1) He's about to launch a whole-cloth spinoff of The Boys, so ... too many what now?

2) Really? That's his takeaway from the MCU? Sit on your ass?

This fucking guy. Image
The people who are supposed to represent "you" in The Boys are ... The Boys.

Who have superpowers.

Who are, in fact, grim-and-gritty superheroes no matter how much the material itself denies it.

So ... the fuck was your point, mate? Image
And then there's this bit.

If you react to the earnest with rage and the sentimental with anger, maybe what you're watching isn't the problem. Image
I would like to point out that during his run on Supernatural, Kripke wrote a writer who was secretly God so make of that what you will.
Personally I'm waiting for the mature and thoughtful adaptation of the "Ladyfold" character, myself.

Look it up.

Don't eat anything first.
Yes, but the DCAU isn't popular *right now,* and therefore shitting on it won't get any attention.

You have to choose where you shit very carefully.
And they even made a joke about Batman's parents getting murdered.

And so help me god, it was actually *funny.*
Listen: if you want a show that takes the piss out of superheroes, The Tick comes from a heartfelt place and so does Harley Quinn (though it's a bit more ruthless about it).

They're obviously made by people who love the material but can still poke fun and crack a joke.
Considering the entire G-Men arc is "HEY WHAT IF PROFESSOR X WAS REALLY A PEDOPHILE AND HE WAS FUCKING ALL THE X-MEN WHEN THEY WERE LIKE 9 YEARS OLD," I expect them to us it to teach us all to save ourselves or whatever.
Also that arc was capstoned with a crate of 9 year olds superheroes-in-training being thrown out of a plane and was presented as humor.

The nine year olds died.

SATIRE!
PS Billy Butcher's endgame in The Boys is genocide.

Actual literal genocide. He attempts to murder everyone on the planet who has the chemical that causes superheroes in them, whether they have powers or not.

But if they adapt that, the audience rebels.

And they like money.
I still can't believe they adapted that 9/11 shit (the ACTUAL 9/11).

Did they keep the part where Ennis Monday Morning quarterbacked that the President should have just shot down all the planes without hesitation and everything would have been fine?
If you don't realize this for the cynical bullshit it is, let me lay it out:

1) Make repulsive comic.
2) Get attention.
3) Get movie/TV deal on the back of that attention.
4) Sanitize the adaptation to keep audiences from storming off.
5) Profit.
See also every goddamn thing Mark Millar did for over a decade.

They helped ruin comics, lower the bar and encourage the worst possible readers while making all the rest run for the hills.
I really can't wrap my head around "Yes I know the source material is repulsive filth and its message is terrible but you know this other thing derived from that filth and message is really good."

If you're working that hard to separate them, think about why you have to.
From the creator of The Boys comes Crossed.

Do you like zombies? Well, what if the zombies hold you down and rape you!

Graphically! On multiple pages!

I'm not kidding.

And I don't doubt it's been optioned.
Yup.

The more you read it, and the more you take it in context, the more stupid it gets.
That's the entire point.

People who option stories for adaptation apparently don't really care much what's in them, only that they're very buzz-worthy in their home medium.

And writers like Millar and Ennis short-circuit the process to cynically profit.
For the longest time, two books at Marvel topped the charts:

Ultimate Spider-Man, and The Ultimates (which was Ultimate Avengers but Millar hated the name "Avengers").

Spidey was kind of heartfelt and good.

Ultimates had the Hulk eat a bad guy alive then shit him out.
The Ultimates helped start a race-to-the-bottom in the 2000s. Comic books became more and more horrific.

Why?

Because Mark Millar was making an ungodly amount of money optioning his repulsive comics, so other writers attempted the same.
By the end, lots of readers just noped out, the base audience for comics dwindled significantly and Millar has production credits and a big chunk of money from both his own adapted comics and the MCU.

And all they had to do was ruin comic books.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nash Across the 8th Dimension

Nash Across the 8th Dimension Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Nash076

21 Oct
This one's a runner up for WTFIWWY this week.

You gotta admit, this is clever. It was easy to fool the automated checkout and this wasn't even his first time doing it.

Know what stopped him?

A REAL HUMAN BEING DOING ACTUAL WORK local21news.com/news/offbeat/s…
The automated systems have cameras that supposedly watch you scanning things. (Walmart's system is notoriously bad, check the article.)

But you can fool it if you have a bar code for another item.
wired.com/story/walmart-…
In theory, you could make this scam even more bulletproof:

1) Photocopy the Kool-Aid UPC bar code.
2) Print it onto labels.
3) Palm the labels and stick them on the items.
4) Pay $0.25 for an entire bedroom set.
Read 5 tweets
20 Oct
I'm sorry, do you try to secretly masturbate during a work meeting? In proximity to your coworkers?

Did you do that before the pandemic?

Do you try to secretly masturbate during work meetings now?

Because I'm really sure not everyone is that tacky and thoughtless.
Like, everybody rubs one out, sure.

Not everybody rubs one out while in the middle of a group work setting, virtual or not.

Silly bastard didn't even go to the bathroom first.
Dude works at one of the biggest mastheads in our modern hellscape, post-Me Too, and you don't think some inappropriately planned onanism will get national attention?

Wait for the meeting to end then flip it up slap it rub it down all you want, but work time is work time.
Read 7 tweets
19 Oct
If there was child porn on the hard drive (there wasn't) that belonged to Hunter Biden (which it didn't), then copying it and handing it off to another party would be INCREDIBLY FUCKING ILLEGAL.

In their rush to ratfuck the election they're making themselves into fantasy felons.
Speaking as an IT tech who has repaired computers for a living, here's what you do when you find child porn on a customer's drive:

1) You call the police.
2) You give them the drive.
3) You wait while they tear through your network looking for copies and asking you questions.
4) You do not make a copy.
5) You DO NOT make a copy.
6) Holy Christ what is wrong with you you DO NOT MAKE A COPY
7) STOP MAKING COPIES OH MY GOD ARE YOU INSANE
Read 7 tweets
18 Oct
Why yes, I am a fan of the hit show Dogfuckers.

Now, I know what you're thinking: it's based on that wretched Dogfuckers book about fucking dogs. I hate that book. It's awful.

But the Dogfuckers TV show is great. They leave out a lot of the dogfucking and it speaks to me.
Right!

He doesn't fuck the dogs, he makes love to them.
Read 4 tweets
18 Oct
New project time!

A long while back, I picked up one of these: a Vox AC4TV. Little 4 watt amp with an attenuator and a 10" speaker.

And it was just ... bad. Boxy sound, broke up way to fast, too much high end.

So I resolved to make it better. Image
The first thing I tried was chasing it from a closed-back cabinet to an open back, by cutting some of the material off.

That helped a little, but it was still way too bright. ImageImage
It also had some nasty hum.

Part of the problem is, well ... it's a very cheap PCB-based tube amp. Sometimes you can do those well with no issues, but this thing was way too compact. It needed a revamp. Image
Read 34 tweets
12 Sep
This is the madness of modern copyright:

The people who create the music can't play their music because the people who published their albums own their music.
Because the audiences are so large and the rules for collecting royalties on streamed songs is so byzantine (trust me, I know), Facebook is simply disallowing all of it.

One of the biggest companies on the planet simply can't contend with managing copyright.

Think about that.
The more people watch your stream, the more you owe for playing a song. You have to monitor how many people were listening, when, and to what song.

You have to compile this data and send it for processing to determine the royalties you owe.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!