Ok a lot of people are asking me why I think this is creepy. Here's why.
In traditional Ashkenazi Judaism, Vilnius was the primary center of learning--like some kind of mixture of Oxford and Cambridge MA.
The influence is so profound and so historically resonant that to this day, the main strain of non-hasidic ultra-Orthodoxy is known as "Lithuanian."
That community was wiped from the face of the Earth.
This was not the fault of the Lithuanian state, to be sure, any more than the Holocaust in Poland was the fault of the Polish state.
But to issue a coin on the birth of the Vilna Gaon feels to me a bit--off. I can't think of a good analogy for it it, to be honest, and I honor the intentions behind it. Really. I'm sure it was well meant. But it creeps me out.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The President of the United States has declared this week, "National Character Counts Week." Let's examine his proclamation line by line: whitehouse.gov/presidential-a…
"The foundation of any free and virtuous society is the moral character of its people."
I wholeheartedly agree.
"Personal responsibility, integrity, and the other values which define our unique American spirit underpin our system of self-government and inspire us to continue working toward a more perfect Union. "
The person who should write such a thread is @BobbyChesney, who did pioneering studies of how conspiracy and material support law changes pushed the criminal law further and further to the left of boom.
But the bottom line as pertains to this case is threefold: (1) conspiracy law is very broad. If you agree with one other person (or 12) to commit a serious felony and take a single overt act in furtherance of that agreement, you are guilty.
(2) under case law, the FBI is legally allowed to get deeply involved in facilitating your conspiracy by way of investigating it without getting anywhere near the line of entrapment, which requires that they induce you to commit the crime.
I refuse to discuss Amy Coney Barrett’s jurisprudence or character or views. The issue of her nomination should not be about that. It should be about the fact of her nomination in the first place.
The nomination stands for the proposition that an impeached president who demanded that a seat on the Supreme Court be held open for him to fill only four years ago should be able to fill a seat with only 38 to go before he faces the voters.
One nice thing about remote court hearings is that you don’t have to stand when the judge enters. Listening to the court call the status hearing in the @petestrzok and @NatSecLisa privacy act lawsuit in bed.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson has just announced that she is ruling on the government’s motions to dismiss and for for summary judgment in the cases. She will not be issuing a written opinion.
She is now giving the factual background. She says she has a LOT to say and that we should pour ourselves a cup of coffee.
Each is more than 30 pages. The language on white supremacy changes subtly but importantly, as I told @woodruffbets, across the drafts. I will highlight those changes as well.
I will also publish a more extensive analysis of the documents on @lawfareblog over the weekend.
Because somewhere, there is a 15-year-old girl being terrorized online, there's a gay kid getting get hate emails from someone at school, an African American college student who is putting up with degrading stuff a colleague would never say in public but sends in private.