@ClarkeMicah of the Mail On Sunday (@mailonline) did not reply to requests for comment, despite the DG's letter having been mentioned by Whelan in one of @clarkemicah's blogs.
And, rather unsurprisingly, @wikileaks did not reply to requests for comment either.
It was always apparent from the evidence presented that the idea of a "Douma coverup" was fundamentally flawed and relied on questionable claims.
This letter shows there was a clear attempt to obscure the truth of what happened in Douma on 7th April 2018.
The only question that remains is whether @wikileaks, @couragefound, @ClarkeMicah, @aaronjmate et al were fooled, or whether they participated in obscuring this truth.
The only question that remains is whether @wikileaks, @couragefound, @ClarkeMicah, @aaronjmate et al were fooled, or whether they participated in obscuring this truth.
We're happy to clarify that Mr Mate said “As a general rule, I do not comment on information that I may have or have not received, but have never written about. I have never written about the document you refer to”
And have deleted the quote below which excluded "on information"
And have deleted the quote below which excluded "on information"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
