Neil O'Brien Profile picture
Oct 16, 2020 25 tweets 5 min read Read on X
TAKING THE GREAT BARRINGTON DECLARARTION SERIOUSLY – a thread.
1 or 2 MPs have advocated the ideas in the “Great Barrington Declaration”: that we should get back to normal, go for herd immunity, & try to shield the elderly & vulnerable. Rather than dismiss this out of hand I've tried to crunch some numbers on what it would mean in practice.
First, how many people would need to totally isolate as the virus accelerates through the rest of the population?
There were 12,374,440 people aged 65+ in the UK in 2019.

But there are 14,843,119 people who lived in a household with someone aged 65+

Additionally (in England alone) there were 2,240,850 patients on the Shielded List - though some of these over 65, so there's some overlap)
Trying to isolate and supply food to all these 15-16m people while the virus spiked would be a monumental undertaking, & much like a hard (6 month at least) lockdown for a large part of the population. It’s not clear how we’d safely supply them with food as the virus spiked.
Second, how many people would likely die? If we look at English mortality rates from this Nature article and apply them to the UK population, we can get a range of answers.

nature.com/articles/d4158…
Everyone accepts that the isolation of old and ill people couldn't be 100% complete: some will choose not to isolate, some will have to go to hospital or see carers, or live in care homes, or the young people living with them will not fully isolate and they’ll get it.
About 8% of people have had the virus (call it 10% to be generous). Lets say we need to get to 60% for herd immunity. So we’d need a bit over 50% of the younger population to get it (and somehow avoid overshooting, which seems unlikely, but lets assume we could do that for a mo)
Using data from England suggests that if only half of the younger population got it and (miraculously) only 5% of pensioners (because isolation is near complete), that would mean 90,000 deaths. If 10% pensioners get it, that would be 130,000. If 15% then about 175,000.
…That’s a lot of deaths. But that’s still assuming that healthcare is not overwhelmed, and so all those who need treatment for Covid are still getting it. It’s also assuming there are no non-Covid deaths caused by the NHS being overwhelmed. Both assumptions are very unlikely.
Let’s look at data on hospitalisation rates from this paper in the lancet. And apply them to the UK population.

bmj.com/content/369/bm…
If we again assume 50% of younger people get the virus and 5% to 15% of pensioners, that means between 860,000 and around 1.1m hospitalisations. Given the geometric way the virus grows without interventions, they would likely come at roughly the same time in a pronounced spike.
In England there are 4,123 adult critical care beds (up from 3,550 in 2010). Not everyone in hospital would need critical care, but even a small % of hundreds of thousands of people into 4,000 beds doesn’t go. Liverpool is already at 95% capacity.

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8…
So the likely spike in admissions would likely wash over the NHS like a tidal wave over a tiny sandcastle. So we should add to the directly-caused deaths two additional large numbers...
... first, the covid patients who would die because they won’t be able to get treatment, and second, the patients with other diseases who would die because the health service is knocked out. It's likely to add up to hundreds of thousands dead.
There is then a further cost in terms of people who get the disease, don’t die but will have long term health problems. We don’t know how large this would be. The KCL study suggests 60,000 have been seriously ill for over three months. Scale that up and it is a large number.
To go with the GBD, you’d have to be 100% certain than NONE of the three permanent solutions will arrive: no vaccines, no mass rapid testing & no medical improvements such that ppl get the virus but don’t die. It seems pretty likely that several of these will arrive next year.
Vaccines are getting close, and various countries like China have started rolling out experimental vaccines before end of clinical trials...

biopharmadive.com/news/coronavir…

theguardian.com/world/2020/oct…
The US is starting to roll out mass rapid testing:

So good solutions are coming.

Lets look at the track record of the people behind the GBD.
One of the lead authors of the GBD predicted in May: “I think that the epidemic has largely come and is on its way out in this country.” She said the decline in cases was “due to the build-up of immunity.” This prediction proved radically wrong.
This matters because they make the same argument now: that SAGE are wrong because many more people out there are immune to Covid-19. The exact reason they say this will work now, is the same reason they said it was all over and fizzling out in the summer.
As a kicker, because people can get reinfected, it is not even sure we'd ever get to herd immunity, even if you think an elected government could somehow ride this out for the duration.
No countries are currently following the strategy suggested in the Great Barrington Declaration. The countries doing best have followed completely different approaches. Germany has local lockdowns. Japan has massively high mask use. Korea sacrificed privacy for great tracing.
We should learn from them, rather than embark on a route which, I'm sad to say, would definitely see the NHS overwhelmed and would be likely to lead to hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths.

