HOW WE GOT HERE: PART XI—CONCLUSION: FINDING RECONCILIATION AND TOGETHERNESS
This thread contains excerpts from Part XI of “How We Got Here.” This part concludes the treatise, distilling key points and painting a moral vision for the future.
“One day, when this nightmare is over, we will need a Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission. In the Commission, among other things, we will have to ask ourselves hard questions about the conditions that have allowed extremism to take hold.”
“Already, a pre-autopsy of how Trump took over America highlights crucial issues. Most of all, the greatest danger is not Trump himself. The greatest danger is the wedge that exists within our society.”
“While we might have failed to address the deeper origins of our societal wedge over the past several decades, Trump's election in 2016 should have been a wake-up call.”
“Rather than focusing on universal human rights, we have become more preoccupied with different human identities. Rather than pursuing social justice while building unity and inclusion, we have fallen for a form of justice that drives divisions.”
“Rather than responding to dehumanization with humanization, we have decided to respond with the original insult. And when we dehumanize other people, we otherize them, planting the false belief in our minds that we do not share the same humanity."
“Now, we do not have the power to change our past. But we have the power to change our future. Even at this late moment in our crisis, we still have the opportunity to change course.”
“But if this conflict is to be resolved by force—and there may seem to be no other option in the face of atrocity—we must recognize that, though war may appear to defeat hate, violence is only a form of suppression.”
“As the hate may seem to dissipate and as our society may seem to stabilize for several decades following a war, we risk deceiving ourselves that we have defeated hate. But the roots of this hate will always remain in our soil, ready to resurrect.”
“Anyone who believes we can continue to defeat this ill by outnumbering—or outpowering—the other side is gravely mistaken. Even if we outnumber a group, it will not disappear. Instead, structural fissures will continue to eat away at our society.”
“Thus, until we revolutionize our social structures and address the underlying causes of extremist hate, the stain of hate will persist in our society, and we will never achieve social resilience.”
“Additionally, we must remember that we will all lose in a war—victims and perpetrators alike. No matter how righteous our causes may be, they will mean nothing if we no longer exist.”
“All of these realities also tell us about the central role of reconciliation following any conflict. Without an earnest effort toward reconciliation, the curse of violence will forever tear apart the fabric of our nation.”
“While we must bring the leading criminals to justice, most people will have to engage in the monumental undertaking of reconciliation. This task must be rooted in truth and justice and will be most difficult following the trauma of conflict.”
“It will require all of us to find a form of courage and strength that we never felt existed within us. The choice will be stark: a collective future or a collective death.”
“... we will discover the real power of humanity, and we will watch the awesome sight as freedom and justice flow through all the waters and cover all the lands of the world.”
HOW WE GOT HERE: PART X—THE CURRENT STAGE OF CRISIS
This thread contains excerpts from Part X of “How We Got Here.” This part reflects on the current state of our nation’s crisis, in the context of the treatise’s preceding exposition.
“At present, we have already progressed to a late stage of the crisis that our country faces. Our nation is essentially in a state of tribal warfare, with two competing camps that have entirely different conceptions of reality.”
HOW WE GOT HERE: PART IX—CHARLOTTESVILLE AS A CASE STUDY
This thread contains excerpts from Part IX of “How We Got Here.” This part uses the 2017 events in Charlottesville to illustrate many of the arguments from the treatise.
“I do not wish to re-open old wounds, but I would like to revisit the 2017 events in Charlottesville—because they are illustrative of many of this treatise's observations. It is my hope that readers will consider this case study with an open mind.”
“As with virtually all Trump-related political crises over the past four years, a substantial portion of the country was unmoved by the political left's uproar. How could this be?”
After four years of experiencing Trump’s assaults, we can and we must do better—because we all have the power to adjust our strategies to overcome his agenda.
3/
“To understand how we arrived at our present circumstances—and how the progressive movement may have done better in forestalling this scenario—we also need to more deeply examine the origins of extremist hate.”
“Hate does not arise in a vacuum. Hate arises from known conditions, especially severe inequality, which predispose certain populations to extremism. It is these conditions which make a population vulnerable to exploitation by a demagogue.”
This thread contains excerpts from Part VII of “How We Got Here.” This part focuses on the failure of the Democrats to speak to Trump's base, along with the empathy shortage in our politics.
“Instead of speaking to the grievances of Trump's base of supporters—many of which overlap with the grievances of other vulnerable groups—the Democrats have fallen for every ploy laid by Trump over the past four years.”
“In playing into his traps, they have effectively pitted themselves against his supporters, allowing members of this group to be further manipulated by a demagogue.”
This thread contains excerpts from Part VI of “How We Got Here.” This part addresses the personalization of politics and the need to instead focus on systems and ideas to achieve justice.
“Another fundamental problem in our political discourse, which spans the political spectrum but also applies to the progressive movement, has been the conflation of person and idea.”
“We can hate a person's speech without hating the person. In fact, we can hate a person's speech even while loving the person. Our discourse and debate must fundamentally revolve around ideas, not persons.”