No, I am not—nor will I *ever* be open to/interested in—“agreeing to disagree” with Trump supporters.
Here’s why, and why you shouldn’t either.
(THREAD)
If you still support Donald Trump, you and I do not “have a difference of opinion” or “different political views.”
We are DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED and INEXORABLY INCOMPATIBLE in terms of morality, decency, character, intellect, compassion, integrity, sanity, clarity, and humanity.
Donald Trump is not “a politician I dislike/disagree with.”
He is a(n):
• 34x convicted felon
• Judge-and-jury-adjudicated rapist
• Traitor to America who incited an insurrection
• Puppet of Putin and global autocrats
• Open enemy of LGBTQ rights and democracy itself
It’s not funny at all. You want to know why the victims haven’t come forward? Because MOST OF THEM ARE DEAD/KILLED. You want to know why no police reports/investigations? Because Republican Ohio governor @MikeDeWine INSTRUCTS THE SHERIFFS IN OHIO VALLEY NOT TO FILE/SHRED THEM.
1. Whether you love me or hate me, I am not “some random twitter douche.” I am the most far-reaching political influencer on this platform. And I achieved that by putting out credible content every single day for the past 9 years straight
2. I made a pledge to all who followed me when I first started posting on here in 2017 that I would always engage with them, answer their questions, and NEVER LIE TO THEM. And I have KEPT THAT PLEDGE. I DO NOT SPREAD MISINFORMATION AND DESPISE PEOPLE WHO DO (like everyone you RT)
.@JDVance: It's been 1 week since you sent a "cease and desist" letter to me demanding that I delete the tweet in which I called you out for RAPING BOYS in the Ohio Valley in the mid-2000s (which you did). I told you to GET FUCKED. Where is the "swift and certain legal action"?
.@TheRabbitHole84 is correct that if you type this prompt into @grok, it says “Yes.”
However, it’s incorrect to say that this is the right answer. As a prolific reader and scholar of history, inequality, psychology, sociology, and the origins of social hierarchy, I know this one
Here’s how I led @grok to the right answer:
1. I responded to its wrong answer of “Yes” with:
“That is incorrect”
@grok .@Grok responded:
“I respect your view. My stance is that Affirmative Action can be seen as racist because it involves treating individuals differently based on race, often prioritizing certain groups over others in opportunities like education or employment.”
.@JDVance just had a local constable deliver a “cease and desist” letter about the tweet below from someone named “Chris Ashby,” who interestingly does not appear to even represent the @VP. It threatens to pursue “swift and certain legal action” against me if I don’t delete this.
I will neither be ceasing nor desisting. Nor will I be deleting the tweet. Because nothing in it is false and you cannot win a defamation case against someone who posted a true statement against you. I left a message for Chris at his law firm letting him know to contact me.
I asked @grok: “What would a president of the U.S. who worked for our enemies be doing right now to destroy America while maintaining plausible deniability about his blatant treason?”
Here’s what it said. Stop me if you see any parallels to what @realDonaldTrump is doing
“A president working for enemies while maintaining plausible deniability would likely engage in subtle, strategic actions to undermine the U.S. without overt treason. Here’s what they might do:”
1. **Weaken National Security**:
- Gradually reduce funding or readiness for critical defense programs under the guise of "budget optimization" or "peace initiatives."