Here is a lengthy interview of the owner of the Mac shop who turned Hunter Biden’s laptop and it’s contents over to the FBI in Dec 2019 and then to Rudy Giulani’s lawyer in Sept 2020 : thedailybeast.com/man-who-report…
Highlights: Someone who identified himself as Hunter brought in 3 laptops with water damage in April 2019. One was a total loss and the shop owner, who is legally blind, gave it back. A second one needed only a keyboard replacement, which was done and that laptop was given back
The third laptop was kept to download as many files as could be retrieved onto an external hard drive. He found “millions” of files on the desk top, and he manually dragged each from the damaged computer to a the external hard drive. The customer never came back to pick it up
... or pay the bill. Based on the contents of the files, including embarrassing photos ( but no child porn), the shop owner became concerned over his personal safety. During the impeachment hearings, through a friend he reached out to the FBI. Two agents from the Wilmington
... office or Baltimore showed up in Dec with a subpoena. In follow up calls the agents sought help in accessing the files. As for his fear for his safety, he said he was afraid of someone connected to the Biden’s might have motive to do him in. He must have raised this fear with
... the agents, as one told him people who don’t talk can expect to not be harmed. They told him if someone came back to pick up the laptop, stall for a day and text the agents, and they will bring back the original laptop and hard drive so the owner could give it to Hunter the
... next day. After nothing happened over the coming months, the shop owner continued to feel fearful about his safety, implicitly because he wasn’t certain what the FBI was up to, as he never heard from them. In September his acquaintance put him in touch with Giuliani’s lawyer.
He continued to refuse to answer all other questions about how and why he got in touch with Giuliani, except to say it was related to his fear for his personal safety. He also refused to say what emails he reviewed and how he found them. Bottom line is that his story does not
... support a theory that these files were either hacked or forged. It sounds authentic to me.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kingmaker - Big IF! (True)

Kingmaker - Big IF! (True) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KingMakerFT

21 Sep
@shipwreckedcrew Interesting contrast b/w Mueller’s so-called bulldog, Andrew Weissmann, and Mueller’s chief deputy, Aaron Zebley. One correction though: Gen George Meade led the Army of the Potomac at Gettysburg. Meade, not McClellan, didn’t pursue Lee’s defeated army after the battle was won.
@shipwreckedcrew One major issue that jumps out of this article summarizing Weissmann’s blame game with Zebley: While Weissmann was advocating a tougher, scorched earth strategy with Trump by issuing a grand jury subpoena for his testimony, Weissmann ignores the handshake deal w Trump’s lawyers
@shipwreckedcrew ... Under that deal the president and entire WH staff undertook a massive effort to cooperate w the SCO, producing over 1 million documents and submitting to dozens of interviews without raising executive privilege. Without that deal the investigation would still be going on.
Read 4 tweets
9 Sep
@shipwreckedcrew @shipwreckedcrew does the best job I’ve seen of explaining why it’s not the job- indeed the Constitution prohibits it- for an executive branch employee such as an FBI agent or director, to launch a counterintelligence investigation of a duly elected president to determine whether
@shipwreckedcrew ... he is a threat to national security. If the president commits crimes that threaten national security, it’s Congress’ job to impeach. If what’s at stake is a difference of opinion on how best to keep the country safe, that’s an issue for the voters in elections to decide.
@shipwreckedcrew But employees of the executive branch answer to the president, who is exclusively in charge of determining foreign policy. If employees disagree, talk to the president or someone close to him. If that doesn’t help, quit. Write a book. Become a whistleblower if you believe there
Read 5 tweets
25 Aug
Excellent analysis of the Clinesmith case by @AndrewCMcCarthy - nationalreview.com/2020/08/clines…
... wherein FBI lawyer seizes on ambiguity in CIA correspondence regarding C Page’s status, ignores unambiguous phrase describing what Page actually does (“provides reporting to us”), engages in willful blindness by refraining to 1) look at the underlying memo cited by the CIA
and 2) not following up with CIA to clear up the ambiguity, as they offered to do, to the end that FBI lawyer could adhere to his belief (or hope) that Page wasn’t a source. @AndrewCMcCarthy describes a corrupt lawyer engaging in a dishonest act and covering it up with ...
Read 4 tweets
19 Aug
From a big picture standpoint, and leaving aside the problem I’ve raised about whether all elements of the crime are present, the Clinesmith presents a far larger problem for Durham as it stands today. In effect, accepting the guilty plea on the theory that KC altered the email
but thought what he added was accurate, allows an FBI lawyer to claim mitigation based on semantics. It elevates semantics over substance. Page interfaced with and helped the CIA as they were watching suspected Russian spies. The reality was that Page let himself be used in the
aid of the agency trying to catch the spies, as opposed to being simply the target of recruitment by the Russians- which is how the FBI characterized the facts in the FISA application. Clinesmith knew the difference and understood the question on the table was what, in substance,
Read 5 tweets
18 Aug
Some totally random thoughts after skimming the Senste Intel report: 1) The SSCI didn’t see the actual transcript of Flynn’s 12/29 call w Kislyak. They got the FBI’s summary and the 302. 2) The SSCI developed a lot of evidence of Maria Butina meeting w a variety of politicians.
3) Patrick Byrne introduced Butina to Rand Paul, consistent w his story timeline of the FBI encouraging him to introduce her around. He was rewarded by Butina by suggesting he’d be asked to speak at the World Economic Conference in St Petersburg. 4) The SSCI had no clue about ...
the details of what the PSS told the FBI, including that he lived in the US, not Russia. 5) The FBI spent little effort trying to corroborate the dossier, although the claimed to work on it until May 2017 when the SC was appointed. 6) After the SC was appointed, the SCO took over
Read 6 tweets
11 Aug
I was disturbed yesterday by a report that a commentator at CNN criticised Pres. Trump for considering making his nomination acceptance speech at Gettysburg b/c the battlefield memorializes Confederate war heroes. Has our nation lost its history?
I’ll remind everyone that Gettysburg is not simply a place, nor a just an old battleground that today memorializes thousands of men on both sides of the conflict who lost their lives in the battle. No, Gettysburg is also a short, two or three minute speech, given by Pres. Lincoln
That remarkable address quickly found its way around the world and was read by tens of millions of freedom loving people. It is among the purest expressions of what our nation, and freedom loving nations everywhere, should aspire to.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!