Any Democrat who uses the term “court packing” to describe expanding the number of seats on the Supreme Court should be smacked upside the head. This is not only idiotic politics. More importantly it is wrong, incorrect, not what anyone is proposing.
2/ For the last decade Republicans have used an escalating mix of aggressive and corrupt means to stack the federal judiciary in order to entrench power they believe they will no longer be able to win in majority elections. If Democrats control the Congress and the White House...
3/ they must take steps to undo this harm and corruption and the most viable, logical path is to add additional seats to the Supreme Court. This is no more than undoing bad acting by Republicans, a remedial, reactive action to ensure that democratic government can function.
4/ If Democrats are pressed on whether they support expanding the Court, the obvious answer is its up to the GOP! The rushed confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett is the culmination of this effort to stack the judiciary via corrupt means. If Republicans give Democrats no ...
5/ choice the consequences are on them. Will Democrats expand the Court? The substantive answer should be, absolutely. The political answer is, we’ll have to see what Republicans do. If they continue to abuse their power we’ll have no choice.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Josh Marshall

Josh Marshall Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @joshtpm

7 Oct
I'll return to this point. It's very possible Trump was infected at the Saturday/SCOTUS event. But we can't ignore that he spent two days with someone who was COVID positive at the end of the previous week. As far as I know there's no reporting about another person at the ...
2/ event who seems likely to have contracted the disease by another means prior to the Saturday event. Someone (at least one person) had to arrive there with COVID to explain the spreader event. Trump is the only one we know of with such a backstory.
3/ Now, there were a lot of people there. In the nature of things we're going to know more about Trump's activities and contacts than anyone else. So this is far from definitive. But there's more than a little circumstantial evidence that it was Trump and Hicks who ...
Read 4 tweets
6 Oct
I tend to think in terms of analogues to movies, tv shows, novels to understand the present. There’s something about Trump right now - it’s an analogue to something but I can’t quite place it. Vaguely tragic, mostly ridiculous, but above all just stupid. A sick old man ...
2/ possibly about to get very sick, doing some great dictator antics while obviously struggling to breath. Seemingly in the midst of a manic episode brought on by medication, helped forward by his army of cronies and toadies and sycophants. What movie is it?
3/ For idiosyncratic reasons it is reminiscent to me of some themes in Blake Edwards SOB. But I can’t think past the squalid, terrified, soul dying image of an obviously ill man recording videos claiming he hasn’t felt better in decades. Is it the emperor has no clothes?
Read 4 tweets
4 Oct
In other news I think I just used the Pythagorean Theorem for the first time in my adult life to solve a real world problem. Appreciate the congrats.
Image
I do a lot of hand tool woodworking. Or I did until a couple years ago and then I recently got a chance to set up a new workshop so this is a caddy for bench dogs like these and other wooden jigs. Image
Read 6 tweets
4 Oct
A variety circumstantial evidence suggests the real possibility that President Trump was the superspreader at the Barrett announcement event. He travelled last Thursday and Friday with RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel. But "earlier this week" she was experiencing COVID symptoms.
2/ That makes likely she was already infected when she traveled with the President and possibly infectious. To the best of my knowledge this is the only example of a line into the White House cluster. Of course, it's quite possible there are others. But the timelines would ...
3/ line up quite well with a McDaniel to Trump to GOP VIPSs scenario. Of course others in the Presidential entourage also were on that trip. It could be one of them. Or it cld be a number of people who got it from McDaniel and then attended the Saturday event.
Read 4 tweets
3 Oct
Seeing people pointing out that Kellyanne was talking to this or that person at what looks like the spread event on Saturday. Folks are missing the logic here. It looks like she and other likely **contracted** covid there. If that’s true, she’s not contagious.
2/ Covid is just making first contact with her body at that point. There’s likely one or two people there who gave it to everybody. We might not ever know what that was. Now this of course assuming that the Barrett nomination event is the spreader event and we don’t know that.
3/ But there’s growing circumstantial evidence that it was. And that’s how to think about it if that’s the case. Other point. We have a lot of evidence that covid doesn’t spread well outdoors. There were receptions inside the White House tied to event. We’ve seen a few ...
Read 5 tweets
2 Oct
This is that situation where the White House's total lack of credibility, especially about health matters comes back to haunt not only the White House but the whole country. I don't know the details. But it doesn't seem implausible to me that ... talkingpointsmemo.com/live-blog/trum… via @TPM
2/ you'd want to relocate the President to Walter Reed even if his case remains mild. His obese and in his 70s. A whole apparatus of the executive branch is focused on preserving the life and health of the President. Why not have every possible contingency at the ready?
3/ But is it worse? Maybe much worse? We truly have no idea. The White House has zero credibility and even the President's military doctors have no credibility. It's a bad situation not just in terms of the President's health but in terms of the uncertainty it creates for ...
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!