I appreciate that the Republicans are now trying to emphasize that filling vacancies does not equal "court packing" - but they were not always so careful with words. Back in 2013, this is precisely what some accused President Obama of doing when he filled 3 DC Circuit vacancies.
159 CONG. REC. 16,594 (2013) (statement of @JohnCornyn) (“I think the evidence is overwhelming that what the President is trying to do by nominating these unneeded judges to [the D.C. Circuit], the second most powerful court in the Nation, is he is trying to pack the court...").
@LindseyGrahamSC also referred to filling the D.C. Circuit seats as "court packing," later saying that he told Harry Reid and President Obama that "the consequence of changing the rules in the Senate to pack the court will come back to haunt them.” perma.cc/6REN-PYQL%5D
@TomCottonAR went so far as to introduce the "Stop Court-Packing Act" (H.R. 2239, 113th Cong. (2013)), which, almost ironically, was meant to unpack the D.C. Circuit by reducing the court to 8 judges - to prevent President Obama from filling the vacancies.
They are right to say that words matter. But it also matters that they tried to use those same words in the past for their own political gain.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Do you remember when Juliet asks aloud, "What's in a name?" Clearly she was talking about the DC Circuit's many stylings over the years... (mini ⚖️🧵, 1/x)
In 1801 we see the creation of the Circuit Court for the District of Columbia, thanks to the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1801. (Since we are talking about names, I have to confess that I love the name of that Act.) (2/x)
Now quick frolic – (I promise it will be fun) – the first three judges appointed to that court were Thomas Johnson (who refused to serve – the nerve!), James Marshall (brother of everyone’s favorite Chief Justice) and William Cranch (Supreme Court Reporter extraordinaire)! (3/x)