now that the media's tribe is in throes and *might* collapse culturally, the best chance would be a competing tribe to carry on the torch
even before collapse, a competing tribe is good to keep the quality up & prices down. i.e., keep the messaging *honest*.
3/ unforced error:
through pervasive propaganda, the media changed the originally multi-tribe society led by men into a mono-tribe led media. the tribe became synonymous with the state, and the state became total.
in the name of unity we gave up the idea of ever questioning.
4/ where eagles dare:
a competing tribe still *exists*, but is culturally suppressed, suspended in deep hibernation, and would take some time to rebound. in particular to build or restore *unclogged* channels of communication...
5/ we need to talk:
...and build or restore *vocabulary* that is crisp, truthful, and unencumbered by doublethink.
6/ the story so far:
the risk stems directly from there being virtually no competing tribe to the media-led one.
the angloshpere is a system connected vessels and it's been dominated by one single tribe. when that tribe catches a cold, every english speaker sneezes.
7/ gather energy:
the way forward? remind us it is okay to have a tribe. point to successful tribes that live happily in the modern society and grow in size.
Biden wants nuclear disarmament of North Korea as a *prerequisete to meet*?
Obama and Biden's administration *screwed Ukraine big time*; nobody can trust USA's word on that for a couple decades
2/ a sovereign state:
Ukraine had decent nuclear arsenal, inherited from Soviet Union
a bit dated & not enough to launch a major war, but plenty enough to keep itself *safe* from foreign attack
3/ a deal made made:
in 1994 Ukraine signed Memorandum, getting assurances of territorial integrity from USA, UK, Russia in exchange for dismantling the weapons (disarmament)