Thread: I spent many hours talking to the authors of the key federal document from 2007 that explains why the United States went into lockdown as the pandemic spread early this year--and why schools were closed. centerforhealthsecurity.org/cbn/2007/cbnre…
Their research focused on the need for so-called non pharmaceutical interventions when a pandemic hit, and there were no known/proven vaccines or treatments.
I wrote a story early this year about the little-known federal employees who crafted this policy--and how their actions likely helped save countless lives this year @apoorva_nyc nytimes.com/2020/04/22/us/…
One core element in this 2007 report was the need to move quickly, once the virus was confirmed, and to consider gathering places, including closing schools--based on research of the 1918 flu outbreak
Yes, there was also a particular focus on the importance of considering closing schools--and this was controversial even back in 2007 when the policy was being formed. But the belief was that schools would play a major role in virus spread.
So why am I writing this thread? Just reflecting as the debate continues over role schools have played in this real-life pandemic. It may be as my colleague @apoorva_nyc wrote, that schools (particularly at elementary level) are not a major vector. nytimes.com/2020/10/22/hea…
I still admire greatly the work that the team of pandemic experts did back more than a decade ago to develop the social distancing policy. They could never have known what the specific virus might be--who was more or less contagious. They developed a plan. We used it.
Their plan also never envisioned that the entire United States would have to go into lockdown. It was called "Targeted Layered Nonpharmaceutical Measures." Only reason a national lockdown was necessary was in 2020 was US didn't have a robust testing system. We were flying blind.
Yes, we are about to enter a period when all closure steps we took will be re-evaluated. Key for future is to know where the virus is, as it begins to spread. Without that info, massive and economic and social disruption via widespread shutdowns will again be hard to avoid.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Eric Lipton

Eric Lipton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EricLiptonNYT

26 Oct
Death of a giant from the modern American coal industry, whose company Murray Energy went bankrupt. He had just recently announced his retirement.
Some of the NYT pieces on Bob Murray... A Coal Baron Funded Climate Denial as His Company Spiraled Into Bankruptcy @LFFriedman nytimes.com/2019/12/17/cli…
How a Coal Baron’s Wish List Became President Trump’s To-Do List @LFFriedman nytimes.com/2018/01/09/cli…
Read 4 tweets
16 Oct
JUST POSTED: Facing the prospect that President Trump could lose his re-election bid, his cabinet is scrambling to enact regulatory changes affecting millions of Americans in a blitz so rushed it may leave some changes vulnerable to court challenges nytimes.com/2020/10/16/us/…
Let's review a few of the rules changes being pushed through. It that touches almost every person in the United States. First off, a fundamentally new way to define "independent contractor," which now covers abt 19 million people in the US.
For millions and millions, this could impact whether they are "employees" or "contractors" and the work benefits and protections they get. Yet Labor Depart admits its not sure how this will change the workplace. And it is only offering folks 30 days to comment.
Read 8 tweets
5 Oct
SO JUST HOW HAD IS THE COAL SITUATION IN THE US, DESPITE TRUMP'S PROMISE? Let's look at some data. First off, coal production in the United States. It is tanking. Fastest decline DURING TRUMP since 1930s. Second fastest in US history. eia.gov/outlooks/steo/… Image
Here is coal production data back to 1856 to 1958. Only once before, during a SINGLE presidential term, has their been a faster decline in coal production in the U.S. than what we have seen with Trump. Image
What is driving this decline? Coal as a source of power production in the United States is in major decline. And the pace of that decline is accelerating. It will recover a bit next year, says EIA. But it is WAY down during Trump. ImageImage
Read 7 tweets
5 Oct
THREAD: DO YOU HAVE $1 BILLION DOLLARS WORTH OF RELIEF? The world's largest coal company came to the Trump administration with an extraordinary request. Help us save coal or at least ONE big Arizona coal-burning power plant, Navajo Generating Station.
The request was for the EPA to formally endorse a move that would allow the coal-burning plant to avoid an air pollution upgrade that would cost as much as $1 billion. Peabody's lobbyists submitted this as part of a wish list of Trump-era actions.
Peabody and its lobbyists held a series of meetings with Interior Department officials in early days of Trump admin, as they laid out their plan to get US government help to save the Arizona power plant that burned Peabody coal.
Read 13 tweets
5 Sep
THREAD: CAMPAIGN DOLLARS AS A TRUMP TOOL TO SILENCE CRITICS: One aspect we dig into in this piece is how Trump has used $$ donated by supporters to silence/intimidate ex aides who raised ??s abt actions by Trump or his campaign. LETS TAKE A DEEPER LOOK>>>> nytimes.com/2020/09/05/us/…
Trump's targets using donated campaign $$$s include Jessica Denson who alleged abusive treatment and sexual harassment by another campaign staff member. Trump filed arbitration claim here--and initially got $50,000 award against Denson. FULL DOC int.nyt.com/data/documentt…
She was just one target--FUNDED with campaign donations. Trump also used campaign $$ to go after OMAROSA MANIGAULT-NEWMAN. One time big booster of Trump who became a critic. Then target of legal action funded by donors. LINK TO FULL DOCUMENT int.nyt.com/data/documentt…
Read 9 tweets
5 Sep
JUST POSTED: Deep look at how Trump's campaign accounts were turned into Trump litigation fund used to punish ex aides who criticized him, to keep his tax returns secret, even to defend POTUS from lawsuits filed by people allegedly beaten at Trump rallies nytimes.com/2020/09/05/us/…
THE TRUMP DOCKET: NYT analysis with Campaign Finance Institute @cfinst_org, has found that Trump along with the RNC, spent nearly $60 million in campaign contributions through July on legal and compliance expenses, far more than any modern president. Let's take a look....
Several categories of cases used big campaign $$$--money of course donated. First, an effort to silence ex aides who said something critical, like Jessica Denson, former Hispanic outreach coordinator. Trump campaign became money pot to fuel legal action against his former aides
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!