Ed Conway Profile picture
Oct 13, 2020 18 tweets 8 min read Read on X
Thread: Throughout the pandemic there's been plenty of attention focused on #COVID19 deaths and on what’s happened in hospitals and in care homes - for obvious and understandable reasons. But for months there’s been another phenomenon which I find deeply unsettling.
Even after lockdown ended the number of people dying at home has stayed far, far above historic levels. There have been 28k excess deaths in people’s homes - more than in hospitals, care homes or other settings. Only a fraction of these deaths are officially put down to #COVID19. Image
I’ve been banging on about this since early on in the pandemic. It's not a new phenomenon. But it remains stubbornly unchanged even months on, even as excess deaths in other settings - care homes and hospitals - have dropped into normal or negative levels.
Is this something to worry about? Or is it (kind of) good news - in that lots of people would rather die at home than in a medical setting. Frustratingly there’s been v little research on this, so over the past few weeks we’ve been working on a short film looking beneath the data
It starts with Charlotte. Her mum, Caroline, died of ovarian cancer this summer. She had been in hospital but because of lockdown her family hadn’t been allowed to visit her, so they brought her home to try to care for her there. It was an ordeal, but they had little choice. Image
The family couldn’t get as much palliative care as they needed. Their home became a hospital. If she had gone into a hospice (as she might in normal times) they might not have been able to be with her, so she died with them at home. Her death is one of the thousands in this chart Image
Indeed, the most compelling theory about why excess deaths are up at home and down elsewhere is that these deaths are simply being displaced from other settings.
But these data can’t tell you anything about the QUALITY of death - something which matters enormously.
For many families the answer is remote hospice care (80% of hospice work is done in people’s homes).
Problem is those services have been overwhelmed during the pandemic. And like many, in the early days they struggled to get the PPE that would allow them to do their jobs
Selina says: “We can lose four patients just in one day. We can go off shift and have our two days off, come back to work and all our patients have changed because they’ve died. We’re getting our referrals in later and people are dying a lot sooner.” Image
And even as deaths at home remain so high, the hospice sector are struggling to keep up with the demand.
We’ve been shown numbers from an internal Hospice UK survey: 44% of hospices think they'll have to REDUCE their services. 93% fear people may miss out on the support they need Image
But there’s another likely explanation for high excess deaths at home:
some people are dying earlier than they would have because they've been unable or unwilling to go into hospital for the medical treatment they need. We know these cases are happening anecdotally.
Meet Amanda & Adrian. Adrian has stage 4 bowel cancer. He responded well to chemo - so well that his docs scheduled a life-saving operation to remove a large part of his liver. It was due in April. Then came lockdown, then the op was cancelled. Adrian’s cancer is now terminal Image
Adrian is one of potentially thousands of cancer patients whose care has been affected by lockdown. Doctors expect a surge in cancer deaths in the coming months and years. It is another dimension of what is happening beneath the surface of the data
We're still in the early stages of understanding this. Next week @ONS will produce further data breaking down home deaths by cause to see if there are any early patterns. But @d_spiegel told me it’s not impossible this is a permanent - or at least a long-lasting - change.
If you have time, do check out my long read on a disquieting phenomenon. For months I've been worried about the data showing thousands of excess deaths at home. This is my attempt to get beneath these numbers and understand what's going on news.sky.com/story/coronavi…
Here's our @SkyNews report about excess deaths at home, produced by the brilliant @maddylratcliffe.
As #COVID19 surges again and parts of the country go into another lockdown, this troubling phenomenon is likely to be with us for a while longer
Interesting @ONS deep dive into deaths at home.
Underlines point in my @SkyNews piece on this 👆, some of these deaths would have happened anyway.
Some may be happening sooner because of inability to access healthcare.
Eg see increases in causes of death:
ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati… Image
As of the latest data there have been more excess deaths happening in people’s homes this yr than any other place. Vast majority of the deaths were not from #COVID19.
This is one of the most important but least discussed phenomena of the pandemic.
More on it in the thread 👆 Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ed Conway

Ed Conway Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EdConwaySky

Jan 17
🧵THE STRANGE CASE OF THE ONE MILLION POUND FINE
The story of an obscure press release on an obscure website which begs intriguing questions about Britain's "unprecedentedly tough" sanctions regime & why perhaps it's not quite as tough as it looks.
