For centuries, the "Blood Libel" theory held that Jews steal Christian children and consume their flesh and blood in Satanic rituals.

QAnon basically just replaces "Jews" with "Democrats." It's so popular because it recycles the same tropes. insider.com/qanon-conspira…
The thing about conspiracy theories is, even when they go out of fashion, often bits and pieces of them get recycled into new theories.

Because these common elements are familiar, they're an entry point for people who may have believed the old theories.
At the start, QAnon didn't have the blood libel or pedophilia stuff.

It was just vague ramblings about how there was a secret Trump operation to take out the Deep State. And gradually believers just added more and more evil stuff the Deep State was doing, to raise the stakes.
It's morbidly fascinating to watch how conspiracy theories evolve in real time, how communities and factions form around them, argue the details, and graft old tropes and personal paranoias onto them here and there until they have a life of their own.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matthew Chapman

Matthew Chapman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @fawfulfan

26 Oct
It's important to note that while Trump's brand of "They're rapists, they should go back where they came from" racism is what's tearing apart the country, Kushner's softer-spoken, condescending kind of racism has been the GOP default for years, long before Trump took over.
It is critical to understand that the whole GOP narrative of rugged individualism, that poverty is a moral failing and the govt can't help losers with no drive to be contributing, productive citizens, at its core began as a way to justify the ongoing consequences of segregation.
White voters, especially white voters in the South who had voted Democratic and felt betrayed by the Civil Rights Act, grew up being told Black people are lazy, unmotivated, and benefit enough just from being allowed to live in white society.
Read 6 tweets
26 Oct
People don't really understand how important this race is — it could actually have profound consequences. Here are a few things you should know.

First, the Texas Railroad Commission is not actually about railroads. It's the chief body overseeing the state oil and gas industry.
Texas is one of the biggest oil and gas producing states.

It's also the epicenter of a shady practice called "flaring," in which gas well operators burn off excess methane rather than capture it. This is cheaper, but it's also wasteful and a major source of greenhouse emissions.
Now, if you're a gas well operator in Texas, you do need a permit to flare your wells.

But the Railroad Commission, being controlled 3-0 by Republicans, grants these permits to basically everyone. Because Texas Republicans are not exactly known for being climate conscious.
Read 6 tweets
29 Sep
It seems like basically every "Democrat" who has endorsed Trump is a scandal-plagued basket case who has been on the outs with the party for years.
I mean, there's just such a vast gulf in quality and national prominence between them and the Republicans who've endorsed Biden — John Kasich, Tom Ridge, Cindy McCain, Sully Sullenberger, Colin Powell, Christine Whitman, John Warner, and that's just scratching the surface.
And that's not even mentioning all the people who WORKED IN the Trump administration who've endorsed Biden — Miles Taylor, Olivia Troye, Alexander Vindman, John Mitnick, etc.

As far as I know, the only member of the Obama-Biden admin endorsing Trump is... Michael Flynn 😂😂😂
Read 4 tweets
29 Sep
Exactly.

Republicans have attacked the individual mandate for years, but the individual mandate was never what they were really mad about.

Their real target is the law's Medicare taxes and investment taxes, which are much bigger and mostly fall on the top 0.1%.
That is why even after Republicans got rid of the individual mandate in 2017 — the thing they said they hated about the law — they STILL filed that bogus lawsuit to overturn the whole thing, including pre-existing conditions, which they claim they actually support.
Because in order to protect pre-existing conditions, you have to pay low- and middle-income people money to buy health insurance. A lot of money. Those subsidies on the health exchanges are big. Medicaid expansion is big.

And the ACA raises that money by taxing the GOP's donors.
Read 5 tweets
27 Sep
People like @gtconway3d hail from a culture where judges are expected to be evaluated only by their qualifications and knowledge of the law, and not their political beliefs or the policy consequences of their rulings. But the GOP is VERY MUCH evaluating judges by the latter now.
I get — I really do — why @gtconway3d wants us to stick to the traditional understanding of the role of judges. It's a norm! But he's been in FedSoc circles long enough to understand the right has planned to shatter this norm long before Trump. The genie is out of the bottle.
When Conway says Judge Barrett is smart, and has the resume for the Supreme Court, I believe him. But I also know that is not why the GOP nominated her. They nominated her because she will be the vote to strike down policies they can't get the legislative votes to do.
Read 4 tweets
26 Sep
It's hard for me to read this and not come away thinking that elite lawyers like @NoahRFeldman just see the law as a game. They have no concept of how ideological control of courts affects regular people's lives.
Like, seriously, Feldman's argument boils down to, yes, Barrett's decisions would literally kill people and strip them of fundamental rights, but we ran in the same elite social circles and that's more relevant to whether she's qualified.
Feldman is in no danger if Barrett strikes down the ACA, or lets states jail women for abortion, or ends gun control, or shuts down programs that help Black people get into the school where he teaches.

He might "disagree" if she does this, but he clearly can live with it.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!