Ever since David Chalmers formulated the "hard problem" in consciousness studies, this debate gained importance in scientific inquiry. Both sides (physicalist view & primacy of consciousness) have prominent voices. Premature for @AbhijitChavda to dismiss either side flippantly.
This is a key area of Western digestion of Indian thought:
- Leibniz being considered origin of theory
- Panentheism being credited to Hartshorne though he got it from studying Jiva Goswami
- Panpsychism credited to numerous Westerners is a digested form of Saguna Brahman.
🙏
- Leibniz being considered origin of theory
- Panentheism being credited to Hartshorne though he got it from studying Jiva Goswami
- Panpsychism credited to numerous Westerners is a digested form of Saguna Brahman.
🙏
My 2nd new book coming in January (not related to SNT book) discusses where this debate is headed - not where I want.
A subsequent series of books planned for later 2021 discusses the digestion of seminal Indian ideas in this field, i.e. colonization of the discourse.
A subsequent series of books planned for later 2021 discusses the digestion of seminal Indian ideas in this field, i.e. colonization of the discourse.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
