1/ To understand why Social Justice (woke) advocates think the way they do, you need to understand that they have been completely poisoned with cynicism.
This is why they act like they "see right through your bullshit" even when you are being 100% honest.
Let me explain:
2/ When I say poisoned with cynicism, I mean that woke people have adopted a worldview that says that the words and actions of other people are not to be trusted or taken at face value:
3/ This means that the woke view every conversation or discussion with a person who disagrees with them like it is a conversation with a dishonest car salesman, and the goal is to unmask the "real motives" of the other person.
The existence of hidden motives is assumed...
4/ so when you talk to a woke person their goal is not to get clear about what you mean so they can figure out if you're right.
Their goal is to expose the hidden motives, selfish reasoning, and unconscious biases; which they assume you have before the discussion even begins.
5/ as such, the woke approach conversations like they see right through whatever is said to them. The woke think they see everyone else's hidden motives and what others are "really up to," and they see themselves as wise to the power games they think everyone else is playing.
6/ Further, the woke think they can see the way everyone else has been "duped by the system" into believing things that are not true without knowing it, and how other people are just believing things because they have been brainwashed by society to believe them.
7/ The result is when a woke person talks to you they are going to go ignore what you are trying to argue and instead try to show people "what's really going on here" in terms of some story about how you are just trying to gain an advantage for yourself...
8/ Here is a perfect example of what I mean:
Reihan Salam (@reihan) begins to give his opinion on a topic, and Eddie Glaude reacts to it by performatively saying "nice move" in a way that insinuates that Reihan was making a totally disingenuous argument to hoodwink everyone.
9/ This is because the woke think they see right through everyone else, and have a sort of paranoid cynicism that makes them think they can see that everyone who disagrees with you does so for dishonest reasons.
Imagine being in a relationship with someone who thinks like that:
10/ Him: "Want to watch a movie?"
Her: "You just want to sleep with me."
Him: "That wasn't what I was suggesting"
Her: "You can't fool me"
Him: "Fine, maybe the guys want to watch the game"
Her: "so now you're ditching me tonight cause I wont sleep with you?"
It's like that...
11/ No matter what the guy says he can't win because she has already decided that everything he is saying is done with hidden motives in mind, or out of some need to control her or make her jealous.
This is how the woke think, and why a functional dialogue with them is so hard.
12/ Because they ASSUME that you are acting on bad intentions, biases you absorbed from the culture, hidden motives, and self-interest before the conversation even starts, it becomes impossible to actually have a real conversation with them.
Imagine thinking this:
13/ Terrific day today!
-Called many people out as racist and sexist to raise awareness
-Walked past a loving family, told myself it's a patriarchy
-Saw a couple, reminded myself they're hetero-normative
-Listened to favorite album, but deleted it upon realizing it was racist
14/ -had a tough time deciding, do I read White Fragility, watch feminist youtube, or read more about antiracism and how I'm supposed to "do the work" even though "the work is never done."
-I feel so glad to have all these activists tell how I'm supposed to think, feel, and act.
15/ -Reminded myself I am woke and I understand society better than all these racist white males
-I went on a date asked my date if he was feminist. He said he wasn't so I educated him. He also said he had to leave early, which I was honestly fine with cause he wasn't a feminist
16/ -accidentally watched a movie with a racist actor in it and now I feel like a total failure, so I went on twitter to confess that I have to do better.
-going to do self care and eat all my favorite snacks. Felt bad about eating poorly, then felt worse for fat shaming myself
17/ This is how you'll start thinking when you become convinced EVERYTHING is about hidden motives and unconscious biases.
You end up thinking everything is "rooted" in some horrible evil and you won't be able to engage with people or ideas on their own terms.
It's poison.
18/ So, keep this in mind when a woke person ignores your evidence or arguments and starts in on your intentions or calling you biased. This is what they do, and you just have to work at getting the conversation back on track, and getting the evidence back on the table.
19/ Don't let woke cynicism get to you.
Stick to your guns and argue in the clear understanding of what your principles are and what you believe.
/fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ on racist resentment against white people and racialist identity politics, complete with the racist stereotyping.
This shows a continuity of thinking over a period of a decade, and there has been no take back, or explanation for the disgustingly racist tweets she made.
3/ Chris said he didn't care if she was fired, the point was to use her posts to force the New Yorker to choose between equal enforcement of bans on hiring racists who make racist content, or to be explicit that racism against Jews and whites is allowed...
The game being played by the "sex is a spectrum" people is to engage in a sleight of hand between the ontological question (what makes this thing what it is), epistemological question (how do we know this thing when we see it), and linguistic question (how do we define the word)
The tactic is to attack the definition by blurring the lines between the primary features that make the object what it is and define its function and the secondary features we use as proxy's for identifying the object when we encounter it "in the wild".
For example, the primary features of a pencil are the fact that it has a graphite tip that can be used to write erasable and that it is sized correctly for handwriting.
The secondary features are that it is yellow (on the shaft) and pink (on the eraser)
1/ Leftist activism uses exactly this dynamic as a strategy. The goal is to create hot-takes that generate enormous outrage (IE: Syndey Sweeney ads are fascist) which bait people into reacting by writing response pieces or by dunking on it
2/ By using the negative engagement and dunking as free advertising, the leftists is able to provoke more outrage.
They repeat this process until people have outrage fatigue, and the hot take no longer provokes strong reactions, and stating the hot-take no longer causes outrage.
3/ Once the hot-take no longer causes outrage, leftists repeat it until people are sick of it and it becomes background noise. At this point the hot-take becomes banal, and people begrudgingly accept that the hot take is now just another part of the landscape of public opinion
If you hang around leftist circles enough you'll hear the "nazi bar" parable, and this explains how they think about everything.
They don't see themselves as part of being a social movement based on highly controversial and hotly disputed ideas...
...Leftists think their moral values, and social views are just uncontroversial expressions of what is morally right, and leftism is just what you get when everyone is "being kind" and "being a good person."
In their heads, they are the regular crowd at the bar.
They see leftism as the natural, normal, and healthy state of affairs that occurs when everyone is "being kind," they don't realize that leftism is a worldview and political ideology that is hotly contested, and that's built on a set of social values that are highly controversial
The claim that it is an undue burder to ask women to put any effort at all into their relationships with men is a load bearing pillar of woke feminism.
This paper claims that asking women to interpret what men say is a form of "hermeneutic labor" which harms women.
The paper argues that hermeneutic labor is the emotionally taxing requirement that women should interpreting what men say and how they feel. It also argues that women act as men's therapists by telling men how they feel, and that women do all the relationship maintenance.
The premise of the paper is that women do all the work of interpreting how both people in the relationship feel, and then expressing that so they can both understand. The author basically says that women have been acting as mens' therapists for centuries.