Barrett's face when Booker asks if she's against white supremacy. 
Barrett refuses to get into what Trump has or hasn't said, but gives an eloquent defense of the vital importance of a peaceful transfer of power in the American system - pointedly including the acceptance of defeats.
Unsurprisingly, Barrett won't wade into the (long-disputed, never resolved) legal question of what would happen if a president tried to pardon himself.
Booker asks her to criticize Trump for saying the Justices should do the right thing.
Suffering fools gladly gets progressively harder as the afternoon wears on, but she's doing her best.
Booker is trying to play a skip-a-step thing on racial disparities where he's asking Barrett if she's heard of a study and thus agrees that the study's findings are true, or if she denies that such a study exists.
Actually, studies show many things; sometimes they go both ways.
Actually, studies show many things; sometimes they go both ways.
Barrett now patiently explaining to Booker that he's missing the crucial facts of the case he's asking about.
When the law students didn't do all the reading and you're the one who wrote it
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
