Fall seems to be the season for Mobility-as-a-Service panels and debates.
Speaking at several has led me to reflect on my own MaaS journey, summarized in the 🧵 below (w/article links).
TLDR: Despite great promise and hype, very few people use MaaS today. We need new models.
2/ I first learned about MaaS ~5 years ago. It offered a captivating vision: Leverage new technology to knit together trips on transit, bikeshare, carshare, scooters etc to improve cities and reduce private driving.
I was fascinated and wanted to learn more.
3/ 2 years ago I heard a top US transportation guru cite Helsinki as the future of urban mobility “because everyone there uses Whim, a MaaS app, to get around town.”
I then met several Finns who disagreed. That led to this article, my first about MaaS. citylab.com/perspective/20…
4/ Neutral startup platforms weren’t the only ones promoting MaaS at the time.
Uber’s CEO said he wanted to be the “Amazon of transportation.”
That struck me as dangerous. I wrote this article warning about what I call “mobility walled gardens.” fastcompany.com/90261748/why-u…
5/ The deeper I got into MaaS, the more I realized that *any* MaaS solution-- good or bad-- relies on government to improve transit, protect micromobility users, and price auto use higher.
9/ I’m still searching for evidence MaaS can meet its hype. But I’m not sure how, unless brave public officials lift transit + micromobility and suppress driving.
A city like Mayor Hidalgo's Paris could be a MaaS hotbed —*if* MaaS biz models work. forbes.com/sites/carltonr…