Meet @OpenClasp

Open Clasp are a women's theatre group based in the north of England.

From their website: "Our aim is to Change the World, One Play at a Time by placing theatre at the heart of transforming the lives of disadvantage (sic) women* and girls.*"

[our asterisks]
"We make truthful, risk-taking and award-winning theatre informed by the lived experiences of women* disenfranchised in theatre and society, those from minority communities and women* affected by the criminal justice system."
"Our women*-centred practice collaborates..." cont.d
"... with women* to draw out their collective voices and shine a light on their experiences.

We create powerful professional theatre and perform to wide-ranging audiences. We encourage our audiences to walk in the shoes of the women* and make space for debate." [hollow laugh]
They work with Durham Constabulary (why are we not surprised) and say this, also on their website:
Open Clasp's logo even features the Venus symbol, for females. Look!
*Can you see where we're going with this...?

A member of Open Clasp received an email from them this week, inviting them to a women only event, with the sender's pronouns proudly declared to be she/her.
Our correspondent asked whether this meant they bought into gender ideology and in fact the woman-centred theatre group misrepresented transwomen as women.

She added, for reasons of personal safety and peace of mind, she did not want to attend if there were males present.
Yes, she was told by @OpenClasp, TWAW and they were sorry to hear that this meant our correspondent might not be inclined to continue engaging with them.
Also startling was Open Clasp's parting shot:

"We fight for and with those who experience discrimination including racism, disableism, poverty, transphobia, transmisogyny and homophobia"

Just not plain old misogyny - that's so passé.
So here we have a women's charity pretending males are women, gaslighting women into knocking down their boundaries whilst working with vulnerable women, purporting to understand domestic abuse, coercive control & attempting to help women affected by the criminal justice system,
often there because of exposure to male violence in the first place.

We're so fed up @OpenClasp

We want to support women's charities. We want to help you.

We just wish you wanted to help women.
It would be great if @OpenClasp could acknowledge that including everyone will naturally exclude some of the vulnerable women and girls you were set up to help, who most need to be there.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with WeAreFairCop

WeAreFairCop Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WeAreFairCop

9 Oct
We have been asked to clarify what the process of judicial review is and what the consequences are.

First - there is a basic distinction between civil and criminal law. A ‘trial’ usually means a criminal case. If it’s civil we say ‘hearing’.
Criminal cases are almost always bought by the State against an individual. Private prosecutions are very, very rare. The standard of proof is very high as conviction can lead to loss of liberty.

Judicial review is a civil remedy.
It’s a mechanism to get the courts to decide if a ‘public body’ has acted lawfully. It doesn’t look at the merits of the decision or failure to act but it questions the decision making process. Was it rational? Was it reasonable?
Read 13 tweets
8 Oct
This is really troubling. It shows just how the rule of law is being attacked by those who wish to prop up an ideology which finds no support in law or fact.

This is a clear allegation of judicial corruption.
We are not entirely sure WHY Mermaids and Stonewall’s efforts to intervene were rejected. One possibility is that they simply left it too late and missed the deadline. Which is interesting if true.
Because it raises the suspicion that this was done deliberately - knowing their arguments could not sustain even a few moments scrutiny, they can now push a narrative that they have been unfairly shut out.
Read 5 tweets
3 Oct
This is what you helped do @Humberbeat You turned ‘Jenni Murray’ from a Dame into a pejorative. Great job @CCLeeFreeman and see you in court @CollegeofPolice
The mere mention of the name Jenni Murray is classed by @Humberbeat as ‘hate designed to cause distress to the trans community...’ and may result in a Hate Incident.
When we asked @HumbersidePCC (Keith Hunter) to intervene, he laughed, mocked and blocked, describing the upset as fun.
Read 6 tweets
2 Oct
What other legislation do we intend to "exceed"?

Laws are worded (usually very explicitly) for a very good reason.
It is unacceptable to shoehorn in an extra term to the *guidance* of a law when the legislation itself doesn't say that thing.

Why are organisations proudly breaking the law?

Labour said they were "ahead of the law".
Police cannot *exceed* speeding or drink driving laws, to below the limits.

We cannot pretend their is a tenth protected characteristics of, say, Ginger.

Imagine if we could just change the law to suit our own goals.

Ridiculous.
Read 4 tweets
23 Sep
Law Commission now recommend ‘hate crimes’ extend to protect women.

First, we must see your definition of ‘woman’.

bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-po… Image
Because if you won’t define ‘woman’ or repeat the mantra ‘TWAW’ then what we are going to see is more women reported to the police for ‘hate’ for stating that their sex is real.
The laws dealing with harassment and abuse need urgent reform - they all predate the rise of the internet. We need creative thinking about how to investigate these offences - why not more use of civilian investigation teams?
Read 9 tweets
9 Sep
A 13 year old GIRL has gone missing. Your report states you are looking for a boy. You cannot and must not recklessly pander to gender identity when a young life is at stake.
This is what happens when you believe @stonewalluk nonsense. Get out there and LOOK FOR A GIRL. Someone who, when they are not posing, looks like a girl. Telling people to look for a boy is idiotic, you damned fools.
We know this because someone trusts us to do the job more than they trust you and they have contacted us to warn of your ideological idiocy. Good grief. We’re speechless.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!