END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Neil O'Brien

Neil O'Brien Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NeilDotObrien

Jan 16
The map below shows the share of child sex convictions where the offender's ethnicity wasn't recorded. The variation is huge.
It shows why Starmer is wrong to block a national inquiry & rely on local officials to investigate themselves.
And it points to a wider issue...🧵(1/6) Image
You might have thought that following 2020 and George Floyd there would be improvements to statistics on criminal justice and ethnicity.

But my new piece finds the reverse is true - we're becoming less and less likely to record the ethnicity of people convicted of crimes. (2/6) Image
Child sex offences are in the news, but they are just one offence type where ethnicity information has become less and less likely to be recorded. (3/6) Image
Read 6 tweets
Jan 6
I have a new piece on the Schools Bill, which will be debated on Wednesday.
It's a truly disastrous Bill which smashes up 30+ years of cross-party progress & reform.
The most frustrating thing is that we can see that the reforms worked: Image
The Bill is an onslaught on the magic formula of freedom plus accountability which has driven improvement.

The effect is abolishing academies in all but name. It's a return to centralisation and micromanagement: Image
The Bill will hit the pay of good teachers, making it harder to keep great people in the profession.

Good trusts are making back office savings to pay good teachers more. But the Bill will abolish their freedom to do that. Image
Read 8 tweets
Oct 28, 2024
My joint article with NHS consultant @drcarolinej looks at how changing migration is taking us away from our target to eliminate HIV in the UK by 2030.
We argue for a new HIV strategy, including making testing a visa requirement for people from high prevalence countries. Image
The sudden reversal in the declining trend since 2005 is driven by people born outside the UK, notably from high prevalance countries, particularly in Africa: Image
The share of new HIV diagnoses to people born outside the UK has gone up across the country over the last two years. But this is particularly true *outside* London. Last year it was 91% in Yorkshire, and 88% in the East Midlands and East of England. Image
Read 15 tweets
Oct 22, 2024
Absolutely disgraceful attempt to smear the police by Runnymede Trust claiming Kaba death was "racist state violence".

As well as refusing to accept the court verdict they produce a TOTALLY misleading statistic - chosen to whip up conflict (1/8) Image
They quote a figure for deaths "following police contact *since 1990* - which makes it sound like the police are killing loads of people. But the IOPC give some examples of what this category really involves: (2/8) Image
Here are categories that are included in it: (3/8) Image
Read 8 tweets
Oct 14, 2024
Today’s Industrial Strategy Green Paper looks pretty similar to the 2017 Industrial Strategy Green Paper & the 2021 Levelling Up White Paper. There's not much new in it.

Thats fine, but it also repeats some Westminster Received Wisdom I think is questionable. Quick 🧵
It claims: “For the eight largest cities outside London combined, the gap between actual and potential productivity could be worth £47 billion.” It includes this chart which you have probably seen before: Image
If we look at the map of average earnings, it is true that several cities have low earnings. But then, so do lots of non-urban areas. And intermediate areas too. It’s not obvious the cities are the only place with an unusual problem. Image
Read 25 tweets
Oct 4, 2024
My previous thread looked at how we got to having the most expensive power in Europe, and why things will get exponentially worse with Ed Miliband's dash foe a zero carbon grid. This thread looks at the impact on industry and the poorer parts of the UK 🧵
Our framework is all about domestic UK emissions (0.77% world emissions) rather than developing the technologies that can solve the global problem. Our high energy costs have just shunted production from the UK to dirtier countries, and we have imported their products.
The “embodied emissions” in the stuff we import account for a bigger share of total energy use than in any other major industrial economy. In 2019 embodied emissions were 25% of the total in the UK, compared to 12% in the US, 11% in Germany and 3% in Japan.
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(