I'm going to tweet about this 1 more time since 2019. The way we know the Hunter Biden "scandal" is BS is it has ALWAYS been BS. Victor Shokin was corrupt & forced to resign by global pressure, including from EU, IMF, institutional investors & USA. Let's just discuss IMF.../1
...Shokin was a corrupt guy who let Ukraine corruption flourish - including by letting Mykola Zlochevsky (a government official and founder of Burisma) to skate on public corruption and bribery charges. There was never a Burisma investigation. The corruption of Shokin was..../2
...a global issue given Ukraine's importance vis a vis Russia. Biden made his statement in December 2015, after EU & institutional investors had threatened to pull out of investing in Ukraine because of Shokin. Nothing happened.
THEN, 2 months later, Lagarde, the IMF head.../3
...threatened to pull $17 billion (and ultimately $34 billion) of financial support for Ukraine unless it rooted out corruption. IMF officials said this was directly targeted at Shokin....
...Shokin had also been identified globally by anticorruption officials as undermining corruption fight in Ukraine. More than 100 members of the Ukrainian parliament had already called for his ouster. But it was IMF that finally got president to act....
...the pressure on President Poroshenko to fire Shokin became overwhelming because not only was the $17 billion of IMF money part of $40 billion total, but it could not be made up by institutional investors. The US portion was just a loan *guarantee* and nothing more. The IMF...
...investment could well have freed up other money to cover the value of the guarantee. But once the IMF said it would pull everything, the only choices for Poroshenko was fire Shokin or preside over an economic collapse. So Poroshenko caved...ft.com/content/44c164…
...then it got worse. On February 15, five days after IMF threatened to pull its money, Deputy Prosecutor-General Vitaliy Kasko went on national television and resigned, accusing Shokin of hindering corruption investigations. This set off more demands in Ukraine for Shokin's....
...ouster. Four days later, under pressure from Poroshenko, Shokin resigned.
So, timing: Biden gives his statement in December, 2015. Nothing happens. IMF issues its threat on Feb 10, 2016. Poroshenko pledges to IMF to fight corruption. Five days...
...later, Shokin's deputy resigns, accusing him of corruption to protect oligarchs (like Burisma founder who, again, had been under investigation for accepting bribes while a government official, a case Shokin killed.) Four days later, Poroshenko announces Shokin has resigned...
...now, did Biden say something that was not true? Yes. When he said he made his threat to Ukraine and days (hours?) later Shokin was gone, that was not true. Whether there was a second statement by him, he misremembered, or he told a falsehood, it was the IMF, Shokin's deputy...
..& members of Ukraine Parliament who drove out Shokin.
No Burisma investigation. Global pressure for Shokin to resign. IMF and deputy's resignation finally causes Poroshenko to demand Shokin's resignation.
This is all indisputable. Everything Rudy says are demonstrable lies...
...and who is one of Rudy's key "witnesses."? Viktor Shokin! The son of a bitch that the IMF, the EU, the USA, the Ukrainian parliament and institutional investors demanded be fired because of his corruption. Shokin has used Rudy's BS to file in Ukraine to get his job back....
...all of this depends on the stupidity of Americans and the lies of Fox News and GOP. That they are willing to undermine Ukrainian sovereignty - which Trump demonstrated in his threats that led to his impeachment - shows that they are *America's* version of Shokin: corrupt to...
...the core, liars, willing to carry water for Russia - which wants Shokin (their puppet) back in office. This is a three-fer for Russia: Help their guy in Ukraine, undermine the Ukrainian democracy, and manipulate the US elections. And Republicans cheer and dance to help.
end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 2017, I wrote that GOP tax cuts were a catastrophe for USA because they came at a time of economic strength and massive debt - something never been done in history of the world. The problem, I said, was that there would inevitably be an economic.../1
...turn, one that could easily transform into a disaster because of the precarious nature of our fiscal house caused by the cuts. The big danger: The interest on the debt as a percent of the budget. We are borrowing more money to pay the interest, which means we are paying....,/2
...more interest, which means we have to borrow more, etc. Traditionally, during a financial catastrophe, government increases spending and cuts taxes. But, because of GOP recklessness, we did the *opposite* - increased spending and cut taxes during boom times. It is like.../3
This election year is the ultimate evidence that the GOP is an anti-American, anti-democracy relic of a white racist past that must die. The massive lines for voting, the millions of hurdles placed in front of an exercise that is supposed to be *encouraged,* not suppressed.../1
...that is hindered by a minority party that regularly fails to win the popular vote, that is opposed by the majority of voters at all levels of federal government, & that has nothing to offer but lies, conspiracy theories, racism and voter suppression. This morning, one of.../2
...my sons was bemoaning that we dont have a system like in Australia, where voting is mandatory. When I asked why, his answer was so revealing: "Then I'd have a government working to help me vote and make it easier, not trying to stop me from voting by making it hard".../3
While @BenSasse gives his "Oh, Im so much purer than everyone else, let me tell you about civics," let's discuss what a lying sleaze he is.
He declared in 2016 that Merrick Garland would not be confirmed. Period..../1
...so the president and the senate can do whatever they want under the Constitution. Got it.
2nd, he said hed confirm only if Obama's nominee specifically repudiated the very concept that Obama used sometimes, but Sasse cheered when Trump made it a hallmark of his presidency...
...oh, and once again, he said of COURSE he would confirm a nominee, if of course, that nominee followed the policy prescriptions Sasse wanted, until Trump took unilateralism and turned it into a sledgehammer, to Sasse's cheers....
Just to show why I will dedicate my life to tearing the GOP to the ground, a few items I have written over the years which might put meat on the bones of my rage.
Ah, @RichLowry - the intellectual lightweight or fraud. Ok Rich - so *technically,* if you want to play that game, court packing only refers to FDR's efforts with Judicial Procedures Reform Bill. Why was that different than, say, the size changes in 1801, 1807, 1837, 1868.../1
...because expansion/contraction was only nakedly partisan in 1868 and 1937. But the idea here, @RichLowry, was the underlying effort could either be or not be pure partisanship to swing the ideology of the court. Now, the GOP has done just that - blocking nominees to hold open..
...a seat for partisan purposes, rushing a nominee for purely partisan purposes. They have *packed* the court, @RichLowry, with a singular ideology by abusing the advice and consent standard to a point that would make the Founders throw up. This CANT stand. This country cant...
With the GOP packing the court NOW, and @MSNBC and @CNN reporters breaking out the fainting couches about what Biden would do: Why weren't they wailing when the GOP said they would not confirm ANYONE if Hillary Clinton won the election in 2016?..../1
...or even worse, the conservative think tanks that argued the supreme court should be allowed to DIE rather than allowing Clinton to seat nominees... cato.org/publications/c…
..so now, they go "Oh...why won't biden say what he will do?'" Because, you morons: 1. The GOP has not succeeded yet in its packing effort that you are treating as acceptable. 2. He doesnt know yet if the court will flip to a purely political body, 6-3.