John Hayward Profile picture
19 Oct, 16 tweets, 3 min read
The Wuhan coronavirus is perhaps the worst example of "narrative journalism" to date, especially since the media's preferred narratives track so closely with the political goals of the Chinese Communist Party.
The CCP's first objective was to prevent domestic panic and political unrest from becoming a threat to its power. Global media obligingly ran with a narrative that draconian measures taken by the Chinese government swiftly brought the virus under control.
Next the CCP needed the virus to spread rapidly beyond China's borders. Global media was suddenly humming with stories about how travel bans were irrational xenophobic evil and nothing could keep the virus from spreading around the world.
Once the virus was firmly entrenched in other countries, the CCP needed the rest of the world to go nuts with economy-killing lockdowns. The media said anyone who questioned Lockdown Forever ideology was a homicidal maniac who wanted to sacrifice Grandma for the stock market.
Much of the Western World, including most of the United States, remains in the grip of full or partial lockdown ideology, including schools. The damage to children will be generational in character. China used the virus to strike crippling blows against its global adversaries.
And now the media is running with coronavirus narratives designed to replace a U.S. president who fights against Chinese domination with one who is, shall we say, much more hospitable to the CCP's political and economic agenda.
It was the worst of narrative journalism every step of the way - inconvenient facts ignored or suppressed with astonishing ruthlessness, inconvenient questions silenced with howls of heresy, all of it built on the fantasy of controlling the spread of a virus without quarantines.
Global media narratives were easily corrupted by using false information from Communist China. Both explicitly and implicitly, coverage of the coronavirus assumes the CCP is basically telling the truth, but in reality they've lied every step of the way.
The world became obsessed with the fantasy of a large nation using lockdowns to eradicate the virus, when in reality China simply lied about how widely it spread, easily concealed the relatively small number of deaths and hospitalizations, and pretended to do loads of testing.
Leave China's corrupt information out of the mix, look only at the places where hard facts can be verified, and it looks like only small and geographically isolated areas were able to "crush" the coronavirus - and they relied heavily on traditional quarantines/travel bans.
Everyone else is left scratching their heads as the coronavirus mysteriously "resurges" in "waves" despite economy-killing lockdowns and mask mandates. The places that quarantined the healthy instead of the sick are in very bad shape when it comes to much-derided "herd immunity."
Everyone remains confused and frightened because the media underplays or suppresses information that contradicts its preferred narratives, so we're left with a seemingly unbeatable pandemic, a virus with completely irrational characteristics, a crisis that doesn't make sense.
And the metrics keep changing to support the media's narratives, so we went from focusing on mortality rates and hospitalization to obsessing over the far more protean and less meaningful metric of "cases." If we were still using the metrics from April, we'd be far less panicked.
We were stampeded away from using the methods we know are effective, and importantly COST-effective, with benefits that are not outweighed by those nasty side effects and "unintended consequences" the media doesn't want to talk about.
Quarantines, travel bans, protecting the most vulnerable populations, mitigating hospitalizations, and carrying on with our lives so we have the social and economic strength to handle the damage from the inevitable spread of a highly contagious disease - that approach works.
That approach is the ONLY thing that works in a huge country with swift and easy travel between major population centers. We were driven mad with the fantasy of emulating tiny island nations, or the false "success" claimed by a brutal, mendacious Communist dictatorship. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Hayward

John Hayward Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Doc_0

20 Oct
The latest addition to the lexicon of totalitarianism is "Badfact."

A Badfact is objectively true, but it damages the political narratives of the ruling elite, so everyone must be prevented from thinking about it. The accuracy of the Badfact is never seriously challenged.
The most common technique for suppressing Badfacts is the "mostly false" factcheck, which is based not on disputing the accuracy of the Badfact, but on insisting that some mystical "context" is needed to understand the "greater truth" surrounding it.
With this technique, totalitarians convince their victims that thinking about the 100% true Badfact is, in essence, lying to themselves because there is a secret Deeper Truth that is more important than the deceptively simple truth they have been told to ignore.
Read 10 tweets
16 Oct
One of the most polarizing things about this election is that nobody can imagine anyone voting for the other guy after listening to him talk for five minutes. "You Gotta Be Kidding Me" should be the slogan for the entire contest.
I confess I have this reaction too. Trump frequently says, and tweets, things I find exasperating. Rarely have I seen anyone work so hard to talk himself out of a job. But I listen to Biden talk and I can't believe anyone would be foolish enough to vote for him.
Biden can't even finish his sentences properly when he's regurgitating 30-year-old talking points. The man clearly is not all there. I guess his supporters are just talking themselves into ignoring it because they hate Trump, or because they know Biden's just a figurehead.
Read 6 tweets
16 Oct
Why would hostile foreign powers and shady characters keep paying Hunter Biden millions of dollars for access, year after year, if he never delivered any?
The media/Biden campaign (but I repeat myself) framing for this story is that some shifty foreigners stuffed cash into Hunter's pockets one time, then found him passed out in a bathtub with a crack pipe and cursed themselves for fools, as if he had conned them.
But that's not what happened AT ALL. Shifty foreigners and outright enemies of the United States paid Hunter Biden huge sums to buy access, over and over again, for years. He's not some fake Nigerian prince who swindled people one time and then scurried away with the loot.
Read 5 tweets
15 Oct
I wrote about Internet freedom a few hours before it suddenly became a massive crisis in the United States, so the post (and the Freedom House report I discussed) became an instant time capsule. The questions I asked are more urgent than ever:

breitbart.com/national-secur…
"Disinformation" is treated by analysts as a menace to Internet freedom, but so are the measures employed to combat it. The worst totalitarian regimes on Earth justify Internet repression as efforts to control disinformation. We're getting a taste of that in America right now.
"Cyber sovereignty" means states like China establishing their own little Internet backwaters, ruled according to their definitions of acceptable speech, hate speech, disinformation, and sedition.

We have that too. In America, cyber sovereignty is imposed by Big Tech moguls.
Read 16 tweets
15 Oct
It's so weird that the big social media platforms simultaneously decided to throw away their "platform, not a publisher" protection to suppress a flimsy nothingburger story that should be like the buzzing of flies to a candidate with an insurmountable lead in the polls.
It almost makes you wonder if maybe that candidate knew even worse revelations were coming, so he got in touch with his very dear friends at the social media giants and told them to crush the early releases at all costs, to shut the whole chain of stories down.
DNC Media long ago mastered the art of the soft embargo. They simply refuse to amplify stories that don't fit their precious political narratives, while the stories that DO fit get wall-to-wall coverage. They don't confront Democrats about inconvenient stories.
Read 9 tweets
14 Oct
It's funny how so many people who claim to worship "democracy" also dismiss nationalism as selfish xenophobia. Democracy is absolutely meaningless without strong national sovereignty. Under globalism, citizens of any given state have little influence over how they are governed.
Nationalism isn't just mindless tribalism. People are correct to insist their government has a responsibility TO THEM that vastly outweighs any imagined responsibility to foreign governments they have absolutely no influence over, or foreign populations.
We've seen that point taken to absurd extremes by the Left during the Trump administration, with whack-job judges ruling that foreigners have rights that EXCEED those of American citizens, including absolute rights to enter the U.S. and influence its government.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!