On every side of a case there is a right, a believed truth, and a position. In many instances the only way to resolve who is actually right in fact or at law, is to litigate the particular issue.
Litigation comes with great burdens. Two such burdens (and there are many more) being cost and the exposure of matters and people in open court that ordinarily may not wish for such outings. Take for example a defamation, injury, or a tragic loss.
Courts too, are not infallible. So, often the most complicated of cases only become resolved at appellate level, and where matters of European Union law arise that are not so obvious or clear, they must be referred to the Court of Justice in Luxembourg.
So here we have cases like Hay v O’Grady and Doyle v Banville to allow a party unpick an effort of fact or law, usually predicated upon a failure to consider evidence or a misapplication of the law.
Lawyers are often asked for opinions. Clients state facts and an opinion on the law is rendered. A client who may not like a particular opinion, may seek opinions from whoever he or she likes and it can often be the case that opinions vary wildly depending on fact and law.
The process of seeking advice is one thing. Taking and or heeding it, is an entirely different matter.
The Irish bar and solicitors bar is chocked full of specialists who regularly advise on areas fully in their comfort zones and areas of expertise.
In the same way as the State might choose to ignore a particular set of advices to advance a political or social agenda, where a balance might occur. There are multiple examples of this.
But one thing is for sure. You can debate who is right, or who is wrong, till the cows come home. Ultimately, it is a matter for the courts to decide.
I find twitter useful for keeping up with debates and new aspects of law and developments. It is also useful for seeing what certain academics and practitioners have to say on issues.
There are two sides to every case. To every story. To every twitter frisson. And that concludes my stream of consciousness for today.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ronan Lupton

Ronan Lupton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ronanlupton

12 Jul
This Thursday sees judgment in Facebook Ireland and Schrems in
Case C-311/18 at 09:30 CET.
The case was controversial for a number of reasons. First, SCCs - Standard Contractual Clauses, the now outdated clauses that undertakings can use for cross border data flows Decision 2010/87; and
Second, Privacy Shield. Which is an agreement between the US and EU from July 2016 concerning data transfers.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!