👉
3./ Who can forget the thoroughly bonkers conspiracy theory about 9/11 Mackay chose to amplify in 2003? It claimed Mossad knew about the plot to hit the Twin Towers yet failed to alert the Americans. The “evidence” this gasbag relied on? Wait till you hear what it was. 👉
1./ 🧵 My latest article is illustrated with an image of a cross-dressing Darth Vader. The reason is that after a series of legal triumphs by a rebel alliance of feminists, Christians, free speech defenders and gender critical gays the Trans Empire is about to strike back. 👉
2./ Already, the lobby's fingerprints are all over the EHRC's Draft Code. It's no accident the EHRC Chair fails to use the word 'women' in this video. She also claims the Code was 'updated after changes in the law'. Not true. The law was merely clarified.
3./ As if that isn't bad enough just 48 hours before the Code was published the UK govt announced it will give a whopping £21M to the LGBTQ+ lobby over the next 3 years. A bribe to Stonewall etc to compensate for the parts of the EHRC Code they couldn't undermine? 🤔
1./ My latest article explores the truth behind an incredible scandal. 3 days ago the UK government announced it will host a huge jamboree for the LGBTQ+ lobby next year. As if that's not bad enough it will also hand over £21M to insane LGBTQ+ organisations. What's going on? 👉
2./ I argue this £21M is the price Labour is willing to pay to keep the LGBTQ+ lobby onside. In 2022 I reported on how the lobby similarly tried to screw the British taxpayer out of £10M as part of a crazy 'Safe to Be Me' conference. Luckily for us the conference collapsed.👉
3./ The lobby had to boycot the Conference when @KemiBadenoch refused to sign off a
Conversion Therapy ban designed to prevent gender nonconforming kids getting therapy. I revealed the 'Safe To Be Me' grift was organised by prominent Tory gays. Who's behind this latest heist? 👉