A lot of the responses that I’m getting from my students about their mid-semester grade reports indicate to me that a lot of them aren’t doing okay but are trying their best.
This also includes the students who are doing well in our classes.
So, maybe we should be a little more compassionate about the amount of work we assign, the kinds of work we assign, and the ways that we structure our pedagogical environments. By “a little more compassionate” I mean way more.
Like... Students shouldn’t have begin their emails with an apology for their struggles, nor should they feel ashamed for reaching out for help, nor should they have to study in an environment where they’ve been taught that this is normal.
What are we even doing to our students?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I’m just gonna say the quiet part out loud: very few of the COVID responses by higher-ed center disability, either in faculty or students. Any accessibility gains as a result are purely coincidental and dependent on a the benevolence of ableist institutions.
I fully anticipate any accessibility gains during this time to be rolled all the way back once the crisis has passed, regardless of the capacity of institutions to make these accommodations available.
You know who could stop this? Able bodied faculty, staff, and admin.
You know who won’t lift a finger? Those same folks.
Also, professional societies? You just proved that grad students and contingent faculty don’t need to pay for flights and hotels to present at conferences. There’s no reason why you can’t normalize this practice.
Of the thirteen applications that I'm submitting, four are in philosophy. Of the four in philosophy, only one asks for Asian Philosophy.
This time last year, I submitted three times the number of philosophy applications.
Welcome to the pandemic job market.
The only reason I have thirteen applications total is because my research interests (and teaching) are broadly interdisciplinary in ways that allow me to apply for positions beyond the field of philosophy and into some adjacent fields, like STS.
Not everyone has that option.
I don't really have any advice here. I do want to say that things are bad out on the market and hopefully recognition of how bad they are will encourage some compassion and some reconsideration of the torturous process of applying to jobs in academia.
Doing some thinking/writing about the "able-body" as a form of property vis a vis Harris' work in "Whiteness as Property," which can be inherited via the phenomenological mechanisms that Ahmed lays out in "Phenomenology of Whiteness." (1/n)
Which, apparently, requires me to read some Foucault (or secondaries) and his work on institutions in conjunction with the history of the medicalization of disability to present the world as "prepared" for the able body, as ready for its arrival in many important senses. (2/n)
Mark Johnson's recent book actually helps make my argument for me via his deployment of pragmatism (which I do NOT agree with) in the organization of society. I could just use all Johnson here, but that would miss how his view is structured by the above. (3/n)
Victory Gundam so far: a fascist insurgency has been waging war all across the earth, and the Federal Government is too inept or too weak to stop it. Said fascist government has been using the guillotine as a tool to terrorize earth's population in addition to giant robots. (1/n)
As a result of this endless war, a civilian arms company has built and armed what amounts to a militia formed of ex-Federation soldiers and anti-fascists as well as civilians that just happened to be in the warzone to combat the fascist insurgency. (2/n)
I wish I was making the part about the guillotine up: (fin)
I say a reality because many STS initiatives that address bias and inequality as perpetuated by or naturalized in technology rely upon federal grant funding to do their work. Similarly, work in inequality in medicine and education also receives federal grant funding. (2/n)
Moreover, scholars in STS and adjacent fields are often evaluated for tenure and promotion, for jobs, on the basis of the grant monies that they bring in. This order would effectively eliminate that possibility and imperil research centers that are focused on this work. (3/n)
Sun Tzu said, "In difficult ground, press on; On hemmed-in ground, use subterfuge; In death ground, fight."
Right, so: some of us have been living on death ground while our allies have insisted it is merely difficult or encircled ground and thus underestimated the threat. (1/n)
This difference between the kinds of ground we think we're standing on is crucial as, if you don't realize you're on death ground, if you merely think you're on encircled ground, the tactics you'll use to fight will be insufficient to ensure your victory. (2/n)
Which gets me to another Sun Tzu quote: “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles." Part of knowing your enemy is knowing the kind of fight you're in. Some of us have long since known the kind of fight that we're in. (3/n)