Rereading Arendt is so instructive right now. SS men "were not interested in 'everyday problems' but only 'in ideological questions.'" Nevermind that grandma is dying of COVID and my kids can't get jobs, they're gonna fight for guns and abortions!
Arendt on followers' "radical loss of self-interest, cynical or bored indifference in the face of death [COVID] or other personal catastrophes [unemployment], the passionate inclination toward the most abstract notions as guides for life [guns über alles]..."
"...and the general contempt for even the most obvious rules of common sense." Sounds familiar, eh? She called this the mass. We call this the base.
Arendt: "The chief characteristic of the mass man is not brutality and backwardness, but his isolation and lack of normal social relationships."
Arendt: In building the NSDAP, Hitler "unburdened the movement of the party's earlier program, not be changing or officially abolishing it, but simply by refusing to talk about it or discuss its points." Sound familiar, GOP?
Arendt: "Mere lust for power combined with contempt for 'talkative' articulation of what they intend to do with it is characteristic of all mob leaders."
Arendt: "In substance, the totalitarian leader is nothing more nor less than the functionary of the masses he leads." And a few rich people and members of Congress.
If Trump loses (pray God) he might disappear but his people will not. Arendt re totalitarian leaders: "Being a mere functionary, he can be replaced at any time, and he depends as much on the 'will' of the masses he embodies as the masses depend on him."
Hitler to the SA: "All that you are, you are through me; all that I am, am through you alone."
Arendt: "It would be rash indeed to discount... the terrifying roster of distinguished men whom totalitarianism can count among its sympathizers, fellow-travelers, and inscribed party members." It's a stretch to call McConnell, Graham et al "distinguished," but the point stands.
Arendt: "The elite went to war with an exultant hope that everything they knew, the whole culture and texture of life, might go down in its 'storms of steel.'" This today, I've written, is the last stand of the old, white man: burning the fields behind them.
Arendt: "To live together in the world means essentially that a world of things is between those who have it in common, as a table is located between those who sit around it; the world, like every in-between, relates and separates men at the same time."
I wrote this as an op-ed about the last stand of the angry, old, white men but didn't place it anywhere. So here it is on Medium: medium.com/whither-news/t…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeff Jarvis

Jeff Jarvis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jeffjarvis

7 Oct
Ad executive I used to respect just blocked me after I criticized him for wanting to block the voices on social media. These are the people who decide what media and what voices in social media get their support and do not. Looking for people who are too powefful? Start there.
I sat in a room with other ad execs who, with enough wine, admitted they don't want to be anywhere near news and don't care about supporting it. The only reason they care about news is their stock prices, they said. This is how they use their financial power.
What ruined the internet? The attention-based, advertiser-paid business model imported from mass media. Looking for whom to blame for a worsened net? Follow the fucking money. It will lead you back to advertisers.
Read 11 tweets
18 Sep
At #OxfordLibrary700, the NYT's Mark Thompson connects journalism and libraries as the late James Carey did: "in the wake of conversation we have need not only of the press but also of the library."
Thompson says when he arrived the digital transition at The Times was stalled and marginalized. "Digital people were the most frustrated people in the building." #OxfordLibrary700
The issue of how to make digital central is core to why so many legacy news organizations are stuck and overtaken by insurgents, says Mark Thompson. #OxfordLibrary700
Read 18 tweets
30 Aug
The virus (and fights against masks and vaccines) are merely McGuffins, props in the crazy right's anti-intellectual effort to own the libs, the experts, institutions, authority: anger for its own feel-good sake. Tighting them over masks falls into their trap, misses the point.
How then to design journalism to counteract emotions and psychoses, not misinformation? That is the challenge. It starts not with fact-checkers but with shrinks and cognitive scientists.
If you reach for smelling salts over Germans "believing" Qanon you miss the point: It's not about believing that shit but about them saying "we" (uneducated white people) hate "you" (others and their allies). The only known solution: education. Does journalism have a role?
Read 17 tweets
22 Aug
This "nation deeply divided" narrative is itself part of the problem. Politics is all about mediating disagreement. Nations are *always* divided, but with more nuance than media allow. This presumes normal is universal harmony: utopia. 1/

nytimes.com/2020/08/21/bus…
Part of the problem is media's myth of objectivity and objective truth, which they believe the nation should rally 'round and affirm, when media's real job is to listen to and inform the public debate that exists in divisions. 2/
And so the bad guys get to exploit media's catastrophizing of the public conversation, sewing division so media will panic and report that -- rather than the incompetence, corruption, and fraud of one "side" or the other. 3/
Read 10 tweets
20 Aug
No, @washingtonpost, no, no NO. How dare you? Were these pieces of silver worth the price of your soul?
The Post not only sold its front page but also sold a takeover. Who the fuck decided this? I am so ashamed of you, @washingtonpost.
And they let Trump shit on the pages of the @washingtonpost and its journalism throughout. Shameful.
Read 15 tweets
29 Jun
Much of the criticism of social media for not banning Trump is so UScentric. Imagine you run a company that also operates in countries with merely troubling heads over time: Poland, Hungary, Turkey, Italy, Singapore, Thailand (nevermind the worst., e.g., Philippines, China...) 1/
And then what does banning these bad heads of state accomplish? Does it protect their populaces from them? They have media. They have followers. Should not citizens judge their leaders? Do you really want social media companies to act as literal kingmakers? 2/
Thought experiment: Turn off Facebook & Twitter tomorrow. Is the world a better place? Have racism & inequity been solved? Or did you just waste time fighting a shadow puppet of the real problems in society? Technology isn't the cause anymore than printing was. People are. 3/
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!