I'm just going to call attention to this again, because it's really bizarre. In May, I sent out a series of newsletters, deploring our hysterical culture, titled "The Years of Living Hysterically." claireberlinski.substack.com/p/the-years-of…
Gingrich subscribes to my newsletter. In May, I was pleasantly surprised—if puzzled—to see a recent surge in subscribers. Then I saw why. Newt Gingrich had recommended my newsletter on Fox News.
I was dismayed, however, when I read the column, as I explained: claireberlinski.substack.com/p/welcome-frie…. I was discussing hysteria in the context of the Me Too movement. He felt the notion of the "hysterical culture" explained what--at the time--he thought a hysterical overreaction to Covid-19.
The column has since vanished without a trace from Fox, but it's been archived, here: Wait a bit to let it load. web.archive.org/web/2020092916…
He *specifically denounced* not only the projection that 2.2 million Americans could die in the pandemic but the modelers themselves.
He described the influence of these "supposedly expert modelers" as a "great scandal" requiring "congressional hearings into their destructive impact." He claimed the modelers "completely misinformed government leaders, the news media and ultimately the public."
I replied, at some length, that this was nuts.
I can't quite remember what transpired after that, but I believe he wrote to me to express disappointment that I'd failed to understand his argument. I didn't think about it again.

But today, the earlier column having gone down the memory hole--
he's published an article arguing that Trump saved two million lives from Covid-19. He writes: "Biden and Harris—and their media allies—are completely ignoring that the early estimates from our country's top epidemiologists" ... well, read for yourself:
This is astonishing. He's gone from denouncing these epidemiologists as "supposed experts," panic-mongering frauds, and quacks--who should be grilled by Congress for fomenting panic--to using their estimates as the gravamen of his argument that Trump saved 2.2 million lives.
And the original article has disappeared. No correction, no explanation: It's just not there anymore. When the NYT changes the text introducing the 1619 project without explanation, it is, rightly, pilloried for its bad faith.
But this is something way beyond the NYT's efforts to tone down the more fantastic claims in the article. This is a prominent public figure making *exactly the opposite* claim he made just a few months ago, as if he'd never made it.
I remember it extremely well, of course, because he mentioned me in that article. If he'd written, "I've since changed my mind about this, owing to Claire Berlinski's arguments," well--great. But that's not what happened.
It's a level of political cynicism and journalistic impropriety that really takes me aback. And I don't understand it, frankly. Why would he squander his credibility and reputation to defend Trump? Trump, assuredly, wouldn't do it for him.
Wouldn't you imagine he'd be trying now to swim away from the sinking ship as fast as possible? Why run interference for a President who is *rightly* headed for defeat after the deaths of 215,000 Americans, with many more to come?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Claire Berlinski.

Claire Berlinski. Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ClaireBerlinski

13 Oct
Presumably like most people who read this article, I finished it and then immediately went off to read Snows of Kilimanjaro, trying to understand it as McCain did. Like @MarkSalter55, I remembered it as a story of heartbreaking regret.
Upon re-reading it, I discovered that it is indeed a story of heartbreaking regret. There's no other way to read it.

If you read it in middle-age, during a pandemic, from the bedroom where you've sat for months--
--months that increasingly seem like years, stale, flat, weary and unprofitable, slowly reviewing, in your mind, the ambitions of your youth, your memories of Paris and Istanbul when you were younger--
Read 4 tweets
10 Oct
Here are some questions I have about a post-Trump world.
1. I would describe the Trump presidency as a national trauma. The trauma has involved *humiliating loss,* one of the most potent and destructive of human emotions--
--and an emotion, many have observed, that often gives rise to deep clinical depression.

Among those who didn't support him, Trump has attacked our narcissistic pride. Our pride in being Americans; in believing Americans were immune to low-rent, third-world demagoguery;
our pride in believing ourselves, deep down, to be *serious* and *responsible* people; our pride in our system of governance--which wasn't supposed to create results like a Trump Presidency.
Read 11 tweets
9 Oct
More from the indictment, which is horrifying. They came to the attention of the Feds because one of them became uneasy about the plan to kill cops.
They met at a "Second Amendment rally." They planned to "storm the Capitol building" and take hostages.
June 25: They call Whitmer a "this tyrant bitch" because gyms are closed. Recall Trump's Tweets:
Read 13 tweets
9 Oct
Trump has always sounded like this. Remember the crazy conspiracy theories about Obama and calling Hillary "the Devil?" Those weren't signs of desperation, that's his personality. (That's why it's called a personality disorder.)
Yes, it's getting worse--but that's age and stress, and possibly illness. It's not some kind of marked change, not at all. If this didn't bother voters last time around, it probably won't bother them this time around.
What *will* bother them, though, is having lived through four years of a personality-disordered president--and seeing for themselves that this hasn't in the least made America great again--but rather diseased, poor, chaotic, and nearly as nuts as he is.
Read 5 tweets
8 Oct

This is critical. I was once a skeptic about the value of soft power, but I am a skeptic no more. Only if we get our own house in order will we prevail.
Our current inability to govern ourselves, our violence, inability to control disease--Covid19, but also all manner of epidemic disease from addiction to suicide to obesity--and our inability to cooperate to achieve great, or even reasonably good things,
has darkened the prestige of our political model, internationally. If our system fails, visibly, to promote human well-being and flourishing, Socialism with Chinese Characteristics will sound better and better--and not just in China. It is a true contest of ideas.
Read 4 tweets
7 Oct
So this is where, @TommyAmenta, I see support for my hypothesis that this isn't political anymore; it's not precisely a religion, but it has more in common with a religion than a political movement as we usually conceive of it. The fundamental thesis of the Trump Presidency--
"I will keep you safe from bad, dangerous, impure foreign things"--has been about as comprehensively repudiated as it could be. Yet it doesn't matter. That "support for the President" number stays stable--42 percent--no matter what happens, no matter what's revealed,
no matter how much personal suffering people are experiencing because the President is bad at his job, no matter how clear it is that nothing he says is true and nothing he does has made America better in any way.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!