Thread: With all due respect to Jo, @Frances_Coppola, and @SteveBakerHW's other critics, and at the risk of being told I also don't understand public finances, I think Steve is right to be concerned.
Steve is hardly alone. In March, Fitch Ratings, noting that the UK's deficit, already at post-1960 record relative to GDP, will "increase to well over 120% of GDP over the next few years," cut its UK credit rating to -AA, a rating it recently re-affirmed. theguardian.com/business/2020/…
Just recently Moody's also downgraded UK debt, to AA3, ft.com/content/117349… Of course, these are hardly "doomsday" ratings; and no one thinks that the UK is about to default. It's even possible that the folks at Moody's and Fitch also don't know their public finances.
Nevertheless, there is reason for concern. The reason isn't that the UK might default, or even that it will have difficulty borrowing in the future. It's that the likelihood of either higher real interest rates or unwanted inflation in the future is increasing.
Note that "in the future." At present, there is no serious risk of either outcome. It's the combination of a protracted recovery, heavy post-COVID crisis borrowing and spending, compounded by reduced post-Brexit output, that has raised concerns, and not just among deficit hawks.
Modern Monetary Theorists rightly insist that a sovereign currency-issuing nation need never default or"run out of money." But they also recognize--though not on every occasion when they ought to!--that there is such a thing as a "real resource constraint."
Today that constraint isn't binding. Nor has it been binding for some time. But once recovery occurs, the projected, continued heavy government borrowing is likely to result _either_ in unwanted inflation _or_ higher interest rates that will contain inflation, though...
...only by limiting private investment as well as consumer borrowing. In short, while the government will almost certainly go on paying its bills, it won't do so without the public feeling the pinch.
Reasonable people can of course disagree concerning whether this prospect should "alarm" Britons. Some may also claim that, alarming or not, the prospect, if real, is a price worth paying for present emergency efforts.
Nevertheless the suggestion that there's no reason at all to worry over the state of UK public finances is, IMHO,no less suggestive of an inadequate understanding of those finances than Steve's opposite view.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with George Selgin

George Selgin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GeorgeSelgin

31 Aug
"I've been framed!" The Phillip's Curve pleads innocent. (Thread.)

I know what you're thinking: I'm supposed to be dead, or at least to be on death row, having been found guilty of causing the Fed to repeatedly over-tighten over the years.
But I've never had a chance to defend myself. And I think I deserve that much. I mean, its my 6th amendment right! And although I know I look guilty, I'm telling you, you've rushed to judgement.
I know I'm easy to suspect. After all, I've been guilty in the past. And I'm not especially respectable, let alone reliable. I'm also managed to alienate pretty much everyone-- first Monetarists and Austrians None thinks of me as at all upright. cato.org/publications/c…
Read 14 tweets
22 Aug
Thread: In this brief video, Steve Forbes says that there are "mountains of myths surrounding the gold standard, all of them wrong." But he himself subscribes to several: forbes.com/sites/stevefor… 1/
Myth #1: "When you see the price of it [gold] fluctuate, what you see is the value of the dollar fluctuating." Of course the dollar's value _in terms of gold_ fluctuates neither more no less than gold's value in terms of the dollar. The relevant question... 2/
...is, "which is fluctuating more in terms of the prices of goods in general?" Have a look at this chart comparing relative changes in the $ price of gold and the CPI since the end of the last recession, and decide for yourself:
Read 13 tweets
16 Aug
@dandolfa I believe very strongly that the claim that money is a "Store of Value" is one of the great errors of monetary theory. Of course money must have some such capacity to be useful; but that is just another way of saying that it mustn't be too perishable to be a convenient MofE. 1/
@dandolfa The idea that money is distinguished by its capacity to serve as an SofV is false. The best SofVs are typically not MofEs, and when these differ its the MofEs that are regarded as money. 2/
@dandolfa Suppose I _Defined" a car as (1) a means of transportation, and (2) a store of value. That double-barrelled definition would enhance our understanding of cars in the same way that the common double (if not triple) barrel definition of money has enhanced our understanding of it 3/
Read 4 tweets
16 Aug
Thread: 3 wrong theories of bank money creation: (1) An ordinary bank must wait for reserves (deposits) to come its way in order to make loans; if they seem to maintain an 5% reserve ratio, then they can only lend 95% or deposits received.
(2) An ordinary bank can create money equal to a multiple of reserves (deposits) received. So if it receives X dollars and maintain 5% reserves, it can lend 20 times X.
(3) An ordinary bank can create money "out of thin air," with no need to either possess or to acquire funds by which to finance loans it commits to make, and hence no need to worry about either its actual reserve or the cost of securing funds from elsewhere.
Read 13 tweets
23 Jul
Thread: I consider a return to a gold standard neither desirable nor possible. But like too many who also reject the idea, Michael Hiltzik @hiltzikm is long on contempt for the idea, but short on understanding of the gold standard's actual record.latimes.com/business/story…
Hiltzik says that "On the far right, the gold standard era is cherished as a beacon of economic stability. Modern economic thought finds that to be the opposite of the truth." But one needn't be on the "far right" to see merit in the "classical" or pre-1914 gold standard.
That ca. 1871-1914 system did prove stable in certain obvious respects: indeed, it was the only regime ever to combine the features of long-run price level stability and fixed exchange rates. Keynes himself recognized these virtues.
Read 27 tweets
16 Jul
Reading G.M. Trevelyan's _History of England_, I came across a paragraph that seems quite pertinent today, concerning the establishment of Great Britain's police force by Sir Robert Peel (hence "Bobbies" and "Peelers").
"[I]n 1829 [Peel] established for the first time an efficient civilian Police, whom the populace endearingly called by either of his two names, Their social value in dealing with common crime was equaled by their political value in dealing with Radical mobs:
"for at last the place of the soldiers had been taken by a civic force armed only with batons, who were none the less capable of looking a mob in the face, and who, unlike the soldiers, could be used to quell the first signs of disturbance.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!