The World Bank & IMF have been involved in literally dozens of ecocidal projects with disastrous outcomes, in the name of economic growth. These have caused massive loss of C sink forests & have contributed to climate change. Eg $600m loan for Indonesia’s transmigration.
About Transmigrasi see the details here. It was known to have severe ecological impacts at the time but of course World Bank financed it in the name of ‘growth’. Now we’re all paying the price. @dynamat
There are 'no realistic scenarios' to make the economic growth demanded by capitalism compatible with a safe climate, researchers who advised the United Nations found.
“the IMF's loans & policies with their foci on export-oriented growth caused deforestation in member countries like Indonesia”
We find that deforestation increases when governments participate in IMF programs, even after controlling for nonrandom selection researchgate.net/publication/28…
There are now literally dozens of papers & publications pointing to the fallacy of green growth. Why do you follow what the IMF says on this, which is contrary to what many experts are now saying, and which simply does not stack up with observations.
And we also know that continued deforestation, which is what IMF policies & lending have contributed significantly towards, is enough to cause runaway climate change & end of civilisation WITHOUT emissions from fossil fuels.
“But flying well below the radar in all of this is Indonesia, currently the world’s fifth biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, which come mainly from land use, land use change, and forestry.” Land use change = ecocide.
Palm Oil Was Supposed to Help Save the Planet. Instead It Unleashed a Catastrophe.
A decade ago, the U.S. mandated the use of vegetable oil in biofuels, leading to industrial-scale deforestation — and a huge spike in carbon emissions.
“In the mid-2000s, Western nations, led by the United States, began drafting environmental laws that encouraged the use of vegetable oil in fuels — an ambitious move to reduce carbon dioxide and curb global warming.”
Fires from land and forest fires across Indonesia this year have pumped at least 708 million tons of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere — almost double the emissions from the fires that swept through the Brazilian Amazon this year.
Pinker is an intellectual darling of the most powerful echelons of global society. He spoke to the world’s elite this year at the World’s Economic Forum in Davos on the perils of what he calls “political correctness,” and has been named one of Times “100”
In November 2017, around the time when Pinker was likely putting the final touches on his manuscript, over fifteen thousand scientists from 184 countries issued a dire warning to humanity. Because of our overconsumption of the world’s resources, they declared,
we are facing “widespread misery and catastrophic biodiversity loss.” They warned that time is running out: “Soon it will be too late to shift course away from our failing trajectory.”
“a recent report declared that the main strategy of world leaders for tackling climate change won’t work. It’s called green growth, & it’s favoured by some of the largest and most influential organisations in the world, including the UN and the World Bank” google.com.au/amp/s/theconve…
“Green growth is a vague term with many definitions, but broadly speaking, it’s the idea that society can reduce its environmental impacts and slash its emissions, even while the economy continues to grow and the quantity of stuff that’s produced and consumed increases.”
But the Decoupling Debunked report echoes work by prominent academics in finding that there is no evidence that societies have ever managed to decouple economic growth from emissions at this scale in the past, and little evidence they have the capacity to achieve it in the future
For anyone who believes 8 billion people is sustainable on planet Earth.
Here’s why it isn’t.
• We all need food
• Food is non-discretionary consumption- everyone needs it.
• Food needs agriculture.
•50% of habitable land is now used by agriculture.
• A large proportion of that land which is now agriculture used to be carbon sink forests, and used to regulate the climate. No longer.
• The rest of that land used to be grasslands, which also held C in the soil with help of herds of wildlife - no longer.
• Vast amounts of CO2 have been liberated with deforestation & continue to to be released. This is to feed 8 billion people. And the loss of C uptake of old growth forests inevitably means CO2 rises even further.