1/ To understand why Social Justice (woke) advocates think the way they do, you need to understand that they have been completely poisoned with cynicism.
This is why they act like they "see right through your bullshit" even when you are being 100% honest.
Let me explain:
2/ When I say poisoned with cynicism, I mean that woke people have adopted a worldview that says that the words and actions of other people are not to be trusted or taken at face value:
3/ This means that the woke view every conversation or discussion with a person who disagrees with them like it is a conversation with a dishonest car salesman, and the goal is to unmask the "real motives" of the other person.
The existence of hidden motives is assumed...
4/ so when you talk to a woke person their goal is not to get clear about what you mean so they can figure out if you're right.
Their goal is to expose the hidden motives, selfish reasoning, and unconscious biases; which they assume you have before the discussion even begins.
5/ as such, the woke approach conversations like they see right through whatever is said to them. The woke think they see everyone else's hidden motives and what others are "really up to," and they see themselves as wise to the power games they think everyone else is playing.
6/ Further, the woke think they can see the way everyone else has been "duped by the system" into believing things that are not true without knowing it, and how other people are just believing things because they have been brainwashed by society to believe them.
7/ The result is when a woke person talks to you they are going to go ignore what you are trying to argue and instead try to show people "what's really going on here" in terms of some story about how you are just trying to gain an advantage for yourself...
8/ Here is a perfect example of what I mean:
Reihan Salam (@reihan) begins to give his opinion on a topic, and Eddie Glaude reacts to it by performatively saying "nice move" in a way that insinuates that Reihan was making a totally disingenuous argument to hoodwink everyone.
9/ This is because the woke think they see right through everyone else, and have a sort of paranoid cynicism that makes them think they can see that everyone who disagrees with you does so for dishonest reasons.
Imagine being in a relationship with someone who thinks like that:
10/ Him: "Want to watch a movie?"
Her: "You just want to sleep with me."
Him: "That wasn't what I was suggesting"
Her: "You can't fool me"
Him: "Fine, maybe the guys want to watch the game"
Her: "so now you're ditching me tonight cause I wont sleep with you?"
It's like that...
11/ No matter what the guy says he can't win because she has already decided that everything he is saying is done with hidden motives in mind, or out of some need to control her or make her jealous.
This is how the woke think, and why a functional dialogue with them is so hard.
12/ Because they ASSUME that you are acting on bad intentions, biases you absorbed from the culture, hidden motives, and self-interest before the conversation even starts, it becomes impossible to actually have a real conversation with them.
Imagine thinking this:
13/ Terrific day today!
-Called many people out as racist and sexist to raise awareness
-Walked past a loving family, told myself it's a patriarchy
-Saw a couple, reminded myself they're hetero-normative
-Listened to favorite album, but deleted it upon realizing it was racist
14/ -had a tough time deciding, do I read White Fragility, watch feminist youtube, or read more about antiracism and how I'm supposed to "do the work" even though "the work is never done."
-I feel so glad to have all these activists tell how I'm supposed to think, feel, and act.
15/ -Reminded myself I am woke and I understand society better than all these racist white males
-I went on a date asked my date if he was feminist. He said he wasn't so I educated him. He also said he had to leave early, which I was honestly fine with cause he wasn't a feminist
16/ -accidentally watched a movie with a racist actor in it and now I feel like a total failure, so I went on twitter to confess that I have to do better.
-going to do self care and eat all my favorite snacks. Felt bad about eating poorly, then felt worse for fat shaming myself
17/ This is how you'll start thinking when you become convinced EVERYTHING is about hidden motives and unconscious biases.
You end up thinking everything is "rooted" in some horrible evil and you won't be able to engage with people or ideas on their own terms.
It's poison.
18/ So, keep this in mind when a woke person ignores your evidence or arguments and starts in on your intentions or calling you biased. This is what they do, and you just have to work at getting the conversation back on track, and getting the evidence back on the table.
19/ Don't let woke cynicism get to you.
Stick to your guns and argue in the clear understanding of what your principles are and what you believe.
/fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Any leftist podcaster or celebrity can hold an event at any University in the United States with minimal security and be completely safe.
Conservative speakers can't hold events on campus without armed guards and a bullet proof vest.
Let's talk about why🧵
Universities have basically said there is no penalty for *trying* to do violence against conservatives; there's only a penalty if you actually manage to injure one of them.
You can try to do violence as much as you like, and there's no penalty until you actually hurt somone.
It's like telling a man with a loaded gun "shoot as many bullets at people as you like — we won't stop you until you actually hit someone."
This is the logic universities use when responding to the threats, protests, and riots the left uses to intimidate and shut down speakers.
1. There is no such legal category as "hate speech" 2. You don't defeat ideas by banning them 3. Adopting a leftist frame ("hate speech" is leftist framing) is always a losing proposition.
The entire literature on hate speech was created by leftists, and is embedded with leftist assumptions. There is no way to appropriate that body of work without rehabilitating and legitimizing leftist arguments against free speech and in favor of censorship.
The reason the trans-movement is so nihilistic, violent, and unhinged is because it is postmodern, and the postmodern intellectual solvent it uses to dissolve the distinction between male and female also dissolves the distinction between good and evil.
The postmodern ideology of the transgender activists believes all values of any kind (moral, social, scientific, and epistemic) are just social constructs that have been constructed in alignment with the interests of the dominant ideology or ruling class.
so...
On this view the legitimacy of a given set of values is not a matter of fact, it depends on the interests of the people evaluating those values. As such the values of a society are a determined by which group has the power to embed it's interests in the social value structure...
People who celebrate the murder of their political opponents are not participating in the marketplace of ideas, they are encouraging deadly political violence by building a permission structure to legitimize and justify the murder of those they disagree with.
My freedom of speech means I get to clearly and succintly explain to the whole world that if you call for the assassination of your rivals this is not free speech, it is a direct incitement to political violence.
John Stewart Mill gave a famous example where he said that if someone claims corn dealers are starvering the poor this can be allowed if circulated through the press, but is not allowed when shouted in front of an excited mob assembled outside the house of a corn dealer....
1/ The Radical Left has used political violence to advance their cause for decades. What's new is the progressive left's professional class building a permission structure to justify the use of political violence
It's called Assassination Culture, and we need to talk about it
🧵
2/ To understand what's happening, you need to understand that the line between progressive-left professional class and radical left has been blurred. The extremist radical left and the socially progressive "bluesky left" are increasingly intertwined both socially and politically
3/ This is because many of the extremist radical from the 60's and 70' who advocated for, and participated in, the use of political violence have been welcomed into the mainstream institutions that are run by the progressive left professional class.
Look at the number of pro-athletes posting condolences about Charlie Kirk, and you'll see what a huge cultural figure he was.
He wasn't just famous in conservative circles, his clips debating college students were a loadbearing pillar of online political pop-culture
His willingness to calmly and politely debate all comers on any issue (at the very moment when cancel culture was strongest and people were afraid to say what they think) made him a sort of lovable internet folkhero.
He was an indelible piece of the online landscape.
Charlie was not quarantined to the "conservative ghetto" of online content; he broke contain and became a mainstream cultural figure.
Charlie became the cultural symbol of free debate, free speech, and settling differences in public with words