You may find it unsettling
👇
Back in Aug 2023, HMRC published this notice in the bowels of its website. Don't worry if it doesn't ring a bell - it didn't get any publicity.
But it's a big deal. A £1m fine for breaking Russian sanctions rules.
The single biggest fine in relation to trade sanctions. Image
But there are some gaping questions about this fine.
First: who paid it? Is this a firm we've heard of? Second: what did they actually do wrong? And what did they do to deserve to pay such a large sum?
There are no answers on the website. That's it. Here's why this matters. Image
Read 17 tweets
Jan 10
🇨🇳I was rather hoping to be writing this from China, where the Chancellor has just landed for the most significant economic mission in ages - restarting Britain's formal economic relationship with China.
Alas I'm still in London.
But make no mistake; this visit is a BIG deal.
🧵
Why?
Because this is the first such trip since 2017.
UK econ relations with China have been getting frostier for 6 yrs or more.
Huawei have been thrown out; rules imposed on Chinese businesspeople; accusations of spying.
& around the world nations are imposing tariffs on China.
But the UK is doing something different.
While nearly every other G7 nation has imposed tariffs on Chinese electric cars, the UK hasn't. While most countries are going colder on China (most notably the US), the UK is now cosying up to China. Why?
Read 19 tweets
Jan 7
🔥GAS PRICES🔥
Why are they on the rise again?
Why is Europe (and the UK) deindustrialising at a rapid pace?
Why have we failed (contrary to the conventional wisdom) to increase the amount of non-Russian gas in our system?
Lots of questions. Some answers in my five min primer 👇
This is a big deal - and not widely understood:
The volume of non-Russian gas in the European system is FLAT vs before the Ukraine war.
That's not the conventional wisdom.
Back in 2022 many assumed imported LNG would help make up the lost gas from Russia.
That didn't happen... Image
Instead what happened is subtly, but importantly, different.
Yes, the amount of LNG coming in from the US rose quite sharply - albeit from a low base.
But that rise was only enough to compensate for the fact that domestic production in the UK/EU was FALLING at the same time Image
Read 13 tweets
Jan 5
🌾 VERTICAL FARMING🌾
Could it save the world?
I used to be sceptical. There are MANY challenges.
But then I visited one. & I'm no longer so sure.
So with the world facing future food crises here's a thread on the most interesting thing to happen to farming in a long time...
🧵 Image
Let's start with a chart.
A few weeks ago I did a deep data dive into the state of farming in the UK.
It culminated with a v long-run chart suggesting our ability to grow ever more crops in a given hectare is slowing. Possibly stalling.
This is a really big deal
What if we could send the line in that chart 👇into the stratosphere?
It would have massive consequences. We'd be able to get ever more food from a relatively small section of land. Meaning more land for housing/rewilding or whatever else we'd want to use it for. But how? Image
Read 22 tweets
Dec 30, 2024
If you're interested in energy/climate you've probably heard the nugget that "kerosene/crude oil helped save the whales", by reducing demand for whale oil in lanterns.
I've even trotted it out myself🤦‍♂️
But there's a problem with it. A BIG problem...
🧵
The backstory here begins 200 years ago, before the age of crude oil & electricity, when the best way to light a room was a lantern, and the best oil to burn in that lantern was oil from a sperm whale.
It burnt brighter and with less smoke or stink than other oils Image
The oil itself is found in the head of the sperm whale. It comes from a totally unique organ whose function remains a matter of debate - the spermaceti organ.
Whale oil is a long chain molecule unlike nearly anything else in the natural world, giving it unique qualities Image
Read 15 tweets
Dec 19, 2024
If you're even half interested in energy, I bet you've seen this chart. I call it The Most Hopeful Chart in the World.
The point? We're embracing renewable power MUCH faster than expected.
Hurrah!
Only problem is, this chart has an evil twin. A chart we really need to discuss
🧵 Image
The Most Hopeful Chart in the World shows how each year the @IEA predicted that the amount of solar output around the world would plateau or rise v slowly in the following years. But instead solar output defied all expectations, rising exponentially.
That's great news.
But making solar panels is an energy-intensive exercise.
You need a lot of coal to smelt down the silicon and a lot of power to turn metallurgical silicon into polysilicon, let alone the monocrystalline boules you really need for a decent solar module (read my book for more 📖)
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(